THE WAR ON HUMANS

A lot of people are watching and discussing this movie. Here are just a few unmentioned concepts to toss into the mix. Are humans the enemy? Should pigs and plants be given constitutional rights? The War on Humans e-book and companion documentary explore how a new generation of activists are pushing a radical agenda whose ultimate victims will be the poorest and most vulnerable among us.

Dr Eric Pianka, a top University of Texas professor, advocated such policies when he said that China’s one child policy, enforced by a brutal police state, was a good thing. Dr. Pianka also actively pushes for the death of 95% of the population by the release of eboli into the atmosphere. He embraces a coming human holocaust and has, not surprisingly, many enthusiastic supporters. The danger is no longer just Pianka and his doctrine but his students who scuttle from his classes fully intent on the eradication of the human species. These become some of the monsters who create horrors in their laboratories….

Before watching this amazing video, and perhaps reading the ebook, keep the following quotes in mind. I have gathered them from previous posts on the matter of eugenics and the human race. You might be surprised at the sources from whence they come. Some of the most dastardly I have found in the past come from organizations such as Earth First!, Greenpeace; Sea Shepherd Society, World Wild life Federation and so many others. For this reason, I do not donate to “green” organizations unless they are local and I see the results in my own backyard.
 

“Christianity is our foe. If animal rights are to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.” ~ Peter Singer, the “Father of Animal Rights”

Yes, dear Reader, those words come from beloved Communist tool Pete Seeger, the man whose influence engaged generations in political action.

Cannibalism is a “radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation.” ~ Lyall Watson, The Financial Times, 15 July 1995

Just like during the Bolshevik enforced slaughter of the victims of Holodomor? 

 Forced to cannibalism, Ukranian peasants during Holodomor. Notice there is that magic number of 6 million again!

“Protecting the Environment is a ruse. The goal is the political and economic subjugation of most men by the few, under the guise of preserving nature.” ~ J. H. Robbins

Global Sustainability requires:

“the deliberate quest of poverty,

reduced resource consumption,

and set levels of mortality control.” ~ Professor Maurice King

“Allowing the EPA to condone continued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweighs the risks is absolutely anathema to the environmental community.” ~ Janet Hathaway, Natural Resources Defense Council.

“The Environmentalists Dream is an Egalitarian Society based on: rejection of economic growth, a smaller population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equally” ~ Aaron Wildavsk

“A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect.” ~ Richard Benedict, State Dept. employee working on assignment from the Conservation Foundation

“Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.” ~ Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University.

“The secret to David McTaggart’s (early officer in Greenpeace) success is the secret to Greenpeace’s success: It doesn’t matter what is true . . . . it only matters what people believe is true . . . . You are what the media define you to be. [Greenpeace] became a myth, and a myth-generating machine.” ~ Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace

“A year is about one-fifth of the time we have left if we are going to preserve any kind of quality in our world.” ~ Garrett de Bell (1970).

“The historical experience of socialist countries has sadly demonstrated that collectivism does not do away with alienation but rather increases it, adding to it a lack of basic necessities and economic inefficiency.” ~ Pope John Paul I

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects . We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres of presently settled land.” ~ David Foreman, Earth First!

“The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans.” Dr. Reed F. Noss, The Wildlands Project

“One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of Gods selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.” Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard ~ member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank.

“As radical environmentalists, we can see AIDS not as a problem, but as a necessary solution.” ~ Miss Ann Thropy (pseudonym), Earth First! Journal

“The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing. This is not to say that the rise of human civilization is insignificant, but there is no way of showing that it will be much help to the world in the long run.” ~ Economist editorial

“I suspect that the politicians and businessmen who are jumping on the environment bandwagon dont have the slightest idea of what they are getting into. They are talking about emission control devices on automobiles, while we are talking about bans on automobiles.” ~ Dennis Hayes, Earth Day Agenda (1970)

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed ~ and hence clamorous to be led to safety ~ by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H. L. Mencken

“If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” ~ Prince Phillip, World Wildlife Fund

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” ~ Maurice Strong, Head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 per day.” ~ Dr.Jacques Cousteau

“I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems.” ~ John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

“The world has cancer, and the cancer is man.” A. Gregg, Mankind at the Turning Point

“People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and this (ban of DDT) is as good a way as any.” ~ Charles Wurster, Environmental Defense Fund

“This is a political game. It has nothing to do with science. It has nothing to do with health and safety.” ~ Sherry Neddick, Greenpeace

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” ~ Mikhail Gorbachev, Former President of the Soviet Union, member of the Club of Rome

Wesley Smith grasps the dangerous paradox of thinkers whose first step in exalting nature is to attack human nature. ~ Steven Hayward, Visiting Scholar in Conservative Thought and Policy University of Colorado, Boulder

Unfortunately, the primary values of the original environmental movement have gone the way of bell-bottom jeans. ~ Wesley J. Smith, The War on Humans

….a riveting expose of [the] multi-dimensional assault on human beings… ~ Nat Hentoff, Syndicated Columnist

“Protecting the Environment is a ruse. The goal is the political and economic subjugation of most men by the few, under the guise of preserving nature.” ~ J. H. Robbins

 

And of course, as part of this assault, not covered in this video:

ELITE EUGENICISTS CALL FOR MASS DEPOPULATION, DRASTIC REDUCTION IN ENERGY CONSUMPTION

POPULATION REDUCTION AGENDA FOR DUMMIES

And when all is said and done, although the author of this film/documentary never goes there, never forget from whence much of this illness comes:

Nixon Was Framed by the Illuminati

nixon.jpg

Richard Nixon was framed by the elite. Coming from Mark Gorton, this conclusion is all the more interesting.

Gorton is a respected engineer,  millionaire financier and entrepreneur.
He founded the music sharing site Limewire, and he runs Tower Research, a famed high-frequency trading firm.

Gorton also believes that a ruthless “secret cabal” led by H.W. Bush  assassinated JFK and planned 9/11.
A “criminal network” controls government and business “yet most people don’t have any idea that it exists.”
He circulated these conclusions to employees last week. Generally, they are a synopsis of his reading.

He is naive about some things — that a coup d’etat took place in 1963 when in fact the US has been run by
the Illuminati since Theodore Roosevelt or earlier.  He is wrong about others – like the Saudis and the Bushes
were behind  9-11. (No mention of the Mossad or Freemasons – Gorton is probably Jewish.)  But his assessment of
Richard Nixon and Watergate seems correct to me, and I present it here.
In 1945, Richard Nixon was a US Navy lawyer assigned to look in captured Nazi documents which showed Nazi collusion with Allen Dulles. In exchange for helping to cover up the Dulles war time treason, Allen Dulles and Prescott Bush agreed to help finance Nixon’s political career.

In 1946, Nixon was able to win election to the house of representatives with their contributions. In 1947, the Dulles brothers took Nixon under their wing and escorted him on a tour of Fascist ‘freedom fight’ operations in Germany. Through the late 1940’s and early 1950’s, Nixon proved himself as a loyal ally. In return, Prescott Bush was instrumental in selecting Nixon as the Vice Presidential candidate in 1952. Nixon was in the odd position of being an ally of key Cabal members while never being a member of the inner circle. Nixon was politically ambitious and willing to work with distasteful people and do distasteful things in order to further his political career, yet at the same time, he resented being dependent on these powerful, corrupt interests.

MARK-GORTON-large570.jpg(Gorton, left)

Once Nixon was elected to his second term as president in 1972, he achieved a degree of independence that made him a danger to the Cabal. Deep down, Nixon was never as corrupt as core Cabal members, and toward the end of his first term, he began making plans to purge the entire senior leadership of the CIA. Unfortunately, Nixon did not realize the the CIA had the White House bugged and filled his senior staff  with spies. So the Cabal leadership was well aware of Nixon’s plans. Nixon had a reputation for being paranoid. Yet he was not paranoid enough. His enemies had him surrounded to a degree which he did not understand.

In 1973, after Nixon has stopped being a compliant servant of the Cabal, they set off the booby trap in the form of the Watergate Coup, and they pulled Nixon down from power just as they put him up.

WATERGATE

The traditional story of Watergate is one where Nixon does a bunch of bad things, gets caught, tries to cover it up, and is forced to resign; however, in reality Watergate was a plot by the Cabal behind the JFK assassination and corrupt elements within the CIA and military intelligence to depose Nixon.

The Watergate Coup served several purposes, but perhaps its most lasting impact was to ensconce George H.W. Bush as the new head of the Cabal. Like his father, George H.W. Bush was a graduate of Yale and a member of Skull and Bones. In a world where connections and pedigree mattered, George H. W. Bush was the crown prince within the CIA.

The first stages of the Watergate Coup involved creating a fake scandal to force the resignation of Vice President Spiro Agnew. With Agnew out of the way, the Watergate Coup plotters were free to place one of their own in position to take the presidency. Nixon wanted to appoint John Connolly of Texas as VP, but Connolly was not a Cabal member, so the Republican establishment loyal to Bush threatened to block Connolly’s nomination, and Nixon was forced to pick a Vice President acceptable to the Cabal.

Gerald Ford, as a member of the Warren Commission, had played a key role in covering up the Coup of ’63. Ford was not an inner circle member of the Cabal behind the Coup of ’63, but he was solidly aligned with them and could be counted on to support and enable the secret government structures buried within the national security state.

