Bloomberg at Harvard

He’s a multi-billionaire. He made money the old-fashioned way. On March 24, 2014, Forbes ranked him 16th on its World Billionaire List. It estimates his net worth at $33 billion.

He’s founder and 88% owner of Bloomberg LP. It’s a global financial data/media company. He’s a Johns Hopkins/Harvard Business School graduate.

Harvard

From January 1, 2002 – December 31, 2013, he was New York City mayor. On March 5, Harvard University named him 2014 commencement speaker. It’s scheduled for May 29.

Choosing him follows Harvard tradition. Rare exceptions occur. Last year Oprah Winfrey spoke. She’s an African-American multi-billionaire.

She’s connected to America’s rich and powerful. She promoted Bush’s Iraq war on air. She disgracefully called it a “humanitarian mission.”

She omitted key facts. She sold millions of viewers imperial war. She did so with fabricated reasons. She lied for power. It wasn’t the first time or last.

She appeals to America’s lowest common denominator. She’s a faux progressive. She teamed with Obama during campaigning.

They conned Americans. Uninformed ones were sold false promises. Oprah bears much responsibility. Don’t expect her to explain.

Previous Harvard commencement speakers include rich and powerful notables. In 2007, Bill Gates was invited.

The Harvard Crimson called him “Harvard’s most successful dropout.” Admirers and detractors call him unbelievably wealthy. Other Harvard commencement speakers included:

• former Supreme Court Justice David Souter,

• former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan,

• former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo,

• Alan Greenspan,

• Paul Volker,

• Madeleine Albright,

• Colin Powell,

• Helmut Kohl,

• Helmet Schmidt,

• Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, and

• Winston Churchill among many other likeminded figures.

Nary a progressive in sight. Rarely ever is one invited. Nowadays it’s strictly verboten.

In June 1956, Jack Kennedy addressed Harvard’s commencement. He was Massachusetts junior senator at the time.

An earlier article discussed his address. Today’s politicians don’t speak like he did. Perhaps Harvard regretted inviting him.

He accused politicians of sacrificing truth for political advantage. Little wonder they’re scorned, he said. He wanted politicians and scholars working together cooperatively.

He wanted elected officials freed from “imprison(ment) by (their) own slogans.” He wanted “the cooling waters of the scholastic pool” lowering the temperature in Washington.

He called it “regrettable that the gap between the intellectual and the politician seems to be growing.”

He said “if more politicians knew poetry and more poets knew politics, I am convinced the world would be a little better place in which to live on this commencement day of 1956.”

Kennedy differed from today’s politicians. A previous article explained as follows:

He changed during his time in office. He evolved from cold warrior to peacemaker.

The Bay of Pigs fiasco chastened him. He refused authorizing another attempt to remove Castro.

He supported Palestinian rights. He opposed Israel’s nuclear weapons program. He offended energy giants. He wanted their oil depletion allowance cut or eliminated.

RFK waged war on organized crime. JFK’s first executive order expanded the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). He was a gradualist on civil rights. He believed integration was morally right.

He favored Federal Reserve reform. His Executive Order 11110 authorized replacing Federal Reserve notes with silver certificates if the occasion arose to do so.

It’s believed he ordered Treasury Secretary C. Douglas Dillon to begin issuing United States notes. Perhaps he had in mind replacing Federal Reserve ones altogether. He was assassinated too soon to know.

He deplored the CIA. He fired director Allen Dulles. He sacked his deputy General Charles Cabell.

He wanted to “splinter the (agency) into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds,” he said. It was reason enough to kill him.

He increasingly opposed imperial wars. Initially, he sent troops and advisors to Southeast Asia. He opposed sending more to Laos. He wanted conflict resolved diplomatically.

He opposed deploying nuclear weapons in Berlin. He was against using them in Southeast Asia.

He once called Pentagon generals “crazy” for suggesting it. He refused to attack or invade Cuba during the 1962 missile crisis. He said he “never had the slightest intension of doing so.”

He urged abolishing all nuclear weapons. He knew using them is lunacy. He favored general and complete disarmament.

He opposed Pax Americana enforced dominance. He signed the Limited Test Ban Treaty with Soviet Russia.

Weeks before his assassination, he signed National Security Memorandum 263. It called for removing 1,000 US forces from Vietnam by yearend. He wanted them all out by December 1965.

He underwent a spiritual transformation. It bears repeating. He switched from cold warrior to peacemaker.

He was at odds with Pentagon commanders, CIA, most congressional members, and nearly all his advisors.

He understood his vulnerability. He paid with his life. He was favored to win reelection. Imagine if he had two full terms.

Imagine a new direction. Imagine deploring war. Imagine turning swords into plowshares.

Imagine a world at peace. Imagine nuclear disarmament. Imagine ending the Cold War a generation earlier.

Imagine a chance to keep it from reemerging. Killing Kennedy, brother Bobby, Martin Luther King, and Malcolm X decapitated the political left. New leadership hasn’t materialized.

It’s needed now more than ever. It’s nowhere in sight. Potential candidates aren’t welcome as Harvard commencement speakers.

President Drew Faust invited Bloomberg. He’s a multi-billionaire corporatist. She praised what demands condemnation. He “led one of the world’s great cities,” she said.

He “built one of the nation’s most influential information services, and generously committed his attention and resources to worthy causes in public health, the environment, civic life, the arts, and – not least of all – education. I greatly look forward to welcoming him in May.”

He took plenty and then some. He gave back crumbs. He did so to buy recognition. Honor and integrity are earned, not bought. Faust ignored the distinction.

Throughout his business and public careers, he served powerful monied interests. He did so exclusively. He profited handsomely himself.

He ignored public need. He won elections the old-fashioned way. He bought them. He spent millions. He outspent challengers multiple times over. He flooded the airwaves with campaign ads.

He drowned out opposition voices. He used deep pocket money power to win. He’s Wall Street’s man. He’s a product of its predatory system.

He was weaned at Solomon Brothers. In 1973, he became a general partner. He headed equity trading. He earned millions.

In 1981, he used them to launch Innovative Market Systems. In 1987, he renamed it Bloomberg LP. Thereafter, he established Bloomberg News, Bloomberg Message, and Bloomberg Tradebook.

He has his own radio network. WBBR AM New York is its flagship station. His public record was deplorable.

Among America’s 25 largest cities, New York unemployment is among the highest.

Most city workers lack pensions. Many earn sub-subsistence wages. Poverty is extremely high. It rose annually during his tenure.

Census figures rank New York sixth poorest among America’s 20 largest cities. Over two-thirds of New Yorkers can’t afford a home.

City homelessness is at record levels. It more than doubled since Bloomberg took office. It includes numbers sleeping in public shelters.

It excludes countless thousands on city streets. Many more rely on overcrowded substandard apartments. Others live with family or friends.

