Supremes Again Support Toxic Mass-Jabbing

Read more on this subject: Health and Physical Fitness
Feature Article by Stephen Lendman
Supremes Again Support Toxic Mass-Jabbing

by Stephen Lendman

Support for mandated health-destroying jabs flagrantly breaches the Nuremberg Code requirement of voluntary consent on all things health related.

Toxic jabbing that doesn't protect also breaches the Hippocratic Oath principle of doing no harm.

The US Supreme Court stands guilty as charged — for the fourth time on this crucial issue.

In August, Justice Amy Coney Barrett opposed the "constitutional right to bodily integrity, autonomy, and of medical treatment choice in the context of (an unconstitutional flu/covid jabbing) mandate" — what Indiana Univ. (IU) students asked the court to ban.

In early October, Justice Sonia Sotomayor followed suit by denying an emergency request of NYC teachers to remain employed unjabbed with protecting and preserving their health in mind.

Their request followed an illegal order by mayor de Blasio to self-inflict harm or g
Read More or Make a Comment

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.