The Watergate burglars themselves were headed by CIA agent E. Howard Hunt. Hunt had been a key operational player in the Coup of ’63. He was even clearly photographed as one of the three tramps arrested near Dealey Plaza immediately after the shooting of JFK. On his death bed, Hunt confessed to his involvement in the Coup of ’63 and named LBJ as the leader of the plot. To execute the Watergate break in, Hunt rounded up some old Cuban comrades who had also been active in supporting JFK’s assassination. To those in the know, the makeup of the Watergate burglars was a clear signal that Watergate was a plot on behalf of the Cabal behind the Coup of ’63.

To execute the disinformation campaign surrounding Watergate, the Watergate Coup plotters turned to ex-naval intelligence officer, Bob Woodward, who had been inserted into the Washington Post. Woodward then proceeded to craft a series of stories that make up much of the myth of Watergate that we know today.

clintonx.jpgIn order to complete the take down of Nixon, the President had to be denied the due process which could have allowed him an effective legal defense before the House Judiciary Committee where the impeachment resolutions regarding Watergate had been referred. At this time, in 1973, a young Hillary Clinton was working as a staff lawyer for the committee.

Even this early in her career, Clinton showed her willingness to ally herself with powerful, corrupt interests. Clinton along with several other staff members of the committee conspired to deny Nixon access to legal counsel. In order to pull this off, Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief and confiscated public documents to hide her deception. Her boss Jeffery Zeifman later fired Hillary for her unethical actions and said about Hillary, “She was a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

Obama Heads for War on Ukraine

Ukraine

 

Permanent war is official US policy. At issue is unchallenged global dominance.

All independent governments are targeted. Eliminating them is prioritized. So is replacing them with pro-Western puppet states.

Ukraine is Exhibit A. Obama bears full responsibility for ousting its democratically elected government. Elevating illegitimate fascist putschists to power followed.

Sham May elections will be farcical when held. Here’s an example showing why.

Oleg Tsarev is a presidential aspirant. He’s a former Yanukovych-led Party of Regions people’s deputy.

 

On April 7, he was lawlessly expelled. During months of US-manipulated violent Maidan protests, he forthrightly opposed them.

He participated in a Svoboda Slova talk show. After finishing, neo-Nazi Right Sector thugs attacked him. They brutally beat him. He’s hospitalized in critical condition.

His candidacy stands. He won’t withdraw, he said. Washington ignored what happened. So did other Western countries. Media scoundrels buried the story. Russia bashing takes precedence.

Russian Foreign Ministry human rights commissioner Konstantin Dologov noted a “shy (Western) silence.”

Presidential candidate Mikahil Dobkin participated on the same program. En route, Right Sector thugs confronted him.

They blocked his car. They damaged it. They attacked his aides. Dobkin explained on air.

He and Tsarvev are independent candidates. Ruling putschists intend having one of their own become president.

Rigged voting assures it. Opposition elements aren’t tolerated. Tsarvev’s treatment reveals their dark side. Police states operate this way.

Last weekend, CIA director John Brennan held secret talks in Kiev. Russian media said he arrived under an assumed name.

He held “a series of secret meetings.” He did so with Obama’s new friends. They’re fascist thugs. They’re societal misfits.

They represent mob rule. They have no legitimacy whatever. It doesn’t matter. They enjoy full US support.

Washington belatedly confirmed Brennan’s visit. White House press secretary Jay Carney lied claiming his arrival was “part of a trip to Europe.”

“Senior level visits of intelligence officials are a standard means of fostering mutually beneficial security cooperation,” he added.

CIA elements operate disruptively. They’re not good will ambassadors. Their history reflects dozens of lawless operations.

Brennan came to plot war strategy. He wants Eastern Ukrainian freedom fighters attacked. He wants them eliminated. He wants them slaughtered in cold blood.

He wants challengers to Washington’s imperium crushed. He risks civil war in Ukraine. He risks potential East/West confrontation. Putin is obligated to protect Russian nationals.

Weeks earlier, he issued a statement, saying:

“Due to the emergency situation in Ukraine and a threat being posed to the lives of Russian nationals, our compatriots, and the Russian military contingent stationed in Ukraine (the Autonomous Republic of Crimea) in compliance with international agreements, I ask the Federation Council for permit to use Russian armed forces on the territory of Ukraine until social and political situation in the country stabilizes.”

Under Article 102 of Russia’s Constitution, upper house Federation Council members are responsible for deciding whether to deploy government troops externally.

On March 1, they voted unanimously to do so. They won’t let their nationals go unprotected. Nor will Putin.

On April 14, Sergei Lavrov was clear and unequivocal saying:

“If the authorities in Kiev use force, our entire cooperation on the Ukrainian issue will be undermined. We have let this known to our Western partners.”

“Here is what is in line with Russian interests – an integral, united, brotherly Ukraine friendly to us, in which citizens live calmly,” he added.

“This can be achieved solely by carrying out a deep constitutional reform, in which all political forces without an exception and all Ukrainian regions should participate on an equal basis.”

“We support the stance of the southeast…Western hypocrisy over Ukraine is blown out of proportion.”

Kiev’s “decision to apply military force is an extremely dangerous development.”

“Those, who encourage such actions in Kiev should be held responsible to the full extent.”

He means Washington and rogue Western partners without naming them.

Ukraine is Russia’s red line. Putin stressed it earlier. He forthrightly supports right over wrong. He’s viciously bashed for doing so.

Russia’s permanent NATO representative Alexander Grushko said Moscow will act responsibly to protects its interests.

Russia “exited the Cold War and has no intention to return there,” he said. “At the same time, we will take into account in our military planning any possible changes in NATO forces and configurations and, if necessary, will take necessary measures in the interests of ensuring our security.”

US-led NATO countries alone threaten world peace. Challenging Russia recklessly is official policy. Escalating conflict in Ukraine risks letting things spin out-of-control.

Obama risks doing it. He appears headed for war. Institutionalized recklessness threatens everyone. Confronting him resolutely matters.

Stopping him matters most. Putin most of all needs to do so. If not him, who? Humanity’s fate hangs in the balance.

On April 15, illegitimate putschist president Aleksander Turchynov announced an “anti-terrorism operation” launched in northern Donetsk region.

Overnight Monday it began, he said. He lied claiming it’s “to protect the citizens of Ukraine.” It’s being conducted “stage-by-stage,” he said.

A video clip showed Rodinskoye residents stopping a tank en route to engage peaceful protesters.

Putschist National Security and Defense Council head Andrey Parubiy said first battalion National Guard forces “comprised of volunteers from Maidan self-defense troops” were deployed to southeast Ukraine.

Earlier Turchynov proposed having so-called UN peacekeepers involved. Ones he has in mind are regime-supporting paramilitary thugs. The kind Washington endorses.

Lavrov categorically condemned using them. He called doing so “totally unacceptable.” Security Council authorization is needed to send them. Russia’s veto threat assures blocking deploying them.

Brennan plotted with Turchynov and other regime thugs to wage war. Apparently it started. Neo-Nazi Right Sector thugs are involved. Widespread bloodshed is likely.

On Monday, Putin urged Obama to prevent it. Doing so fell on deaf ears. A Kremlin statement following their conversation said:

“In response to the president of the United States’ expressed concern about Russia’s supposed meddling in southeastern Ukraine, the president of Russia noted that such speculations are based on inaccurate information.”

Kiev putschists bear full responsibility for Eastern Ukrainian resistance. They’re unwilling and unable “to take into account the interests of the Russian and Russian-speaking population,” it added.

Obama criticized Putin. He wants Ukrainian freedom fighters crushed. He lied about Russian troops mobilized on Ukraine’s border. He told Putin to withdraw what doesn’t exist.

Putin stressed involving “all political forces in the country, creating a federalized state and guaranteeing Ukraine’s nonaligned status.”

His press secretary Dmitry Peskov said Kremlin authorities got repeated pleas from Eastern Ukrainians for protection.

“He is getting a lot of appeals addressed personally to him, asking him to intervene in one way or another. He is monitoring the situation in Ukraine with great concern.”

On April 15, Itar Tass cited witnesses claiming a downed Ukrainian warplane. Government “armored vehicles…entered the city of Slavyansk in the eastern Ukrainian Donetsk Oblast,” it said.

Local media reported “500 servicemen, 20 armored personnel carriers (APCs), buses and other vehicles.”

According to acting mayor Vyacheslav Ponomaryov, Slavyansk is reportedly surrounded.

Kiev-appointed illegitimate mayor Nelli Shtepa lied claiming looters terrorized city residents.

Ponomaryov said she willfully spreads disinformation. She’s part of the problem. She’s not the solution.

“(S)he betrays her own city,” said Itar Tass. She “fled Slavyansk the day before.” The city appears calm.

“No cases of riots or looting (were) registered since” federalization protests began.

“Most shops, clinics and a hospital work in line with (their) ordinary schedule.”

“Classes in schools and kindergartens (were) suspended. Slavyansk residents move around the city easily.”

Public transport keeps running. Restrictions limit private cars from entering city center areas.

Anti-putschist protesters said Kiev forces seized Kramatorsk’s airfield.