New York has a housing crisis. Rental prices are extremely high. Low cost alternatives are in short supply. Demand way exceeds what’s available.

What’s ongoing reflects New York’s unprecedented social polarization. It worsened steadily under Bloomberg.

New York’s top 20% most well off earn 40 times more than the bottom one-fifth. It’s top 1% earns infinitely more.

Bloomberg lied claiming “nobody’s sleeping on (New York City) streets.” Homelessness plagues New York. It’s at epidemic levels. It worsens annually. Little is done to address it.

Since 2008 crisis conditions erupted, Coalition for the Homeless figures show well over 100,000 men, women and children used city shelters.

Perhaps that many or more sleep on streets, rely on family, or make due best they can. Perhaps double or triple reported estimates. Main Street economic conditions are worse than ever.

City budget balancing harmed ordinary New Yorkers. Onerous tax burdens were imposed. Over $1 billion in public worker concessions were demanded.

Massive layoffs affected thousand of teachers, hundreds of firefighters and many other city workers. Dozens of senior centers and day care ones were closed.

Public wages were frozen or minimally increased. Benefits were cut. At the same time, Wall Street got generous ones on top of trillions of dollars of federal bailout funding.

Throughout his tenure, Bloomberg implemented numerous financial sector tax giveaways. He added billions to his own net worth.

Ordinary city residents got tax increases. Crisis conditions affect them. It’s increasing annually. Bloomberg largely ignored them.

He waged war on organized labor. He did so on public education. He supports making it another business profit center.

He wants young kids cheated. He wants them denied opportunities he had growing up. He closed dozens of city schools. Low-income neighborhoods were targeted.

He waged war on Occupy Wall Street. City cops were unleashed ruthlessly. Peaceful protesters were attacked. Beatings and arrests followed.

Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly intensified longstanding NYPD stop and frisk practices. Blacks and Latinos are targeted.

He denounced efforts to end flagrantly racist practices. He wants unconstitutional ones continued. He reflects the worst of irresponsible leadership.

Maybe Harvard will invite him to replace Faust as president when she steps down. Maybe he’ll accept.

Maybe he’ll run Harvard like NYC and Bloomberg LP. Maybe he’ll order it privatized and buy it.

Business as Usual: Israeli Hypocrisy

On Sunday, April 27, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared on U.S. television, denouncing progress made in reconciliation talks between Fatah, which ostensibly controls the West Bank, and Hamas, the democratically-elected government in the Gaza Strip.

According to CNN: “Netanyahu said he and Secretary of State John Kerry recently applauded that some progress was being made toward a peace agreement. ‘And then the next day, we were both shocked,  there’s no other word, we were absolutely stupefied that President Abbas embraced the terrorist organization Hamas that seeks Israel’s destruction,’ he said on ‘Face the Nation.’”

We will ignore for the moment the idea that the Prime Minister of Israel feels free to speak for the U.S. Secretary of State; when the puppet master pulls the strings, anything can happen.

 

Rather, we will focus on Mr. Netanyahu’s apparent horror and repugnance at the idea that the governing body of one nation, or part of a nation, seeks the destruction of another.

Israel plays lip service to the U.S.’s ineffectual and disingenuous attempts to achieve a two-state solution between Palestine and Israel, despite the fact that Israel continually, even during talks about said solution, destroys Palestinian homes, farms and villages, to create Israeli-only settlements. The borders of Palestine have shrunk to almost nothing since the establishment of the nation of Israel, which resulted from the violent eviction of over three quarters of a million Palestinians during the period of 1947 – 1948. Those genocidal practices have continued now for nearly seven decades.

Mr. Netanyahu refuses to deal with anyone who wishes the destruction of Israel, yet he is actively pursuing the complete annihilation of Palestine. This murderous pursuit, in violation of numerous international laws, is financed almost fully by the United States.

A comparison of financial aid to Palestine and Israel by the U.S. shows the complete dishonesty of the latter two countries.

Since the mid-1990s, according to the Congressional Research Report, ‘U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians’, dated September 30, 2013, the U.S. has committed (note: the report does not say ‘sent’) $5 billion dollars to Palestine. That, of course, sounds like a great deal of money, but that sum must be put into context. Since 1987, the U.S. has sent over $3 billion dollars to Israel, every year. So if we assume that ‘the mid-1990s’ means 1995, Palestine was scheduled to receive an average of $158 million each year, or about $433,000 a day. Israel, receiving $3 billion a year, averages about $9 million a day, most of it in military aid. During fiscal year 2013, while the U.S. was busy giving Israel its nearly $9 million dollars a day in military aid, the sum given to Palestine for military aid was $0.

As a result of this generous largess by the U.S., Israel has the most sophisticated weapons of offense and defense that exist in the world today. Palestinians, on the other hand, are occasionally able to cobble together sufficient supplies to make a few bottle rockets.

At least partly because of this unspeakable inequality by the U.S, since 2000, 1,109 Israelis have been killed in conflicts with Palestinians, yet 6,862 Palestinians have been killed. Among the population of children, 129 Israeli children have died, and at least 1,523 Palestinian children have been killed by Israel. In that time period, 8550 Israelis have been injured. This is compared to 54,761 Palestinians injured in that same time. Palestine currently detains no Israelis, yet 5,224 Palestinians are incarcerated in Israeli prisons. Going back further, since 1967, at least 27,000 Palestinian homes have been destroyed by Israel. No Israeli homes have been destroyed by Palestine.

So Mr. Netanyahu’s ‘shock’ that Fatah and Hamas are in reconciliation talks, and that he can’t possibly deal with an organization that seeks Israel’s destruction, is a bit difficult to swallow. But this is typical for the Israeli Prime Minister and, by extension, the U.S. Both countries talk about negotiations with Palestine, when Israel, with the U.S.’s blessing, can take whatever it wants from Palestine with impunity. They discuss the need for Palestine to respect the sovereignty of Israel’s borders, but are content to allow Israel to violate Palestine’s borders on a constant basis. They decry the occasional bottle rocket launched from the Gaza Strip that reaches Israel, but then allow and support the carpet-bombing of Gaza. They condemn any resistance by the occupied against the occupier, but perpetrate horrific acts of terrorism by Israel against the Palestinians.

And now, to ‘reward’ Palestine for attempting to reconcile its government, the U.S. is threatening to cut off the paltry sum it currently sends that beleaguered nation. So the annual aid, now proposed at $400 million (although Israel’s displeasure with anything Palestine does is sufficient to cause all or part of that to be withheld), what Israel receives from the U.S. in about 50 days, is now in jeopardy. In order to prevent this loss, a unified Palestinian government must renounce violence and recognize Israel.

Where, one might ask, is the demand that Israel renounce violence and recognize Palestine? Where is the threat that any part of the billions of dollars the U.S. sends Israel every year will be withheld until that nation does so? Why, one asks, is ineffectual resistance to brutal occupation considered terrorism, yet the occupation itself, which takes a horrific toll on all Palestinians on a daily basis, considered acceptable?

