The NYT Backs Revocation of Constitutional Rights

Read more on this subject: MEDIA (MainStreamMedia – aka MSM)
Feature Article by Stephen Lendman
The NYT Backs Revocation of Constitutional Rights 

by Stephen Lendman ( – Home – Stephen Lendman) 

Under international law — notably the Nuremberg Code — that's automatically constitutional law under its Supremacy Clause, all things health related require voluntary consent.

The Biden regime and NYT want this fundamental rule of law principle abolished.

In response to the Biden regime mass-jabbing mandates, the Times cited fabricated CDC data in support of what's all about harming health, clearly not protecting it.

Defying science and the rule of law by willfully lying, the CDC falsely claimed that unjabbed Americans are 11 times more likely to die from flu/covid than jabbed ones — a bald-faced Big Lie. 

The Times went the same way by falsely claiming what it called "a deep conviction among scientists (sic) that (jabbing) hesitancy and refusal have prolonged the pandemic" &mdas
Read More or Make a Comment

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.