“They started negotiating with the people’s militia, which is in control of the airfield. The shooting started unexpectedly.”

“There are injured among the people’s militia, and there may be deaths,” they said.

Other militia members blocked Kramatorsk’s entrance. They’re ready to defend their city. They control it.

“We were forced out of the airfield,” they said. They won’t let Kiev troops inside their city. A bloody confrontation may follow.

General Vasily Krutov is Ukrainian Security Bureau (SBU) first deputy head. Putschists put him in charge of Anti-Terrorist Center operations. He’s leading them against protesters.

He warned them to lay down arms. Otherwise they’ll be attacked. They’ll be “destroyed,” he said.

He lied claiming hundreds of Russian Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) elements involved.

Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Pushkov responded, saying:

“These are absurd statements. There are no Russian troops there. The president and the foreign minister have spoken about it.”

“We can only be startled by the fact that all these statements made by the Russian side are deliberately chosen not to be heard.”

Truth is systematically silenced. Big Lies block them out. Moscow calls ordering attacks on anti-regime protesters “criminal.”

Jay Carney lied. He accused Russia of “provocative actions.”

“I can assure you that Russia’s provocations – further transgressions and provocations – will come with a cost,” he said.

“And I’m not here to specify what cost will come from which specific action, but there have already been costs imposed on Russia; there will be further costs imposed on Russia.”

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Washington stands ready to impose sanctions on more individuals and entities.

She named financial services, energy, metals, mining, engineering and defense sectors. Doing so cuts both ways.

Russia and China plan mutual trade in their own currencies. Doing so will greatly impact dollar strength. Other countries may follow suit.

America is vulnerable. Chickens eventually come home to roost. Maybe sooner expected. Perhaps with major impact.

It’s long past time America got its comeuppance. No nation in world history is more ruthless. None more lawless. None more reckless.

None more venal. None more run by criminals masquerading as politicians. None more controlled by monied interests.

None more contemptuous of democratic values. None more recklessly out-of-control.

None more responsible for human misery globally. None more threatening humanity’s survival.

Stopping this monster’s rampaging matters most. Replacing it with responsible governance. Holding its criminal elements responsible.

Survival depends on it. American tyranny is by far the world’s most dangerous. Resisting it is a moral imperative. If not now, when? If not us, who? If that’s not reason enough to act, what is?

A Final Comment

Days earlier, Putin addressed 18 EU leaders. He did so by letter. He did responsibly. He called for urgent cooperation. He discussed Ukraine’s gas debt.

It’s been unpaid for three months. He wants addressing it prioritized. Failure to do so risks cutting off supplies.

Poland’s Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said European officials planned a joint Monday response.

European Commission chairman Jose Manuel Barroso requested it. He’ll deliver it in person in Moscow.

It’ll address issues Putin raised. EU members stress “preserving unity in relations with the Russians,” Sikorski said.

On Monday, Itar Tass discussed what Moscow wants EU officials to say. Russia’s permanent EU representative Vladimir Chizhov said four-power April 17 Geneva talks depend on it.

He’s unimpressed with what EU officials sent. Their document
contains many issues, he said. “(B)ut I would like to pay attention to what it lacks.”

“Unfortunately, it does say a word, gives no assessment to actions of Kiev authorities which are prepared to throw not only eastern Ukraine, but also the whole country in turmoil of the civil war.”

“(T)he EU Council conclusions condemned only some armed elements in eastern Ukrainian cities who allegedly try to destabilise that country.”

“The fact that those who seized power in Kiev in an armed coup consistently destabilise Ukraine by their actions is not mentioned in the document.”

“It also contains the scope of wordings biased and unjust for Russia’s policy towards Ukrainian crisis up to a demand that is already absolutely unacceptable and is not just interference in domestic affairs, but also domestic lawmaking.”

It wants Putin’s authorization to use troops to protect Russian nationals cancelled. It wants Western-backed Ukrainian forces given free reign to attack their own people.

“As for practical consequences, this document is purely political which we will certainly take into account, but mostly important is that what will be happening…in Ukraine in next few days and even hours.”

“Appeals and vigorous statements over a four-party meeting in Geneva this Thursday sound certainly optimistic, but it is clear that if the situation in Ukraine grows in(to) a massive bloodshed, there will be nothing to discuss with the so-called acting Ukrainian foreign minister.”

Incendiary conditions exist. Mass slaughter may follow. It bears repeating. Washington bears full responsibility. Brennan authorized full-scale conflict. It’s early stages appear underway.

More NATO Forces for Eastern Europe

UkraineUS-led NATO threatens world peace. It’s a global killing machine. It prioritizes militarism and war. It threatens humanity in the process.

It’s escalating East/West tensions. It supports Kiev fascist putschists. It buries truth. It spreads lies about Russia.

On April 16, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said:

“We have just taken further measures to respond to the crisis in Ukraine.”

“We call on Russia to be part of the solution. To stop destabilising Ukraine, pull back its troops from the borders and make clear it doesn’t support the violent actions of well armed militias of pro-Russian separatists.”

NATO deployed warplanes to Eastern Europe provocatively. US navy vessels patrol Black Sea waters. France plans sending one of its own to join them.

Rasmussen announced stepped up measures. He called doing so “reinforc(ing) our collective defence and demonstrat(ing) the strength of Allied security.”

More warplanes are coming. More ships. More troop deployments. Sending them means more “readiness” on land, he said.

Measures announced are being implemented straightaway. “More will follow, if needed, in the weeks and months to come,” he added.

Doing so “send(s) a clear message. NATO will protect every Ally and defend against any threat against our fundamental security. That is our firm commitment.”

No threats exists. Invented ones substitute. Rasmussen didn’t explain. He’s a convenient US stooge. He serves at America’s behest. He’s one of its imperial frontmen.

Stars and Stripes is a Pentagon publication. On April 16, it headlined “NATO to deploy more forces to eastern Europe in response to Ukraine crisis.”

It quoted Rasmussen saying “(m)ilitary staff from allied nations will deploy to enhance our preparedness, training and exercises. Our defense plans will be reviewed and reinforced.”

General Philip Breedlove ordered increased readiness. He’s Washington’s European commander/Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR)/NATO Allied Command Operations head.

He wants more US-led NATO warplanes, ships and land forces. He wants them closer to Russia’s borders. He does so despite no Moscow threat. Claims otherwise are false.

Commodore Georgiy Alafuzoff formerly was Finland’s Defense Forces Intelligence Manager. He’s currently EU intelligence military intelligence head.

No Russian involvement in Eastern Ukraine exists, he said. No reported military presence. Moscow had nothing to do with seizing government buildings in Eastern Ukraine cities, he stressed.

Claims otherwise are false. “In my opinion, it’s mostly people who live in the region who are not satisfied with the current state of affairs,” he explained.

They’re concerned about their own welfare. They risk losing fundamental freedoms. Alafuzoff agrees with what Sergei Lavrov and other Russian officials stress.

Western propaganda claims otherwise. It drowns out truth. It substitutes lies. On April 16, Itar Tass headlined “Foreign observers carry out 8 inspections in Russia’s territory.”

They reflect Moscow’s military transparency measures. They comply with 2002 Open Skies Treaty provisions. Thirty-four nations are signatories.

They include Russia, America, Canada, Turkey, Ukraine and most other European states. They permit unarmed surveillance overflights. They promote military activity openness.

In March alone, Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov said foreign inspectors carried out eight Russian territory inspections.

Seven were near the Ukraine/Russian border. No evidence suggests a massive military buildup. Claims otherwise are false. They’re groundless, said Antonov.

“We have mechanisms of transparency agreed in Vienna within the framework of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE),” he explained.

“There is the Open Skies Treaty and the 2011 Vienna Document on Transparency and Confidence-building Measures which provide for certain verification procedures,” he said.

“It is nonsense to say that the nuclear West is disarming while the nuclear Russia is building up forces.”

Russia destroyed over 2,000 ground-based ballistic missiles. They included cruise missiles able to hit targets from 500 to 5,500 kilometers away.

More than 3,000 nuclear warheads with a combined 500,000 ton yield were eliminated. So were 825 launchers.

“NATO has 10,000 tanks,” said Antonov. “(W)e have only 3,500…”

“NATO has 22,000 armored vehicles compared to Russia’s 7,500,” he added. Don’t figures speak for themselves, he stressed.

They’re ignored. They’re not reported. Russia bashing takes precedence. Lies substitute for truth.

Putin press secretary Dmitry Peskov said Western news consumers are denied real information.

“It’s very regrettable but it’s so,” he said. Even comments by Putin, Lavrov, and other top Russian officials are ignored. A “concrete wall of censorship” blocks them out.

“We never saw anything like this before. We never thought this could happen and that it could happen so openly,” said Peskov.

On geopolitical issues, the Washington Post is a de facto CIA publication. Columnist David Ignatius has longstanding close US intelligence ties.

His commentaries lack credibility. He lies for power. On April 15, he headlined “The Cost of Putin’s adventurism in Ukraine.”

None whatever exists. Not according to Ignatius. He lied saying he “seiz(ed) Crimea.”

He’s “fomenting unrest in eastern Ukraine, perhaps as a prelude to invasion.”