It has long been known that the U.S. government, the so-called elected representatives of the people, has been bought by the American Israel Political Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Can there be any other reason that unspeakable human rights abuses are not only allowed, but actually funded, by the U.S. government? In the U.S., government officials pay homage to the lobbyists, and the lobbyists with the deepest pockets get the most reverence. And few of the U.S.’s representatives will bite the hand that so generously feeds them.

There are only two things that can ease the burdens of the Palestinians, and give them hope for an independent nation of their own. The first is the recognition by the global community of Israel’s apartheid practices, and the resolution to do something to end them. The second is a lobby group in the U.S. that is larger and more powerful than AIPAC to come into existence. This does not appear to be on the horizon. The former option appears to be making progress, however; the BDS (Boycott, Divest and Sanction) movement is ever-growing and is gaining international support. Palestine has a greater presence in the United Nations than ever before, and is recognized by 132 U.N. members, about 68% of that world body (Israel is recognized by 160 countries, about 83%), and that number is slowly growing. Mr. Netanyahu may not like it, and may deny it, but world opinion is moving away from him and Israel and their lies. And that can’t happen soon enough for Palestine.

Drugs, Popular Kulture & Mind Control

leary13.jpg

( His mantra was, “Turn on, tune in, drop out.” Was Tim Leary a CIA agent?) 

With Illuminati banker George Soros
now promoting the legalization of pot, 
we look back at how the CIA used drugs
to sedate the baby boomer generation.

In an Illuminati (i.e. Communist) state such as the US, there is no real culture, only social engineering.

When I met Timothy Leary in 1990, I was disillusioned. I had contacted him through his publisher and he phoned me. I went to LA especially to see him. He was my guru. I wanted to know if the utopian vision he represented was still alive.

Unfortunately, Leary was fixated on the benefits of what was then called the “information superhighway.”  Pioneer of LSD, his pantry table was crammed with bottles of alcohol.

He told me his “vision of God” was depicted in the last scene in William Gibson’s book “Neuromancer.” 

“At the end of the world, all the information stored in all the computers will rise up into Cyberspace and mingle together.” he said. “That’s God.”

Wonderful, I thought. All those airline reservations, all that trivia and human detritus mingling together. At the time I had no inkling that Cabalists believed that perception is reality, and that man creates God, i.e. man is God.  

Over lunch, I tried to remind Leary of his original vision: using drugs to awaken our spiritual potential and become more God-like in behavior.

“What do you think God is?” he scoffed. “An old man with a beard?”

A disconnect had taken place. The old Leary represented a genuine spiritual awakening. The new Leary was all about mindless human meandering and drivel being equated with the Divine.

CIA AGENT?

Had Leary been working for the CIA when he preached the mantra “Turn on, tune in drop out?”

Writer Mark Reibling put this question to the aged guru in 1994 after a speech in Gainesville Florida.

“They never gave me a dime,” Leary replied with a pained expression, and then avoided his questioner.

Reibling believes Leary was a CIA agent and informer. The CIA promotes people who believe in a cause but are unaware they are advancing the Illuminati agenda.  Funds and drugs for Leary’s research came from the CIA.

In his autobiography, “Flashbacks” (1983), Leary credits Cord Meyer, the CIA executive in charge of funding the counter culture with “helping me to understand my political cultural role more clearly.” In the book “Mass Control” by Jim Keith, Leary admits to being a “witting accomplice” of the CIA.

Elsewhere he says the “Liberal CIA” is the “best mafia you can deal with in the Twentieth Century.”  Leary clearly was working for the CIA but was also doing what he wanted-turning on.

According to Reibling, Mary Pinchot Meyer, (Cord Meyer’s ex-wife and JFK’s mistress) told Leary, “the CIA creates the radical journals and student organizations and runs them with deep-cover agents…. dissident organizations in academia are also controlled.”

She confides that CIA has not only been running left-wing groups as fronts, but has been sponsoring more psychedelic research than he will ever know.

“You are doing exploratory work the CIA tried to do in the 1950s. So they’re more than happy to have you do their research for them. Since drug research is of vital importance to the intelligence agencies of this country, you’ll be allowed to go on with your experiments as long as you keep it quiet,” she said.

POP CULTURE CONTRIVED TO CONTROL


After working for Civil Rights in the 1960’s, I joined the rising crescendo of anti-war activity when the CIA-controlled mass media gave the signal.

In 1968, three vents deflated the anti-war movement: 1) the gut-wrenching assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy; 2) LBJ’s decision not to seek reelection (his CFR handlers told him to go) and 3) the clubbing of protesters at the Democratic Convention in Chicago.

Acting with uncanny unison, (for “non-conformists”) my generation gave up on “social change,” became “alienated” and “turned inward.”

We needed to change ourselves before we can change the world. Thanks to the CIA, Leary’s mantra was heard in the mass media and drugs were plentiful.

Although it was another ten years before I tried marijuana, I experienced the “Summer of Love” hitchhiking across Canada in 1967. Maybe it was time to “hang loose” and focus on personal things. The 1970’s became the “Me Decade.”

MIND EXPANDING DRUGS 

Although I have not taken LSD, I embraced the utopian vision of Timothy Leary and Aldous Huxley. They believed that “mind expanding” drugs could provide a genuine visionary experience and release mankind’s spiritual potential. In experiments, theology students had life changing revelations; alcoholics were cured. For millennia, many cultures have used drugs to promote spirituality.

In Mexico, Leary took magic mushrooms. The experience convinced him the normal mind was “a static repetitive circuit.”

“It was above all and without question the deepest religious experience of my life.  I discovered that beauty, revelation, sensuality, the cellular history of the past, God, the devil, all lie inside my body, outside my mind.”

This LSD-fueled vision of utopia was put into practice at the highest levels of the US government. In 1963, Cord Meyer’s estranged wife Mary Pinchot Meyers was having an affair with President John F. Kennedy who had embraced LSD. Mary approached Leary for supplies and advice. She and her friends were turning on “some of the most powerful men in Washington.”

In Dec. 1963, Meyer called Leary and said they killed JFK because “they couldn’t control him anymore. He was changing too fast. They’ve covered everything up. I’m afraid. Be careful.” In Oct. 1964, she was murdered by the CIA.

 CONCLUSION

In the 1950’s, the CIA experimented with marijuana and LSD as “truth drugs.”

A decade later, in the 1960’s, they used them to divert idealistic Americans from the path of social responsibility to one of introspection and self-gratification, i.e. “spiritual liberation.” They neutralized my generation by turning social activists into “flower children” advocating “peace and love.”

We are marionettes. The environment, fe-manism, diversity, you name it. The bankers are pulling our strings. In the case of the drug culture, they made us self absorbed and quiescent. They didn’t expect many of us to find God.

