Jack White’s Apollo Hoax Evidence

They’ve now deleted the only copy left of Jack White’s Apollo Hoax book on Scribd.com. Here is a link to all of Jack White’s Apollo Hoax Evidence and below are a few examples of his work:

11flymetothemoon Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
This is NASA image AS11-40-5922 of the lunar lander supposedly taken on the moon. Is that construction paper, tape, and foil!? Can anybody tell me with a straight face that this is a multi-million dollar space craft?

17scotchcmrev2 Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence11nopaddust Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
There is no burn print under the lunar lander’s 10,000 pound thrusters, nor a speck of dust/dirt on the landing pods (as though it was just set down in place), even though NASA scientists in their own documents were worried about the lander falling into it’s massive burn radius.

11aldrinaccouterments Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
In these images of Buzz Aldrin we can see his boots and gloves changing colors and shapes. If he was really on the moon then this would mean de-pressurizing his suit time and again for fashion’s sake.

tracklessrover Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidenceroverstowchap1 Jack Whites Apollo Hoax EvidenceIn the top image there are footprints all around but the moon rover has no tracks in front or behind it. In the bottom image there are rover tracks in the foreground but the rover has clearly yet to be unpacked. What gives?

11 14sunsetonmoon Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidenceas12sunbulbrevise Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidencesolarphotography Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence14sunthrulem Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
These pictures of the “sun” look and act nothing like the sun but rather like a large studio spotlight.

12lensflaresstudy Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence12dinespotlight Jack Whites Apollo Hoax EvidenceRemember, the astronauts brought no extra lighting to the moon. The only source of light should be the sun. Does that helmet reflection look like the sun to you? It looks like a spotlight to me.

redreflection Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidenceceilingshadowlm Jack Whites Apollo Hoax EvidenceThere is studio lighting reflecting off a black background in the top picture. Subtraction of the yellow and blue from the chroma scale shows this clearly. If that was really the blackness of space, then there would be nothing to refract the light. The bottom picture also shows a similar effect from the lander’s shadow against the studio ceiling.

16lemretouch Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence11morebsky Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidencesquareearthrevealed Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
earthedgeartifacts Jack Whites Apollo Hoax EvidenceThese pictures all suggest that NASA has taken the liberty of retouching the perfect blackness of “space” and photoshopped a rectangular Earth image into the composites.

14newreticulestudy Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
14impossiblelighting Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
12lightdirsurveyor Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence14 68 9486%252B7lines Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidenceraq4 Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
Since they did not bring any extra lighting on the lunar lander, the sun was the only light source, so all shadows should be cast in the same direction like the this:

raq5 Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
But in dozens of NASA photos there are shadows being cast in up to 3 directions simultaneously, often at almost 90 degree angles. This can only be the result of multiple light sources not available on the moon.

17hillsmatchcomp Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence17rockbooboos Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence17tallshortmountain Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
16panohillscomp Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence

15twolems Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
15splicephotos2lems Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
15lempantwist Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
15lemornolemcomp Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
15hadleydeltaspur Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
15frontbacklempans Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence
Last but not least, these Apollo 15-17 photographs prove that the same studio backgrounds were being re-used over and over again even though the astronauts were supposedly moving around to completely different locations on the moon. What do people think of all these photographic anomalies? Does anyone still think NASA’s been to the moon? Still trust anything they have to say?

cooltext11381601551 Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence

Want to learn more?

Use Facebook to Comment on this Post

lg share en Jack Whites Apollo Hoax Evidence