“…Russian agents infiltrat(ed) eastern Ukraine, backed by 40,000 troops just across the border,” he claimed.

Truth is polar opposite. It bears repeating. Ignatius lies for power. He willfully spreads disinformation. He’s stoking conflict.

“(T)he White House sees Putin weighing three options,” he said. He calls all of them “bad for the West.” Two are fabricated. More on them below.

The other is accurate. Putin supports involving all Ukrainian political voices in a federalized state. He favors Ukrainian nonaligned status.

Option two, said Ignatius, is “annex(ing) eastern Ukraine.” Putin forthrightly opposes it. Claims otherwise are false.

Option three is “invasion, using the pretext of civil war in eastern Ukraine,” said Ignatius.

Putin plans none. At the same time, he’s committed to protecting Russian nationals if endangered.

Western leaders would do no less for their own. Washington invents threats. It does so to deploy US forces to foreign countries.

Putin responsibly uses his. He prioritizes saving lives. Mass slaughter and destruction follow Pentagon deployments.

Don’t expect Ignatius to explain. He claims Putin “prefers the veneer of legitimacy.” He shames his US counterpart.

He respects national sovereignty. He supports rule of law principles. His governance is polar opposite Obama’s.

Ignatius claims he prefers “paramilitary covert action, rather than rolling tanks across an international border.”

Russia’s military strength is a “warning sign that (he’ll) keep the threat of force alive until his demands are met,” he added.

Hegemons operate this way. Washington is Exhibit A. One country after another is targeted. They’re systematically ravaged and destroyed.

Putin prioritizes peace and stability. His policies reflect his pronouncements. Ignatius didn’t explain.

Lies substituted for truth. His columns feature them. He’s part of the Putin bashing crowd. He’s one of many.

Outrageous misinformation persists. Readers are cheated. They’re grossly misinformed. War of words is vicious.

Propaganda wars precede hot ones. Conflicts glorify them. They do so in the name of peace. They rage one after another.

Hegemons give no quarter. Mass slaughter and destruction are standard practice. All US direct and proxy wars turn out this way.

Ukraine may become the latest example. Victims are blamed for US crimes. Today’s yellow journalism makes earlier stuff look tame by comparison.

The so-called “newspaper of record” operates as lead US ministry of information and propaganda. The Washington Post doesn’t hide its CIA connection.

Big Lies repeat ad nauseam. Perhaps employment contracts mandate proliferating misinformation, deceit and distortion.

Truth is buried. Ethical standards are ignored. Daily fare reads like bad fiction. Television is worst of all.

Demagoguery, warmongering, Big Lies, censorship, pseudo-journalism, and juiced-up junk food news substitute for vital information viewers most need to know.

May Ukrainians for peace, equity and justice prevail. May they inspire activists globally. May they motivate others to join them.

May their ranks overflow. May freedom triumph worldwide. May humanity be saved.

Does History Follow Rothschild Masterplan?

This period cartoon illustrates the crowned heads of Europe — the ostensible rulers of the day — bowing before Lionel Rothschild on his throne of mortgages, loans and cash. In fact, this was the reality of the day, the effective fruition of the age-old Jewish dream of a New World Order — a Jewish Utopia — in which all other peoples of the planet would bow down and worship the Jewish people, the new rulers of the Earth. For good reason, indeed, Rothschild was known as the “king of kings.” (Michael Collins Piper- The New Babylon
The ideology behind the New World Order may be Jewish Messianism, the view that God has chosen “the King of the Jews” to rule the world. This “Messiah,” or antichrist, will be selected from the ranks of the Rothschild family.

This argument is espoused in a rare, suppressed book entitled “Elijah, Rothschilds and the Ark of the Covenant” by Tom Crotser & Jeremiah Patrick (Restoration Press, 1984.)

The book details the Rothschild’s quest for and discovery of the Ark of the Covenant, a gold-covered box supposedly built by Moses to hold  Aaron’s Rod and the original Ten Commandment tablets. Apparently the Rothschilds intend to place this in Salomon’s Temple in Jerusalem to legitimize their claim to be the Messiah.

(Rothschilds and Israeli leaders study model of Rothschild sponsored Israeli Supreme Court, destined to be World Court.)

According to the authors, this bizarre vision rooted in Biblical prophesy is behind economic and political events today. The Zionist vision is much larger than a Jewish homeland.  “The Messianic hope promises the establishment by the Jews of world power in Palestine to which all the nations of the earth will pay homage.”  (p. 29)

“This glorious age can only be affected by a man, a scion of the House of David” who will lead the Jews to “righteousness” and “regenerate” the human race.

According to the Talmud, this Messiah from the seed of David shall subjugate the heathen nations and make Israel the world power.

Summarizing the Talmud, Rabbi Michael Higger wrote that:  “All the treasures and natural resources of the world will eventually come in possession of the righteous.” This, he said, would be in keeping, with thy prophecy of Isaiah: “In her gain and her hire shall be holiness to the Lord; it shall be not treasured nor laid out, for her gain shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat their fill and for stately clothing.” (The Jewish Utopia, 1932)

Obviously, the majority of Jews are not informed of this plan, the easier to manipulate them.

MESSIAH MAKERS
The Rothschilds saw themselves in the role of Messiah-facilitator, if not Messiah.

As early as 1836, Anselm Meyer Rothschild received a letter from rabbi Hirsch Kalischer, who revealed to him the divine plan: “Let no one imagine that the Messiah will appear suddenly and amid miracles and wonders, lead the Israelites to their ancient inheritance. The beginning of the redemption will be in a natural way, by the desire of the Jews to settle in Palestine, and the willingness of the nations to help them in this work.”

When we consider that the Jewish holocaust was critical for the establishment of Israel, Messianism gives modern history a totally new twist. The holocaust likely was part of a plan to prepare the groundwork for the appearance of a Jewish Messiah.  After Jews had returned to Palestine and the Temple was rebuilt, “then will God show them all the miracles in accordance with the description given by the prophets and the sages…God will send His prophet and his anointed king,” Kalischer wrote. 


edmund.jpg(Edmund de Rothschild, on Israel 500 shekel note)

Albert Cohen, Edmund de Rothschild’s tutor, shared Kalischer’s views and imbued them in his pupil. As a result Edmund de Rothschild funded the Jewish colonization of Palestine in the 19th century.

Edmund de Rothschild engineered the famous Dreyfus Affair in order to create anti-Semitism and force Jews to support Israel as a refuge.

He established his own administration in Palestine, set up agricultural colonies and bought all the produce at a fixed price. Between 1887 and 1899, he made three trips to his many far flung settlements.

DEBT

The Rothschilds bend the nations to their will by means of debt. Moses relates the basic principle in Deuteronomy 15:6: “Thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shalt not reign over thee.”

The authors write: “Note that this is not a suggestion given in the Scriptures. It is a command from the God of Israel. Lending upon usury is how to possess the land.” (175)

“Lending on interest for consumer and emergency needs became a virtual Jewish monopoly in Western Europe between the 12th and 15th centuries…As security, real estate was most preferred. In this way Jews acquired in pledge houses, vineyards, farms, villages, castles, towns, and even provinces. ” (177)

“The rise of absolute monarchies in Central Europe brought numbers of Jews into the influential position of negotiating loans for the various royal courts. The phenomenon of court Jews now continued into Europe. The most famous included Lehmann, Oppenheimer and Goldschmidt in Germany and Austria.” (180)

“Jean Izolulet, a member of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universal wrote in 1932: ‘The meaning of history of the last century is that today 300 Jewish financiers, all masters of lodges, rule the world.” (183)

“Vatican City came under Rothschild influence in the early 19th century…Pope John Paul II admitted the Roman Catholic Church is still tied to the Rothschilds…In Sept 1979, the Pope revealed the Church had $50 billion invested in various Rothschild banks…” (191)

CONCLUSION

Edmund de Rothschild was playing a role in a larger drama which would see his successor finally become the anti-Christ. This required that Jews return to Palestine, and that required a huge Rothschild-organized pogrom in Europe. (see “Hitler was a Godsend for Israel” )

The author of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion repeatedly refers to world conquest in terms of “when we have come into our kingdom.” I am convinced he was a Rothschild.

Jewish Messianism throws both historical and current events into new perspective. Through debt, the Rothschild syndicate is bending the nations of the world to their will. Through the “Arab Spring” and the destruction of Libya and Syria, stragglers are brought into line. Finally, Iran may be brought to heel in a war pitting Rothschild’s NATO client states against Iran and possibly Russia and China, also client states.

The Cabalist Jewish bankers (the Illuminati) have a long-range plan for the ascendance of their “Messiah.”  Actually the antichrist, he will be “the King of the Jews” to be selected from the House of Rothschild. Unfortunately, the “Messiah” who will emerge from this turmoil will not redeem the world. Rather he will condemn mankind to centuries of suffering and darkness. Most Jews are not privy to this plan.

We have the dubious honor of witnessing the consummation of a centuries-old plan for world tyranny based on satanic megalomania and demented Biblical prophesies.

Is Putin False Opposition?

starofputin.jpgThe Illuminati is using Russia-US friction over Ukraine
to lay the groundwork for World War Three.
The dialectical opposition between Russia
and the US is a little too neat to be credible.