I still believe that marijuana and LSD can awaken our spiritual dimension. They are truth drugs. I am confident that the widespread use of marihuana will backfire on the Illuminati and expose them for what they really are, control freaks, psychotics and megalomaniacs.

Gone Gaga

Lady-Gaga-YouCantReadMyPokerFace-1920x1200-Wallpaper

Gone, Gone MAD! Yep, the wicked world has gone mad. The worlds gone gaga. When you read something like this then you know it’s true!
“I have this recurring dream sometimes where there’s a phantom in my home and he takes me into a room, and there’s a blond girl with ropes tied to all four of her limbs. And she’s got my shoes on from the Grammys. Go figure—pyscho. And the ropes are pulling her apart.”

1326973308_black-black-and-white-edit-gaga-lady-gaga-favim.com-237388

But it gets even stranger. “I never see her get pulled apart, but I just watch her whimper, and then the phantom says to me, ‘If you want me to stop hurting her and if you want your family to be OK, you will cut your wrist.’ And I think that he has his own, like, crazy wrist-cutting device. And he has this honey in, like, Tupperware, and it looks like sweet-and-sour sauce with a lot of MSG from New York. Just bizarre. And he wants me to pour the honey into the wound, and then put cream over it and a gauze.”
Gaga was confused by her dream and turned to other sources to find out its meaning. “So I looked up the dream, and I couldn’t find anything about it anywhere. And my mother goes, ‘Isn’t that an illuminati ritual?’ And I was like, ‘Oh, my God!’”

 

leadromance

This is a perfect example of a demonic dream. Demons have the ability to enter your dream and infuse messages into your conscious. This could even be a warning of an attachment within your body). She acknowledges she spoke to a demon! She even is told by her Mother that it’s a ritual. I think these are clues that she knows the performances she enacts are willing rituals.
Monarch Programming is a technique used to create mind controlled slaves. This horrid process creates an alter personality which is easier to control. It is basically a process of torturing the victim until they lose touch with reality, and an alter-personality is born. This in my opinion is when a demon enters the mind too.

Insane Gagas

It is named after the monarch butterfly, because of the metamorphosis that takes place; at first it is a cocoon, and then it turns into a butterfly. Same results are shown after the programming is finished, a new person is born. The process includes SRA and MPD, (Satanic Ritual Abuse and Multiple Personality Disorder).
Once a split in the core personality occurs, an “internal world” can be created and alters can be programmed using tools such as music, movies, and fairy tales. These visual and audio aids enhance the programming process using images, symbols, meanings and concepts.

lady_gaga

A monarch controlled person is referred to as a victim because of the extreme mental, physical and sexual abuse they endure. Victims are constantly manipulated by their handlers, in this love-terror environment, monarch slaves are easier to trigger.

M_Id_436483_Lady_Gaga

The handlers cause intense trauma to subjects through the use of electroshock. A frame of this device measuring the voltage is shown for a split second in the video. In the first moments of the music video, you can also hear the shocks.
Strapping, bondage, and restraints are part of the process also. It is especially applied in the creating of BETA alters. This level of monarch programming, has the highest frequency of EEG brain waves, meaning the person is alert. These alters, are programmed to be sex slaves without any moral convictions. These alters are called “cat alters”.

lady-gaga-born-this-way

The trauma is not only used to create alters, but also for something very important.” much of the time to know how their system of alters is in use. The shield of secrecy allows cult members to live and work around other people and remain totally undetected. The front alters can be wonderful Christians, and the deeper alters can be the worst type of Satanic monster imaginable–a Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde effect.”

teaching

Which brings us to the last part of our analysis. Several alters can be created via this process, some known to the public, and some hidden. In this video, we see 5 -if not more.
The alters can look the same as the core persona, but most of the time there are slight differences, and here we can see big differences. What stays the same is that, like people who suffer naturally from MPD, the alters go by different names.

judas15

I can’t help but remembering the Dostoyevsky prophecy: If man forgets Hell, Hell will find his way to man.

ladygaga-costumes
Is she living in hell or does she know she’s part of this project? Sadly, I believe she’s fully aware and proud of her accomplishments. Now, considering her Mother has mentioned the “Illuminati”, my question to her Mother is, do you know what part she plays in this agenda?

leadguy3

Was Surveillance the Purpose of the Internet?

all-seeing-eye.jpg

 

 

left, the all seeing eye 

David Livingstone implies that all-pervasive
surveillance was the intention, and not an
accidental byproduct of the invention of
the personal computer & Internet.

 

The personal computer was largely a product of the “computer liberation” movement that grew out of the counter-culture of California in the 1960s.

More specifically, those trends were in turn an outgrowth of the CIA’s MK-Ultra program that popularized drug use for “mind-expanding” purposes.

brand.jpg(Stewart Brand, now 75) 

A leading representative of this trend, who coined the term “personal computer,” was Stewart Brand, MK-Ultra agent and founder of the influential Whole Earth Catalogue.

By the mid-1960s, Brand was associated with key MK-Ultra agent, author Ken Kesey and his “Merry Pranksters.” In San Francisco, Brand produced the Trips Festival, involving rock music and light shows. This was one of the first venues at which the Grateful Dead performed in San Francisco. Brand is described in the beginning of Tom Wolfe’s 1968 book, The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test.

Brand was deeply influenced by cybernetics visionary Norbert Wiener, electronics media theorist Marshall McLuhan, and architect and designer Buckminster Fuller.

Jeffrey Steinberg in From Cybernetics to Littleton: Techniques of Mind Control, reports that, their goal “was the development of computers, and the prospect of combining high-speed computers with so-called Artificial Intelligence, to literally ‘program’ the human race.”

Underlying all of their efforts was the absurd belief that the human mind was a machine, and a Tower of Babel-like conviction that its functioning could be replicated, and eventually surpassed, by computers.

In 1974, Stewart Brand an essay announcing, “Ready or not, computers are coming to the people.”

Brand created the Whole Earth Catalogue, published between 1968 and 1971, which identified and promoted key products or tools for communal living and to help “transform the individual into a capable, creative person.” According to Steve Jobs, founder of Apple Computers, the catalogue was “one the bibles of my generation.”

reingold.jpgAlso working with Brand was Howard Rheingold, who was as founding executive editor of HotWired, one of the first commercial content web sites published in 1994 by Wired magazine. A lifelong fascination with mind augmentation and its methods led Rheingold to the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) and Xerox PARC.

PARC is a research and development company in Palo Alto, with a distinguished reputation for its significant contributions to the modern personal computer, including graphical user interface (GUI), featuring windows and icons and operated with a mouse. The evolving mythos is that Steve Jobs was granted access to view PARC’s developments, and was able to turn them into marketable products by integrating them into the Macintosh computer.

PARC hired many employees of the nearby Augmentation Research Center of the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) as that facility’s funding from DARPA, NASA, and the US Air Force began to diminish. Originally founded as a means of attracting commercial business research at Stanford University in California, SRI began taking on military and intelligence contracts, many of them classified.

