The silly and derpy shall remain nameless, but these are real comments culled from my own Facebook network. My thoughts on them are in blue. Because cut-&-paste conspiracy theories make me sad.
“not said much about this shooting as still waiting for all the ‘evidence’ to come out.. but the shit loads of ammo online reinforces my original thoughts of this being something to use to disarm the americans without many complaining…In other words an inside job”
“lone gun man with military grade equipment…. riiight”
Which anyone, including Mr. Riiight, can buy online.
“this person most definitely was out of character not to mention the mind control attributes that have been involved in quite a few historic incidents such as the Moscow Theater hostage.
“I’ve been researching this for the past 12 hours. The connections to CIA are BIZARRE, to say the least. It’s far too much to get into right now, but suffice it to say there is more proof coming out hourly that Holmes was recruited by the CIA when he returned to the University of Denver last fall. In fact, the evidence that suggests this entire rampage was a planned operation timed to coincide with the signing of the UN Gun Treaty is bone chilling. This is no “conspiracy theory”. The evidence is quite literally mounting on an hourly basis.”
The CIA “links” to James Holmes, as laid out by one Tony Elliott (NO RELATION), are as follows:
1. James lived on campus. CIA recruiters like college campuses. (Ivy League and top forty ones, yes. If CIA recruiters are skulking around the University of Colorado on a daily basis, they’re scraping the barrel.)
2. His withdrawal from school coincides with his purchase of weapons. This is an indication that he was recruited during that time. (Or that he had nothing left to live for and decided to act out his sick fantasies, or that he had a mental breakdown caused in part by academic pressure, or that he had a brain tumour like Austin shooter Charles Whitman, or about seven thousand other possibilities.)
3. The CIA wants to stage fake terror attack to keep the fear of terrorism alive, justifying their foreign wars of aggression. (So…how does staging small-scale domestic attacks accomplish this, exactly?)
4. The UN Arms Treaty thing. Reuters dealt with this better than I can.
“9/11 was more than 10 years ago, and they got a veritable grab-bag of powers and TWO wars (afghanistan and iraq) over that false flag attack. Go back some more, to the wars with Cuba and Vietnam, and the false flag attacks that preceded those. There are (lots) more too, but these will be the easiest for most people to find out about.“
I’m sorry, “war with Cuba”? Did I fall asleep in history class? Also, no false flag attacks preceded Vietnam.
“I refuse to look at this man. I refuse to learn his name. I’m tired of the perps getting press. I will only learn the names of his victims, see THEIR faces and hear THEIR stories. Conspiracy or not, he made the choice.“
^ If I was single, and bi, I would ask this gal to marry me.