It’s almost as if the USSR and the USA have changed
places.

In March, when Hillary Clinton compared Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler, she was preparing the framework for World War Three.

Like the Second World War, the potential Third will represent resistance to Masonic Jewish world hegemony.  It will pit nationalists against (Zionist) “globalists.” The only question is whether, like Hitler, Putin represents “false opposition.”

The Protocols of Zion  stated, “Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us it is only pro forma at out discretion and by our direction…” (9)

Is this still true? My sense is that it is. Russia has a Rothschild central bank. Putin confers with Henry Kissinger regularly.

All wars are orchestrated. The globalists would not risk a world war in which they could be destroyed.

PUTIN THE WHITE KNIGHT

Writing for The American Free Press & The Barnes Report , Michael Collins Piper shows how Putin is the dialectical opposite of the satanic Zionist West, just like Hitler and Stalin were opposite twins.

putinfaith.jpg(left. Putin proclaims his new found faith)

In the midst of all of the media frenzy targeting Putin, the bottom line is that Putin and Russia are being hammered relentlessly because Putin is viewed as an ideologically-based force representing a long-standing, deeply rooted Russian nationalist ideology, one closely bound to the Orthodox Christian faith.

Not in modern times has there been one such as Putin, rising up to challenge what is known as the New World Order and the war on Christian tradition. A careful survey of the elite media in recent weeks underscores the fact that the global elite are very much concerned about the nationalist ideology taking hold in Russia under Putin.

For popular consumption, warmongering Republican Arizona demagogue Sen. John McCain wrote in The New York Times on March 14: “Russia is not a great power on par with America. It is a gas station run by a corrupt, autocratic regime.”

His inflammatory comments were echoed remarks during the 2012 presidential campaign when GOP candidate Mitt Romney called Russia “without question our No. 1 geopolitical foe,” an extraordinary pronouncement revealing what the hard-line Zionist neoconservatives telling Romney what to say were thinking.

Putin has earned the wrath of the would-be world shapers among the likes of those who make up such high-level instruments of geopolitical planning such as the Bilderberg group, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations. He has also offended the sensibilities of the interconnected Jewish families and financial groups that make up the driving force behind an intended global Zionist imperium based in Israel but wielding its power across the planet.”

On March 30 the Washington Post featured a commentary by Anne Applebaum–another Jewish critic of Putin– entitled “Russia’s anti-Western thinking takes hold.” She wrote: Russia’s ideology may be a mishmash: the old Soviet critique of hypocritical “bourgeois democ- racy,” plus some anti-Europeanism, some anti-globalism and a homophobic twist for contemporary appeal. But let’s not assume that competition between ideas is absurd and old- fashioned. And let’s not pretend that ideologies don’t matter, because, even if we’d prefer otherwise, they do.

gessen.jpgThe next day, on March 31, the Washington Post published a column by Russian-born Jewish journalist Masha Gessen, left, who asserted that Putin’s mission is “saving the world from the West.” Gessen wrote: “Over the past two years, a new ideology has taken shape at the Kremlin. Insistently pushed out over the airwaves of state-controlled television, it has taken hold as Russia’s national idea–and is the driving force behind its newly aggressive international posture. Russia is remaking itself as the leader of the anti-Western world.”

Does all of this foreshadow war against Russia? That remains to be seen.

PUTIN WEARS THE WHITE HAT

Clearly Russia is on the side of the angels in this conflict. The Jewish NeoCons who spearhead the Masonic Jew World Order are guilty of aggression in Ukraine, as they have been everywhere else. They will have a hard time marshaling support domestically or even abroad. In a recent issue of World Affairs Brief, Joel Skousen notes that the Germans are losing patience with the US.

Part of the problem in getting the Germans to spurn Russian energy and trade ties is the growing hostility toward America as well as German dependence on Russian fuel and natural gas. After the NSA spying scandal broke, the German Interior Minister said, “the USA is operating without any kind of boundaries.” He also mentioned that “approval ratings for Americans in German polls are lower right now than they have been in a long time. The last time this was the case was during a certain phase of the policies of George W. Bush.”

Der Spiegel said that, “Germany is pulling closer to Russia out of its own self-interest and disgust with the U.S. We are so used to thinking of Germany as allied with the U.S. against Russia, this may be hard for most Americans to conceive. But this is how alliances change–with a first step.

How much easier to destroy the US than when it’s clearly in the wrong? When its best generals have been purged and women are in combat? This may be the agenda – which a war which the US will lose, a perfect opportunity to purge “dissidents’ and cull the population.

On the other hand, the US has been exercising remarkable restraint with mostly bluster and meaningless sanctions. Russia also has been careful to avoid confrontation.  Having secured essential Black Sea access, it is in no hurry to annex Eastern Ukraine. The accord negotiated in Geneva recently
shows that, whatever the Illuminati have planned, the minions holding the levers of power in East and West have no appetite for war.

putinandjews.jpgIs Putin false opposition?

Yes. But, at the same time, the differences between East and West seem real. They represent two Masonic mafias, one pretending to be nationalist and religious, the other proudly satanic. But the Russian mob will not agree to being exploited and controlled by the Zionist mob.

As Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin said in an interview with Charlie Rose, we want to be equal and not “Junior” partners with the West. Whether this foreshadows war with Russia, as Piper says, remains to be seen.

A final note. We should forget the “Polish Presidential plane crash” in Smolensk in April 2010 when Putin presided over the murder of the Polish nationalist elite. The fact that no Western leaders attended the funeral indicates that this was done with Illuminati approval. This is another indication that Putin is a member of the club.

Russia Bashing Continues

Washington bears full responsibility for Ukrainian crisis conditions. Russia alone has gone all-out to resolve them responsibly.

Putin and Sergei Lavrov deserve Nobel Peace Prize recognition. War criminals alone get it. Obama is Exhibit A.

Ukraine

US bullying, bluster, and threats continue. Brazen lies repeat. Sanctions were imposed. Obama threatened more saying:

“My hope is we do actually see follow-through over the next several days, but I don’t think, given past performance, that we can count on that, and we have to be prepared to potentially respond to what continues to be efforts of interference by the Russians in eastern and southern Ukraine.”

Neocons infest Washington. National Security Advisor Susan Rice is one of the worst.

“We expect and we will be watching whether Russia does or does not uphold its responsibility to use its very considerable influence to restrain and withdraw those irregular militia from the buildings and spaces that they’ve occupied,” she said.

“If we don’t see action commensurate with the commitments that Russia has made yesterday in Geneva, which we all welcome, then obviously we’ve been very clear that we and our European partners remain ready to impose additional costs on Russia for failing to adhere to its obligations.”

Eastern Ukraine freedom fighters reject Kiev putschists. Putin and Lavrov call them illegitimate.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki saying usurping power “was not a coup.” A “vacuum of leadership” was filled, she claimed.

Russia has a “responsibility” to “de-escalate” Eastern Ukraine crisis conditions and implement Thursday’s four-party agreement, she added. Otherwise, she warned, they’ll be “consequences.”

“We’re going to test (Russia) over the coming days (on) whether the accord sticks, whether it will be implemented,” she added.

“(T)he president (and) Secretary Kerry (see) a strong connection between these separatists and Russia. (Moscow can) influence (them) and change the situation on the ground. There’s no question about that.”

“I will say we’re clear-eyed about Russia’s record of not implementing steps in the past, so we will see if they do take steps this time, and if they don’t take steps there will be consequences.”

“But I’m not going to put a date on that. We won’t know for a couple of days.”

Moscow reacted sharply. Putin press secretary Dmitry Peskov warned against new sanctions. He called imposing them “absolutely unacceptable.”

“One cannot treat Russia like it is a shameful student, and brandish a piece of paper on which we put crosses next to the duties it has accomplished.”

A separate Foreign Ministry statement was sharply critical. In part, it said:

“The assessments voiced in Washington regarding the meeting held between representatives of Russia, the US, Ukraine and the European Union are disappointing.”

“The US is trying persistently yet again to lighten the actions of the current Kiev authorities.”

“(T)he guilt for the Ukrainian crisis and its current escalation is put groundlessly on Russia…”

“(S)ome statements by US officials have ultimatums and they try to threaten us with sanctions and this is absolutely unacceptable.”

“It appears that sanction language substitutes normal diplomacy more and more for Washington.”

“The essence of the Geneva meeting was to send a clear signal to Kiev that the situation can be stabilized solely via the launch of comprehensive dialog with regions, especially those, where Russian-speaking residents prevail and whose opinion the central authorities should start listening to.”

“We expect that real actions of our Ukrainian and western partners amid the decisions made jointly in Geneva will be more in line with the content of the agreements reached.”

On April 18, Moscow’s EU ambassador Vladimir Chizhov said:

“We proceed from the fact that Ukraine needs a profound constitutional reform. Ukraine and its people deserve a better constitution than the one that is changed by each new president.”

“The work that has been done in Kiev until recently is the wrong path. A reform can be successful only when it takes into account the opinion of all regions, all political parties of a country.”

“It is absolutely natural. And such a reform should be carried out based on the referendum results.”

“I think there is no way a referendum can be avoided. The question is its format and essence.”

“Eastern regions insist that it should be held at the regional level. This is a difficult task. So, let us wait and see which solution will be found by Ukrainians.”