In May 1974, SRI led a study on how to transform the US into Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, entitled “Changing Images of Man.” The report stressed the importance of the United States in promoting Masonic ideals, effectively creating the ideal Masonic state.

harman.jpgLeading the study was Willis Harman,(1918-1997)  left, a former consultant to the White House and who had been involved in LSD research on behalf of the CIA.

In 1976, Harman wrote An Incomplete Guide to the Future in which he advocated a society based on the ideals of Freemasonry. Harman believed that the symbol of the pyramid with the floating capstone on the Great Seal “indicates that the nation will flourish only as its leaders are guided by supraconscious intuition,” which he defined as “divine insight.”

Willis Harman disciple Marilyn Ferguson in her best-selling The Aquarian Conspiracy (1980), depicted the New Age counterculture as the realization of H. G. Wells’ The Open Conspiracy, tried to popularize it by painting the drive to foster New Age doctrines as a spontaneous and positive development.

Ferguson conducted a survey of 185 leaders of the Human Potential and New Age Movement and found that the most influential thinkers mentioned were the French philosopher, Jesuit priest and Julian Huxley associate, Teilhard de Chardin, of the Piltdown Man hoax, followed by Carl Jung who worked closely with CIA head Allen Dulles, and Aldous Huxley, who was the guiding figure of its MK-Ultra program.

huxley.jpgAldous’ brother Julian wrote the introduction to de Chardin’s book, The Phenomenon of Man. Aldous and Julian were the grandsons of Thomas H. Huxley, who was also a founder of the infamous Round Table, which was responsible for creating the Council on Foreign Relations.

Thomas H. Huxley was also known as “Darwin’s Bulldog,” for his defense of evolutionary theory, which according to Rabbi Kook (1865 – 1935), most important exponent of Religious Zionism, “is increasingly conquering the world at this time, and, more so than all other philosophical theories, conforms to the Kabbalistic secrets of the world.” According to Julian Huxley: “evolution is nothing but matter become conscious of itself.”

Interest in Darwinism was related to the Theosophical notion of spiritual evolution. Based on the Kabbalah, it asserted that nature as well as human consciousness evolves, forming the basis of the belief in an expected cultural transformation that would come to characterize much twentieth-century occult and eventually New Age thought.

chardin.jpg(Teilhard de Chardin is often regarded as the patron saint of the Internet.) 
Often referred to as the “Catholic Darwin,” Teilhard de Chardin laid the ground for aspirations of creating artificial intelligence by arguing that as mankind organizes itself in more complex social networks, the Noosphere will grow in awareness, culminating in the goal of history, which he referred to as the Omega Point, a maximum level of complexity and consciousness towards which he believed the universe was evolving.

Teilhard called on humanity to create a “sphere of mutually reinforced consciousness, the seat, support and instrument of super-vision and super-ideas.”

In other words, mankind was to build the Noosphere. Effectively, man will create God, the all-seeing eye featuring on the back of the dollar bill, floating above the pyramid of human society, whose omniscience and wisdom will be derived from mining the accumulated data from recording every facet of human activity.

More Kerry Bullying, Bluster and Big Lies

He’s no diplomat. He’s a world class thug. He mocks legitimacy. He disgraces the office he holds. He represents the worst of America’s dark side.

Ukraine

He’s a serial liar. He’s been caught red-handed lying numerous times before. He’s at it again.

Big Lies infested his Monday Wall Street Journal interview. Truth was nowhere in sight. More on what he said below.

On April 28, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the following:

“Today, in response to Russia’s continued actions in southern and eastern Ukraine, the United States is implementing additional restrictive measures on defense exports to Russia.”

“Accordingly, the Department of State is expanding its export restrictions on technologies and services regulated under the US Munitions List (USML).”

“Effective immediately, the Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) will deny pending applications for export or re-export of any high technology defense articles or services regulated under the US.”

“Munitions List to Russia or occupied Crimea that contribute to Russia’s military capabilities. In addition, the Department is taking actions to revoke any existing export licenses which meet these conditions.”

“All other pending applications and existing licenses will receive a case-by-case evaluation to determine their contribution to Russia’s military capabilities.”

“The United States will continue to adjust its export licensing policies toward Russia, as warranted by Russia’s actions in Ukraine.”

“We urge Russia to honor the commitments it made in Geneva on April 17 to deescalate the situation in Ukraine.”

Fact: Washington bears full responsibility for Ukrainian crisis conditions.

Fact: Russia prioritizes resolving them responsibly.

Fact: It’s gone all-out to do so.

Fact: Moscow fully honors its Geneva commitments.

Fact: Washington violated them straightaway.

Fact: Sanctions are illegitimate.

Fact: They have no legal standing.

Fact: Imposing them is entirely political.

Fact: Washington wants Russia marginalized, isolated and weakened.

Fact: It wants its sovereign independence destroyed.

Fact: It wants it transformed into a pro-Western vassal state.

Fact: It wants its resources plundered.

Fact: It wants its people exploited.

Fact: It wants all independent countries eliminated.

Fact : It wants unchallenged global dominance.

Fact: It threatens world peace.

Fact: It wages wars to achieve ends.

Fact: Humanity’s fate hangs in the balance.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov called US sanctions “revolting.” They’re “distorted and groundless,” he said. Kremlin officials are “disgusted.”

“We will respond although it is not our choice,” he added. “(W)e can’t leave this situation without reaction, without practical reaction, without by means of our own decisions.”

“US behavior in the field is becoming provocative.”

Kerry lied responding to Wall Street Journal questions. “You almost feel that (Putin is) “creating his own reality, and his own sort of world, divorced from a lot of what’s real on the ground for all those people, including people in his own country.”

“We’re inches away from” targeting whole sectors of Russia’s economy. “And if they continue on this path, that’s where it’s heading.”

He unjustifiably blames Putin for US crimes. Ukrainian crisis conditions are “obviously very personally driven in ways that I think are uniquely inappropriate to 21st century leadership,” he said.

“It’s an amazing display of a kind of personal reaction to something that just doesn’t fit into the lessons learned for the last 60 years or 70 years.”

“It’s so divorced that it leaves you feeling badly for the consequences. I think the Russian people are going to pay a price for this.”

“It’s unfortunate for the Russian people, who clearly don’t fit into the costs that are being attached to this, because it appears to be so personal to President Putin.”

Putin’s appeal to ‘nationalism’ is “dangerous in this time and place.”

“There’s no question that plans were executed in a thoughtful way in Crime. Obviously there’s a plan. And it’s being carried out with a sort of singular resolve, I guess is the way to put it.”

He called Putin’s failure to bend to Washington’s will “an example of bad faith and absence of legitimacy.”

“You’re supposed to try to find a diplomatic solution to things. If you can’t do that then you have to take the steps necessary to enforce your policy.”

He thinks things “could deteriorate into hot confrontation” even without Russian troops entering Ukraine.

“And there are provocateurs who are perfectly capable, who are trying to instigate that kind of flare-up.”

He praised Kiev restraint from preventing it, he said. “But obviously you could have a flash point here.”

Fact: Blaming Putin for US crimes doesn’t wash.

Fact: Sanctions cut both ways.

Fact: Russia can punish America’s economy effectively.

Fact: Trading bilaterally in rubles with other countries using their own currencies works best.

Fact: Doing so weakens dollar strength.

Fact: Dollar supremacy is at stake.

Fact: Its reserve currency status could end.

Fact: So could its ability to continue imperial adventurism.

Fact: Putin respects national sovereignty.

Fact: He observes rule of law principles.

Fact: He’s not revanchist.

Fact: He has no imperial ambitions.

Fact: His so-called appeal to nationalism doesn’t exist.

Fact: His good faith highlights his legitimacy.

Fact: Washington’s bad faith reveals its dark side.

Fact: Crimeans acted solely on their own volition.

Fact: No Russian involvement encouraged them.

Fact: Diplomacy isn’t Washington’s long suit.

Fact: It bullies nations into compliance.

Fact: It threatens them.

Fact: It cows them into submission.

Fact: Ukraine is a major global flashpoint.

Fact: Kiev putschists have no legitimacy.

Fact: They violated Geneva four-party agreement terms straightaway.

Fact: They instigated violence.

Fact: They escalated it.

Fact: They continue it.

Fact: They deployed neo-Nazi Right Sector thugs to do so.

Fact: They hired foreign mercenaries to supplement them.

Fact: Expect things heading from bad to worse.

Fact: Expect possible civil war.

Fact: Expect potential East/West confrontation.

Fact: Washington’s drive for hegemony risks WW III.

On April 29, Russia’s Foreign Ministry accused EU nations of escalating Ukrainian crisis conditions, saying:

“If someone in Brussels hopes to stabilize the situation in Ukraine (through sanctions), it is an evident sign of their complete incomprehension of the domestic political situation in this country and a direct invitation for local neo-Nazis to continue anarchy and outrages regarding the civilians of the southeast.”

“Instead of forcing the Kiev clique to sit at the table with southeastern Ukraine to negotiate the future structure of the country, our partners are doing Washington’s bidding with new unfriendly gestures aimed at Russia.”

At the same time, brutal clashes erupted in Donetsk. Pro and anti-Kiev forces clashed.

Right Sector thugs initiated things. They attacked peaceful protesters. Police were unable to contain things.

Over a dozen injuries were reported. At least eight people were hospitalized.

According to journalist Vitaly Ivanov, around 1,000 “neo-Nazi thugs” were involved. “We were expecting an attack,” he said.

“We had objective information. Really, the guys arrived with baseball bats, sticks and rods.”

About 200 anti-Kiev activists “met them halfway in order to regain the initiative.”

“More and more people joined us at an incredible pace as we made our way.”

“When we reached (pro-Kiev thugs), there were about 1,000 of us…We were received with aggression.”

“Smoke grenades were thrown at us. Several people got injured.”

“Then there were a couple of small scuffles with the ultras. And then they just dispersed.”

“They didn’t expect such a rebuff; that there'(d) be so many of us.” Molotov cocktails and stones were thrown.

Activists shouted “Crimea! Donbass! Russia!”

“Fascism won’t take hold.”

“Say no to Nazism.”

Activists sang songs in Russian. On Sunday, Right Sector thugs attacked Kharkov anti-Kiev elements.

Expect more incidents like these to follow. Perhaps throughout Southeastern Ukraine. Perhaps more deadly ones.

The neocon controlled Washington Post blamed peaceful Donetsk activists for neo-Nazi Right Sector violence. It called them “club-and whip-wielding separatists…”

It said they’re “shadowy forces that make their view known, but rarely their identities.”

It lied saying they attacked pro-Kiev supporters “(w)ith Ukrainian flags flying high and garlands of flowers in their hair.”

They “ambushed” them. They “clubbed” them. They “swung whips.” They “hurled Molotov cocktails.”

It called what happened “the latest proof of disarray” engulfing Eastern Ukraine.

Chicago Tribune editors accused Putin of “grandiose plans to expand the Russian empire.” No empire exists.

Putin isn’t revanchist. Tribune editors lied claiming otherwise. “The Russian ‘strongman’ is wildly popular at home after his Crimea adventure,” they added.

“(T)he Russian bear may prove to be…an economic paper tiger.”

“Putin talks about asserting Russian dominance over the entire region.”

You can’t make this stuff up. Other lies followed. US media scoundrels proliferate them. Truth is whitewashed. It doesn’t have a chance.

At risk is world peace. Ukraine is ground zero for potential East/West confrontation. All bets are off if it happens.