“As concerns federalization, the first step in this direction has already been made. After all, all the signatories to the Geneva documents agreed that decentralization was needed.”

“The main thing is not how to call this solution but how to implement it. It is vital that such a decision be passed openly, transparently and was accepted in all regions of the country.”

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Lavrov stresses “the of the immediate and complete fulfillment by the Ukrainian authorities of the Geneva statement provision that provide in particular non-use of force and the beginning of a nationwide dialogue on a new constitution involving all key political forces and Ukrainian regions.”

All sides must refrain from violence, intimidation and provocations. Lavrov said four-party representatives condemned (all) manifestations of extremism, racism and religious intolerance, including anti-Semitism.”

Russia’s Foreign Ministry added:

“The Americans are once again stubbornly trying to whitewash the actions of the Kiev authorities, who have embarked on a course of violently suppressing protesters in the southeast who are expressing their legitimate indignation over the infringements of their rights.”

On Friday, Kerry warned Lavrov. According to an unnamed senior State Department official, he holds Russia responsible for “full and immediate compliance” with four-party agreement terms.

“He made clear that the next few days would be a pivotal period for all sides to implement the statement’s provisions, particularly that all illegal armed groups must be disarmed and all illegally seized buildings must be returned to legitimate owners,” the official added.

Ukraine’s foreign minister Andriy Deschytsia warned Eastern Ukrainian activists. They’ll face “more concrete actions” in days if they don’t vacate occupied buildings.

People’s Republic of Donetsk Governor Denis Pushilin said Eastern Ukrainian freedom fighters weren’t represented in Geneva.

Kiev putschists usurped power lawlessly. He rejects them. He demands they resign.

“The Kiev junta is signing agreements and fulfilling none of them,” he said. “They are provoking crisis.”

Illegitimate putschist president Turchynov “committed a crime against his own people. We will keep going to the end.”

Georgy Muradov is Moscow’s Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) affairs deputy head. On Friday, he said:

Western countries are fighting “total war…Within the context of this policy, they are trying to give a final blow to the Commonwealth of Independent States.”

They want its total “disintegration.” Key members are being expelled. At issue is eliminating Russian allies.

The Ukrainian scenario may repeat if Russian nationals living abroad aren’t protected.

Illegitimate putschist National Security and Defense Council head Andriy Parubiy co-founded the ultranationalist neo-Nazi Social National party. It’s now called Svoboda.

He said Kiev intends withdrawing from CIS. Russia’s Foreign Ministry denounced the decision. Implementing it adversely affects millions of Ukrainians, it said.

Separately, Lavrov said:

“We are not keeping anyone in the CIS by force but this decision was made not for the benefits of the Ukrainian population but to stage another anti-Russian campaign of propagandistic nature. I don’t doubt that.”

The Warsaw, Poland-based Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) is the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s (OECD) main body involved with elections, human rights and democratization.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry denounced its biased position on Ukraine. It ignored Kiev’s latest human rights violation.

“It is outrageous there has been no official reaction from the ODIHR to Kiev’s discriminatory measure against Russian men aged 16 to 60, who have in fact been banned from entering the territory of Ukraine since April 17,” said Russia’s Foreign Ministry.

“The incomprehensible explanation of these actions taken by Ukraine as an OSCE member-state…was just shocking.”

“(T)he ODIHR has supported the provocative action against Russian citizens. This nearly total ban on visits by our citizens that the current authorities in Kiev have imposed cannot but cause indignation.”

“There have been many examples in history showing that such decisions are just one step away from persecution of other people on account of race.”

At the same time, ODIHR turned a blind eye to other flagrant Kiev abuses. Brutally beating Ukrainian presidential aspirant Oleg Tsarev was ignored.

“(O)ne cannot but feel indignant over (ODIHR’s) lack of proper reaction,” Russia’s Foreign Ministry added.

At the same time, it called OECD equating Kiev violence against journalists to Crimea’s media climate “absolutely unacceptable.”

At issue was OECD media representative Dunja Mijatovic’s statement. After visiting Ukraine in mid-April, she lied calling Crimea’s media climate “very dangerous.”

Russian journalists are vulnerable. They’ve been attacked. Some are barred from entering Ukraine. Russian TV channels are blocked.

Days earlier, assailants beat Evgeniy Polojii. He’s Panorama newspaper editor. Gorlovka.ua’s editor was kidnapped. So were Hromadske TV and RT International journalists.

Police states operate this way. Western media scoundrels ignore their crimes. So do ODIHR and OSCE officials.

Russia bashing continues relentlessly. The American Foreign Policy Council (AFPC) is a right-wing think tank. Neocons infest its Board of Advisors.

They include former CIA director James Woolsey and Newt Gingrich. Stephen Blank is a senior fellow.

On April 18, he headlined “Russia’s Lurch Toward Fascism.”

He outrageously accused Moscow of invading Ukraine. He lied saying Kremlin “attempts to destroy the foundations of Ukrainian statehood, sovereignty, and territorial integrity are also aimed at Russia’s domestic opposition to Putin.”

“It represents the culmination of his campaign to suppress political dissent under a wave of officially imposed quasi-religious nationalism akin to that of the later Tsars and (more recently) to the late Stalin and late Brezhnev periods.”

He accused Moscow of “fulminat(ing) against ‘supposed’ neo-Nazis and anti-Semites terrorizing Ukraine…”

He ignored clear evidence proving it. “But what we really see emerging are clear (Moscow) aspects of fascism,” he claimed.

Russian democracy shames America’s sham version. Monied interests control things. People have no say.

Neocon fascists infest Washington. They’re in Europe. They influence policy. They hold high government positions.

They ignore popular sentiment. They enforce police state laws. They target independent governments.

They want them toppled. They want pro-Western puppet regimes replacing them.

Putin and Western leaders are geopolitical opposites. Doing the right thing isn’t tolerated. Supporting responsible global policies made him public enemy number one.

Blank lies for power. “Putin’s Russia resembles its fascist predecessors,” he said.

His “actions in Ukraine show (he) can now only move forward to more attacks, threats, and ever intensifying repression that ends in crisis and stagnation,” he added.

Putin’s Russia is polar opposite his assessment. It applies solely to Washington, its rogue allies, and installed puppet regimes. Don’t expect Blank to explain.

Separately, Stars and Stripes headlined “Report: US ground troops to be sent to Poland, Estonia,” saying:

Deployment is planned “for a series of upcoming ground exercises aimed at reassuring allies shaken by Russian intervention in neighboring Ukraine.”

No intervention whatever exists. Moscow plans none. Claims otherwise ring hollow. Russia bashing continues.

US-led NATO plans call for encroaching close to its borders. It’s threatening its heartland.

Last week, NATO said its Eastern European land, sea and air presence will increase. Doing so is provocative.

According to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, “an entire range of possibilities and measures are being considered.”

Hegemons operate this way. Washington exceeds the worst of earlier ones.

Meet the Men Who Rule the WorId

Where’s the fashionable rendezvous for the World Secret Government? In the good old days when the Illuminati had a firm grip on things, it was wherever the Bilderbergers decided to pitch their tents. Then Nelson and David Rockefeller horned their way in, and the spotlight moved to the Trilateral Commission. Was there one Secret Government or two? Some said all the big decisions were taken in England, at Ditchley, not so far from the Appeasers’ former haunts at Cliveden and only an hour by Learjet from Davos, which is where jumped-up finance ministers and arriviste tycoons merely pretend they rule the world.

 

Secret World Rulers spend a good deal of time in the air, whisking from Davos to APEC meetings somewhere in Asia, to Ditchley, to Sun Valley, Idaho, though mercifully no longer to the Clinton-favored Renaissance Weekend in Hilton Head, South Carolina. But comes next July 14 and every self-respecting member of the Secret World Government will be in a gloomy grove of redwoods in northern California, preparing to Banish Care for the hundred and twenty-second time, prelude to three weeks hashing out the future of the world.

If the avenging posses mustered by the Bohemian Grove Action Network manage this year to burst through the security gates at the Bohemian Grove, they will (to extrapolate from numerous eyewitness accounts of past sessions) find proofs most convincing to them that here indeed is the ruling crowd in executive session: hundreds of near-dead white men sitting by a lake listening to Henry Kissinger, plus many other near-dead white men in adjacent landscape in a state of intoxication so advanced that many of them have fallen insensible among the ferns, gin fizz glasses gripped firmly till the last.

These same gaping posses would find evidence of bizarre rites, though not perhaps the Satanic sacrifice of children, as proposed in one new documentary. Why so many games of dominoes? Why the evidence that a significant portion of the Secret Government appeared to be involved in some theatrical production involving the use of women’s clothes and lavish application of makeup?

Many an empire has, of course, been run by drunken men wearing makeup. But a look at the Bohemian Club, its members and appurtenances, suggests that behind the pretense of Secret Government lies the reality of a summer camp for a bunch of San Francisco businessmen, real estate plungers and lawyers who long ago had the cunning to recruit some outside megawattage- Herbert Hoover, a Rockefeller, Richard Nixon-to turn their mundane frolics into the simulacrum of Secret Government and make the yokels gape.