Obama’s Secret Pipeline

Isn’t it odd that an 800-mile pipeline that runs across environmentally sensitive land has been permitted without any mention in the media? Not a word about it from President Obama either. Obama’s Secret Pipeline Obama’s Secret Pipeline will be built over land that’s much more sensitive than that of the Keystone XL pipeline, which gets nothing but front-page coverage. It will actually be 17% (six inches) larger in diameter than Keystone XL (36 inches) and it will transport natural gas, not oil. Bill 138 The Senate of Alaska, the state in which the pipeline will be built, has just passed Bill 138, which makes the state a partner of three of the world’s largest oil companies, including one that has a horrible environmental track record on US soil. In a nutshell, Alaska’s government is now partners with BP, ExxonMobil, and ConocoPhillips. Only one more signature is required—Governor Sean Parnell’s—and it’s expected that he will sign the deal. Not Even the US Government Wants US Dollars For more than 100 years, the US government has been receiving a royalty and tax revenue paid on the amount of oil or natural gas produced on American soil—a fee that is paid in US dollars. Bill 138 has changed this forever. Instead of Alaska receiving its dues in US dollars, the state legislature has decreed through Bill 138 that the state will be paid “in kind.” In other words, the state will be getting its share of royalty and tax revenue in natural gas instead of US dollars. For the record, this is the first time ever that a US state has entered into a partnership like this. Essentially, Alaska is now a 25% equity partner with BP, ExxonMobil, and ConocoPhillips—which also requires the state to cough up cold, hard cash to build the entire project, including the 800-mile-long, 42-inch-wide pipeline. Overall, the project is currently estimated to cost north of US$50 billion, and we expect that when all the capital expense overruns and government inefficiencies are accounted for, the whole project will come in at more than US$75 billion, using the total costs of similar projects for comparison. But it will be 2015 before the final negotiations and the specific details of the partnership are agreed on, and remember, the devil is in the details. Who do you think will get the better end of the deal—a bunch of government bureaucrats with zero oil and gas experience, or the world’s top oil- and gas-producing companies? I know whom I’m betting on. Which leads us to the point of this weekly missive. And the Winner of Obama’s Secret Pipeline Is… We already know which company will be building and operating Obama’s Secret Pipeline. The company I’m talking about has a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and a better yield than all of its peers. That’s good, because shareholders get paid a monthly yield for owning the stock while sitting back and watching the share price rise as well. The Ultimate Oil Toll Booth Think of it this way: this company charges the world’s most powerful oil and gas producers for every barrel of oil that passes through its “road network,” and now it can also charge the state of Alaska. Regardless of the price of oil or natural gas, this company gets its fee. It’s a low-risk way to benefit from a high-risk enterprise. This company is a current Buy in our Casey Energy Dividends portfolio. The Energy team is currently working hard on the upcoming issue, which will in detail cover the company that’s bound to gain big from Obama’s Secret Pipeline. I know you haven’t heard about this pipeline yet, but you will soon enough. That’s what we do here at the Energy Division of Casey Research: We’re the first to uncover breakthrough stories, and the first to uncover the best energy investment opportunities in the world. Doug Casey and I just got back from a whirlwind European tour, where we visited many of Europe’s most promising energy projects. Here’s a picture of Doug Casey and me at Europe’s largest onshore drill site. This drill rig is 15 stories high and uses about 16,000 liters of diesel a day to turn the drills—which Doug and I are holding in this picture. As a side note, just the crank shaft that we’re holding costs US$2 million—this rig is expensive and gigantic. For you to get a better perspective on the true size of Europe’s largest onshore drill rig, here is a picture of Doug Casey and me with our friends Frank Holmes, Frank Giustra, and Matt Smith. (From far left to right: Frank Holmes, Doug Casey, Marin Katusa, Frank Giustra, Matt Smith) Do Your Portfolio a Favor and Try Out the Casey Energy Report Doug Casey and I have done all the hard work for you. The current issue of the Casey Energy Report is a compilation of our Europe trip, including in-depth descriptions of our site visits and a new recommendation with a hugely promising project in an out-of-the-way European country that we personally checked out. The company is backed by mining giant Frank Giustra, and you bet he knows what he’s doing. The Casey Energy Report comes with a free one-year subscription to Casey Energy Dividends (a $79 value), including, of course, the upcoming May issue with our “Obama’s Secret Pipeline” pick. There’s no risk in trying it: You have 90 days to find out if it’s right for you—love it or cancel for a full refund. You don’t have to travel 300+ days a year (as we do) to discover the best energy investments in the world—we do it for you. If you don’t like the Casey Energy Report or don’t make any money within your first three months, just cancel within that time for a full, prompt refund. Even if you miss the cutoff, you can cancel anytime for a prorated refund on the unused part of your subscription.

Disney’s ‘Frozen’ conspiracy theories

I watched Disney’s insanely popular Frozen (now the highest grossing animated film of all time) and tried to really focus on this theory that the film is some kind of Disney subliminal brainwash to make kids homosexual. I’ve got to say that I think it’s silly and unfounded. Don’t get me wrong, Disney is no saint, and I’ve got plenty of Disney conspiracy theories and symbolism on this website to prove it, but as far as Frozen turning kids gay; I highly doubt it. I know this sounds absurd coming from the same guy that drones on about shape shifting reptilians and All Seeing Eyes in music videos, but I’ll try to explain myself here.

*Spoilers*

If you’re new to this idea that Frozen is a pro-homosexual agenda film (and you’re probably not), it apparently blew up from the Mormon blogger Kathryn Skaggs at WellBehavedMormonWoman who posted about it back in February after watching the film a few times (although the idea was already online at other websites like National Catholic Register). I read through her post, which is pretty exasperating because she doesn’t narrow down her support for this theory too precisely, and I really only found one or two pieces of evidence that might be considered. Those would be the song Let It Go and the storyline involving opening and closing of gates. We’ll get to both of these in the final section of this post where I go into my conspiracy theory nonsense about the film.

And just to talk a little shit, she says typical right-wing stuff like:

“Remember, that in today’s liberal society allowing almost anything, even legalizing it, in the name of “love” trumps sin- it’s that powerful of an ideology”.

To pluck out one tiny thing from the Old Testament (homosexuality) and claim that love wouldn’t trump it sounds ignorant as hell. I’m pretty sure ‘judgment’ was on the list of things ‘not-to-do’ as well, so take it easy. Letting homosexuals hold one another’s hands while one is sick and/or dying in a hospital room seems like a reasonable, rational, and loving thing to do; call me crazy. If you’re worried that your church will start marrying homosexuals under some kind of forced regulation than you’re more paranoid than I am.

Skaggs’ opinion seems to be echoed by other right-wingers like radio host Pastor Kevin Swanson who claimed that Elsa’s magical powers are the metaphor for homosexuality. The support for this is the fact that Elsa is hidden from her public and family in the ice tower; akin to how homosexuals are demonized. Skaggs supports this theory by claiming that:

“Shame is at the core of Elsa’s feelings about her magical powers: same-sex attraction”

While this is sort of a reasonable idea, I find this to be counter intuitive to the argument, because the claim that anyone would choose to be homosexual is ridiculous and this is one of the reasons why it’s ridiculous. The idea that Elsa stays in this miserable and lonely existence in the tower, separated from the ones she loves actually supports the argument that homosexuality would never be a choice because who would choose to go through all of the things that go along with taking that path if they truly had a choice of being straight or homosexual? Being a functioning human in today’s society is difficult enough, I can’t imagine how much more difficult you’d make it on yourself if you ‘chose’ to be homosexual. Not to mention that I can’t think of anything more problematic than forcing yourself to be sexually attracted to someone that you’re not, even if you’ve been indoctrinated by Disney to think that. And then on top of all of that, there’s not one example of Elsa or Anna showing love for another woman in the film (unless you want to count the sisterly love which saves Anna).

And to go into it a bit more, the woman who blogged about it comes from a Mormon background apparently, and that faith hasn’t really been to progressive in the treatment of gay people. From an article about Mormon Gay Cures on ABC:

Twice a week for six months, he jolted himself with painful shocks to the penis to rid himself of his attraction to men.

“I kept trying to fight it, praying and fasting and abstaining and being the best person I could,” said Cameron, now a 59-year-old playwright and head of the acting program at the University of Iowa.

“I was never actively gay, never had any encounters with men — never had moments when I failed and actually had sex with other men,” he said.

But his undercurrent of feelings put him in direct conflict with the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-day Saints (LDS) and its principles.

“As teens we were taught that homosexuality was second only to murder in the eyes of God,” he said.

Kind of weird and creepy if you ask me. But to each his own, I’m not knocking on any faiths but I’ll definitely knock on unequal treatment.