The Bohemian Club began as a San Francisco institution in 1872, founded by journalists and kindred lowly scriveners as an excuse for late-night boozing. The hacks soon concluded that Bohemianism, in the sense of real poverty, was oppressive. So they pulled in a few wealthy men of commerce to pay for the champagne, and the rot set in. Within a very few years the lowly scriveners were on their way out- except for a few of the more presentable among them to lend a pretense of Boho-dom-and Mammon had seized power.

Near the end of the last century the cult of the redwood grove as Nature’s cathedral was in full swing, and the Boho-businessmen yearned to give their outings a tincture of spiritual uplift. The long range planning committee of the club decided to buy a grove some sixty miles north of the city near the town of Monte Rio. Soon the ancient redwoods rang to the laughter of the disporting men of commerce.

The Bohemian Club is set up along frat house lines. Instead of Deltas and Pi Etas there are camps, some 120 in all, stretching along River Road and Morse Stephens canyon. Their names follow the imaginative arc of American industrialists and financiers over the past hundred years, from Hillbillies (George Bush Sr., Walter Cronkite, William F. Buckley) to Ye Merrie Yowls.

The waiting lists for membership are so long it takes years for the novitiate to be admitted. A friend of mine, big in Reagan’s time, has been on the doorstep for fifteen years. He says he likes it that way. He’s spared the sign-up fee of around $10,000 and annual membership dues and has to pony up only when he’s invited, which is every two years. Particularly in the more sumptuous camps it takes plenty of money too, sharing bills for retinues of uniformed servants, vintage cellars, master chefs and kindred accoutrements of spiritual refreshment.

There are lakeside talks and increasingly popular science chats at the Grove’s museum. There’s skeet-shooting on the private range. There’s endless dominoes-the Grove’s board game par excellence. There’s Not Being at Home With the Wife. But best of all, there are the talent revue and the play. Visit some corporate suite in San Francisco in June or early July, and if you see the CEO brooding thoughtfully before his plate-glass window overlooking the Bay Bridge, the chances are he is not thinking about some impending takeover or merciless downsizing. He is probably worrying about the cut of his tutu for the drag act for which he has been rehearsing keenly for many months.

In the nineties the Grove’s reputation as the site of Secret Government was in eclipse. The young Christian zealots of the Newt revolution were scarcely Boho material, and Newt himself-he did give a lakeside talk one year-was a little too tacky in style for the gin fizz set. But here we are in the Bush II era, and the Bush Clan is echt Secret Government, all the way from the old Rockefeller connection to Skull and Bones and the Knights of Malta. Dick Cheney’s a Grover.

White Minority Status a Political Time Bomb

majority-minority.jpg

Studies show that Whites vote Republican when confronted
with the prospect of becoming a minority. But instead of
exploiting this potent issue, the GOP is urged to abandon
their base and cater to the future majority.

 

 

“We will undermine every collective identity except our own.” – The Protocols of Zion
“Collective identity” refers to race, religion (God), nation and family (gender). Obviously the GOP are Freemasons
or this would be an issue. Kevin MacDonald shows that academia is actively conspiring with the Illuminati.

“We will undermine every collective identity except our own.” 
 
 [“Collective identity” refers to race, religion (God), nation and family (gender)] – Protocols of Zion, the blueprint of the New World Order   They promote immigration, homosexuality and miscegenation to destroy the white race.  

– See more at: http://henrymakow.com/obamas-coalition-of-the-have-n.html#sthash.RNY3zuAX.dpuf

It’s one thing to be demonized when you are the majority, but a far different thing when you are the minority.

A study* by Northwestern University psychologists Maureen A. Craig (a white woman) and Jennifer A. Richeson (an
African-American) shows that Whites are on the “precipice” of becoming a minority in America, and are becoming more conservative as a result. [US Census indicates White babies are now a minority.]

Needless to say, despite Craig-Richeson’s use of the word “precipice”, they do not view whites’ impending minority status as problematic. Indeed, they are eager to suggest ways to make Whites complacent about their fate…

The Craig-Richeson study illuminates … why the Republican Party is rapidly becoming de facto the party of White America: American politics is simply becoming racialized as a result of identity politics. In the 2012 election, a majority of Whites of all social classes, both sexes, and all age groups voted Republican. Obama won only 36% of the votes of non-college whites–a group that traditionally voted Democrat when social class issues were paramount…

For reasons that would bear analysis, GOP strategists ignore this possibility. But the Craig-Richeson study suggests that this GOP whitening trend will accelerate anyway, as it becomes increasingly difficult for whites to escape diversity. When the effects of the immigration tsunami are all around, it begins to dawn on people that their country is being taken away…

Craig and Richeson found that Whites confronted with their impending minority status are concerned that their social status will suffer, and this motivates their attraction to conservatism. Craig’s reaction is particularly blatant:

“These findings may be particularly relevant to media and government agencies who are currently reporting on these racial shifts, presumably without awareness of these potential threat effects,” Craig told Association for Psychological Science. “We’re working on ways to present information regarding these very real and important shifts in the country’s racial demographics that don’t engender these type of threat responses and, instead, promote positive relations among members of the majority and minority groups.”

You see, Craig, along with the rest of the academic Establishment, is entirely on board with eliminating America’s white majority through immigration policy. So the problem, as they see it, is not how to prevent the shifts, but how to make them palatable. How can the fears of white Americans be made to disappear so they won’t be drawn to the evil that is inherent in conservative political opinions and the Republican Party? How can White America be induced to embrace the harmonious multicultural future as America enters the golden age of diversity (and White America heads into the sunset)?

Craig and Richeson added a condition where some subjects read a paragraph reassuring them that white social status “is unlikely to change” even after whites become a minority (the “assuaged threat condition”).

Voilà! Simply add a reassuring paragraph and the status-threat disappears! Frame the issue by reassuring whites that they will not suffer economically from becoming a minority, and they will be more likely to endorse Leftist nostrums approved by academic and MSM elites….

RACIAL POLARIZATION

American racial and ethnic landscape is already well on the way to polarization. Already an average of 80% of non-Whites voted for Obama in the last election. Whites have been relatively less polarized, even though 60% voting Republicanin recent elections. But all the indications are that they are becoming more so. Not only are the majority of Whites of all social classes, both sexes, and all age groups voting Republican, as I mentioned above, but Republicans are increasing their share of the White vote by 1.5% in every presidential election cycle since 1992.[ “Does GOP Have to Pass Immigration Reform?, By Sean Trende,RealClearPolitics, June 25, 2013]

This is occurring despite a virtual blackout of discussion of the impending white minority in the MSM. Imagine how quickly polarization would increase if the racial shift were emphasized–and especially the downside for Whites. Imagine how hard it would be to sell the immigration amnesty/surge bill to white America if its acceleration of the racial shift were publicized.

The general lack of awareness also shows that there is a huge untapped source of conservative strength in the US: Accentuating the impending eclipse of White America would result in an upsurge of support for conservative positions on a wide range of issues.

The fact that the subjects in these experiments seemed unaware of these population shifts prior to the experiment is a telling testimony to the power of the MSM in shaping perceptions. Deciding what’s not fit to print is at least as important as what is fit to print.

So it’s no accident that the MSM is intensively policed to eliminate voices that conflict with the Leftist world view–people like Pat Buchanan, Glenn Beck, and Lou Dobbs. This is why Media Matters was so upset when CNN quoted VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow and James Edwards on immigration-related issues. [CNN Article Legitimizes “Pro-White” Commentators, by Todd Gregory, March 4, 2011]

And of course the Establishment Conservative media is no better. It’s interesting that when New York Magazine’s  Jonathan Chait reviewed studies on the effects of liberal domination of the entertainment media, he reported that conservative talk radio and Fox News harp on “the fears that torment conservatives today–overweening regulators, welfare layabouts, the government seizing our guns” –anything but the fear of becoming a minority. [The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy Is on Your Screen, August 19, 2012]

The political landscape would change rather quickly and dramatically if one above-ground, widely available, well-funded, MSM outlet told the truth.

But the data show that the landscape is changing anyway. Despite the MSM, Whites are waking up to the reality of their dispossession, even if the changes are slow. In the next 30 years, fewer and fewer whites will be able to escape the consequences of the immigration onslaught. The political landscape will continue to be more racially polarized. Whites will be looking for leadership that addresses their fears. Conservatism Inc. boilerplate about government regulation,welfare queens and even gun rights won’t hack it. Politicians like Jeb Bush, and the others who came to genuflect before Sheldon Adelson won’t cut it.

What will appeal to these whites–the great majority of whites–is explicit talk about white identity and white interests.

It will be a revolution.

William S. Burroughs’ Wild Ride with Scientology

William S. Burroughs’ Wild Ride with Scientology12SEXPAND

You probably knew that William S. Burroughs had experimented with some unusual ideas during his time — but did you know he joined the Church of Scientology? Pop Apocalypse author and English professor Lee Konstantinou reveals the secret history of how Burroughs almost became an Operating Thetan.

In 1959, the same year Olympia Press published his most famous novel Naked Lunch, the writer William S. Burroughs visited the restaurant of his friend and collaborator, Brion Gysin, in Tangiers. There, Burroughs met John and Mary Cooke, a wealthy American hippie couple who were interested in mysticism. Burroughs recalled, “There was something portentous about it, as though I was seeing them in another medium, like they were sitting there as holograms.”

Who were these portentous holograms? Scientologists. Indeed, John Cooke is reported to have been the very first person to receive a status of “Clear” within Scientology, and was deeply involved in its founding. Cooke had been trying to recruit Gysin into the Church, declaring that the artist was a natural “Clear” and “Operating Thetan.” Ultimately, it was Burroughs, not Gysin, who explored the Church that L. Ron Hubbard built. Burroughs took Scientology so seriously that he became a “Clear” and almost became an “Operating Thetan.”

On a research trip to the New York Public Library, I discovered that Burroughs had left behind a rich paper trail documenting his exploration of the science-fiction inspired Church.

I was looking into Burroughs’ life as part of a bigger project about his influence on punk, which led me to the the Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection at the NYPL. The William S. Burroughs Papers have a range of amazing materials related to Burroughs’s exploration of Scientology, including extensive handwritten notes Burroughs took on Scientological training materials, notes from auditing sessions Burroughs conducted, and even a cut-up of auditing questions.

William S. Burroughs’ Wild Ride with Scientology

According to his biographer, Barry Miles, Burroughs very quickly incorporated Scientology into his worldview. In an October 27, 1959 letter to Allen Ginsberg, Burroughs wrote: “The method of directed recall is the method of Scientology. You will recall I wrote urging you to contact local chapter and find an auditor. They do the job without hypnosis or drugs, simply run the tape back and forth until the trauma is wiped off. It works. I have used the method—partially responsible for recent changes.” Burroughs thought that the Church was teaching techniques that might help him resist social control by erasing negative images called “engrams” and its ideas came to inform his art.

Only two days later, Burroughs wrote again to Ginsberg: “I have a new method of writing and do not want to publish anything that has not been inspected and processed. I cannot explain this method to you until you have necessary training. So once again and most urgently (believe me there is not much time)—I tell you: ‘Find a Scientology Auditor and have yourself run.'” Scientology appears throughout Burroughs’s oeuvre, and especially in his innovative cut-up trilogy of the sixties and in the avant-garde films he made with Gysin.

Again and again in his writings and interviews, Burroughs mentions the E-meter as Scientology’s most important contribution to a science of the mind. The E-meter, Burroughs thought, was “really a sort of sloppy form of electrical brain stimulation… a lie-detector and a mind-reading machine… Not the content, only the reactions.” Elsewhere Burroughs described the E-meter as a “useful device for deconditioning,” or the elimination of imposed or habitual reactions of symbols and figures. The goal is to achieve something like a “floating needle,” a therapeutic method Burroughs claimed to sometimes use. In his book of interviews, The Job, Burroughs explained his view that Scientology could help counter “the Reactive Mind… an ancient instrument of control designed to stultify and limit the potential for action in a constructive or destructive direction.” Burroughs associated the Reactive Mind with Mayan calendars, which he described in the same interview as “one of the most precise and hermetic control calendars ever… on this planet, a calendar that in effect controlled what the populace did thought and felt on any day.”

In 1961, Burroughs created a short film in collaboration with Gysin called Towers Open Fire(warning: NSFW!), which was a plotless film designed to show the process of control systems breaking down-showing Burroughs, in camouflage and a gas mask, firing an “orgasm gun”; a boy in underwear; a spinning Dream Machine; a shot of a man masturbating; among other disturbing images. Gysin’s biographer notes that the film even used snippets of dialog taken from a Scientology pamphlet.

Scientology appears again disguised as the “Logos” group in Burroughs’s 1962 novel The Ticket That Exploded. As described in the book, Logos has “a system of therapy they call ‘clearing’. You ‘run’ traumatic material which they call ‘engrams’ until it loses emotional connotation through repetitions and is then refilled as neutral memory’ When all the ‘engrams’ have been run and deactivated the subject becomes a ‘clear.'” In the 1964 novel Nova Express, Scientology is for the first time openly described in Burroughs’s fiction. During an interrogation scene in the book, an unnamed character declares “The Scientologists believe sir that words recorded during a period of unconsciousness… store pain and that this pain store can be lugged in with key words represented as an alternate mathematical formulae indicating umber of exposures to the key words and reaction index… they call these words recorded during unconsciousness engrams sir… The pain that overwhelms that person is basic basic sir and when basic basic is wiped off the tape… then that person becomes what they call clear sir.”

William S. Burroughs’ Wild Ride with ScientologySEXPAND

At the start of 1968, Burroughs deepened his relationship to the Church. He took an intense two-month Scientology Clearing Course at the world headquarters of Scientology in Saint Hill Manor in the UK and Burroughs was declared a “Clear,” though he later claimed that he had to work hard to suppress or rationalize his persistently negative feelings toward L. Ron Hubbard during auditing sessions. The Berg has almost a dozen files filled with Burroughs’s pamphlets from Saint Hill as well as his almost unreadable hand-written notes on Scientology courses and questions he prepared for auditing sessions he himself conducted. These files include, as I’ve mentioned, an attempt to create a cut-up from auditing questions; from the start, Scientology was very much connected to the cut-up technique and Burroughs’s theory that language constituted a kind of virus that had infested the human host. At Saint Hill, Burroughs entered an intense and obsessive period of auditing sessions with an E-Meter, including a process of exploring past lives, though he slowly began to grow alienated from the Church and what he considered its Orwellian security protocols. Burroughs’s antipathy for Scientological “Sec Checks” are apparent in his strange and violent story, “Ali’s Smile,” which was published in the collection Ali’s Smile/Naked Scientology.

Burroughs eventually rejected Scientology—because of what he called “the fascist policies of Hubbard and his organization”—but cautiously endorsed some of its “discoveries.” His break with the Church developed over course of the late sixties in the pages of the London-based magazine, Mayfair, where Burroughs wrote a series of increasingly hostile “bulletins” about his adventures with the organization. These bulletins culminated in Burroughs’s amusingly titledMayfair article, “I, William Burroughs, Challenge You, L. Ron Hubbard.” This piece was republished in the Los Angeles Free Press. In his challenge to L. Ron, Burroughs wrote:

Some of the techniques [of Scientology] are highly valuable and warrant further study and experimentation. The E Meter is a useful device… (many variations of this instrument are possible). On the other hand I am in flat disagreement with the organizational policy. No body of knowledge needs an organizational policy. Organizational policy can only impede the advancement of knowledge. There is a basic incompatibility between any organization and freedom of thought.

For his inquiries, Burroughs reports, he was expelled from the organization and in 1968 was put into what Scientologists call a condition of “Treason“; though the exact circumstances surrounding this incident remain unclear. Burroughs’s public battle against the Church continued in a 1972 issue of Rolling Stone, where he expressed his support for Robert Kaufmann’s exposé, Inside Scientology, published by Olympia Press. Here Burroughs uses his harshest language yet: “Scientology is a model control system, a state in fact with its own courts, police, rewards and penalties.” Strangely enough, despite his break with the group, Scientology reappeared in the 1972 film Bill and Tony, which Burroughs made with Antony Balch (the masturbating guy in Towers Open Fire). In Bill and Tony, an image of Burroughs’s disembodied floating head recites instructions for how to operate an auditing session.

So what are we supposed to make of all this? On one level it’s hard to say, but what ought to be abundantly clear is that Burroughs took Scientology quite seriously indeed for the better part of a decade—during what was arguably his most artistically fertile period. Burroughs clearly had his own uses for Scientology. Gysin once quipped that Burroughs was probably the first person to make more money from Scientology than the organization made from him. This may be true, but Burroughs wasn’t investigating the Church cynically. Today, where so much attention focuses on the science fictional origins of Scientology, it is easy to forget how seemingly in harmony the Church was with a whole range of countercultural, “New Age,” and anti-psychiatric practices in the Sixties.

What becomes clear when you listen to Burroughs talking about Scientology is that he associated the group with a range of mind-expanding and mind-freeing practices: Wilhelm Reich’s trippy Orgone Accumulator, which Jack Kerouac wrote about in On the Road; Mayan calendrical mind control systems; hallucinogens (especially the plant yagé) and other powerful mind-altering drugs; apomorphine, which he used several times to treat his drug addiction; the rambling, sarcastic monologues he called “routines”; the Dream Machine Burroughs invented with Gysin, a machine that supposedly could simulate “alpha-waves”; and of course his ultimate weapon in the Burroughs arsenal, the cut-up, which was designed to jam up what he called “the Reality Studio,” aka the everyday, conditioned, mind-controlled reality. If you spend enough time digging through Burroughs’s writing, you get the sense that Burroughs thought he lived in a very literally real science fictional world.

Absent from Burroughs’s writing are any references to body thetans, Xenu, the Galactic Confederacy, Douglas DC-8 airliners, volcanic hydrogen bombs, or other beliefs more recently associated with Scientology, thanks to the South Park episode, “Trapped in the Closet” and Lawrence Wright’s epically long New Yorker article on the defection of the film director Paul Haggis from the church). It’s too bad Burroughs didn’t achieve a higher OT level; he could have mined Scientology’s madcap space opera as a source for even more mind-bending books.

Lee Konstantinou is author of the novel Pop Apocalypse and a professor at the University of Maryland at College Park. This io9 Flashback originally appeared in 2011.