So anyhow, here’s my conspiracy theory on the film, which kind of supports what the others are saying, but not in such a homophobic way:

First off, notice that Disney killed the parents off right away. This is typical in trauma based mind control and you see it in practically every Disney movie. I can see that the destruction of the typical nuclear family is one of the Disney agendas, as they’ve done it many times in the past with one or both parents getting wacked right from the jump (although it’s a leap to say that homosexuality is the next step).

IlluminatiWatcherDotCom Frozen Illuminati Trauma

The reason they do it is for the warrior/princess programming. They want the girls to chase a life of whimsical fantasy and being taken care of by some hunky prince with lots of money (‘I ain’t saying she’s a gold-digger’), while simultaneously somehow being useless besides being a trophy wife. Similarly, the boys must grow up to protect the princess and be a warrior fighting to the death, a theory that I heard from Freeman Fly who alludes to the support of the military industrial complex machine through Disney (who once let the military run shop out of his studios, and also produced military propaganda films for). Of course, in this film the male figure doesn’t necessarily ‘save the day’ so to speak, and in fact one of the other theories out there is that it is pushing a pro-feminine angle because the women are the heroes here. Either way, the film shows the “uselessness” of a full family unit when the daughters overcome all adversity. The killing off of the parents is just one of the strange things we typically see in a Disney film, and this one is no exception.

The next thing I’d like to introduce is the very overt and obvious casting of magic spells in the film. Of course this makes it a children’s film and I can’t blame them because you’re not going to get children to sit still and watch a documentary by any means, but still; it’s magic.

IlluminatiWatcherDotCom Frozen Illuminati magic

All of Disney is about magic and the basis for this is occult in nature, take the upcoming Maleficent film (from my post about the Illuminati symbolism behind the film):

 The queen from the original Sun, Moon, and Talia tale will be explored through a portrayal by Angelina Jolie in the 2014 film Maleficent. Maleficent is a demonic fairy from the Disney fairy tale Sleeping Beauty, who lives up to her title which means “to do harm or evil.” She teleports supernaturally while King Stefan’s daughter, Aurora (played by Elle Fanning) is christened and curses her to die on her 16th birthday. The name Aurora means “dawn” and theorists believe it is important to the occult with the symbolism behind the Aurora, Colorado Batman shootings. The dawn is symbolic of the original tale in that we see more worship of the sun and moon, which is what all of these ancient cultures held as deities and arguably the secret societies and elite Illuminati types continue to worship.

There are several images of triangles, which are of great importance in Witchcraft and other occult practices (why do you think you see Jay-Z, Rihanna, et.al. flashing it so often?).

Rihanna Illuminati eye triangle

Jay-Z Illuminati eye

The triangle is a magic spell and I go into further detail in my post about Decoding Illuminati Symbolism: Triangles, Pyramids and the Sun:

When researching Witchcraft (‘the craft of the wise’) you can see that the upright triangle is a symbol for the 2nd Degree initiate, in the process of a Witchcraft salute that follows the path of one breast to the other, and then the mouth and back down to the first breast. Conversely, the 1st degree initiate gets a salute of an inverted triangle with breast-breast-genitalia. The principle behind making and closing a triangle with a salute is because of the worship of the feminine triple goddess through a non-Christian version of the trinity.

You’ll notice the triangle shape all throughout the film. The triangle is also used in magic to bring spirits from the dead or the Other Side, as we can later see with Olaf who gets brought to life through magic.

IlluminatiWatcherDotCom Frozen Illuminati Triangle

IlluminatiWatcherDotCom Frozen Illuminati Triangle two

IlluminatiWatcherDotCom Frozen Illuminati Triangle 3

IlluminatiWatcherDotCom Frozen Illuminati Triangle 4

There is also some imagery of a ritual that is performed with the father that resembles Freemasonry:

IlluminatiWatcherDotCom Frozen Illuminati Ritual

Also, did you notice that almost every snowflake is a hexagram; also known as the Seal of Solomon, used to control demons and spirits:

The hexagram combines the two unionized triangles with the Star of David and Seal of Solomon (which used it as a magical sigil for the control supernatural creatures). When talking about magic, the occultists believe a single triangle can be used as a method for summoning spirits. They’ll stand inside of a circle while a spirit is conjured into a triangle during rituals to allow the demons to channel through from the underworld and appear within the triangle.

Seal of Solomon

From Frozen:

IlluminatiWatcherDotCom Frozen Illuminati Seal of Solomon

There’s also the necromancy spell that animates the snowman Olaf to life; effectively raising him from the dead.

Olaf Frozen Illuminati

The parts that actually support the theory that this film is about pro-homosexuality: the song Let it Go. The song actually has some pretty homosexual-ish lyrics if you look at from that viewpoint, so I’ll concede this one point to Skaggs:

Couldn’t keep it in, Heaven knows I tried.
Don’t let them in, don’t let them see.
Be the good girl you always have to be.
Conceal, don’t feel, don’t let them know.
Well, now they know!

Let it go, let it go!
Can’t hold it back any more.
Let it go, let it go!
Turn away and slam the door.

And the fears that once controlled me, can’t get to me at all
It’s time to see what I can do,
to test the limits and break through.
No right, no wrong, no rules for me.
I’m free!

In fact, the song was created and subsequently used to help find a direction for the characters of the film. From PasadenaNews.com:

For the story to work, the filmmakers felt they needed to find a way to thaw out Elsa’s character. That was helped along by songs composed by Robert Lopez, known for his work on “Avenue Q” and “The Book of Mormon,” and his wife, Kristen Anderson-Lopez.

“Up until then, Elsa was pretty much a straightforward villain,” says Lee. “We wanted to know more about her, what she would be like if she could be herself without fear. After that, she was much more complex, more interesting and sympathetic.”

The change required Lee to do some rewriting, which she was happy to do.

“Everything now hangs on the theme of the power of love versus the power of fear,” she said.

Composer Robert Lopez worked on the plays Avenue Q and The Book of Mormon, which both feature some kind of homosexual tones. For example, Avenue Q has a song called If You Were Gay:

NICKY:
YOU CAN COUNT ON ME
TO ALWAYS BE
BESIDE YOU EVERY DAY,
TO TELL YOU IT’S OKAY,
YOU WERE JUST BORN
THAT WAY,
AND, AS THEY SAY,
IT’S IN YOUR DNA,
YOU’RE GAY!

ROD:
BUT I’M NOT GAY!

NICKY:

If you were gay.

…and The Book of Mormon has a character named Elder McKinley who has repressed homosexual views highlighted in the song Turn It Off:

When you start to get confused
Because of thoughts in your head
Don’t feel those feelings
Hold them in instead

Turn it off
Like a light switch
Just go click
It’s a cool little Mormon trick
We do it all the time


When I was in fifth grade
I had a friend, Steve Glade
He and I were close as two friends could be
One thing led to another
And soon I would discover
I was having really strange feelings for Steve

I thought about us on a deserted island
We’d swim naked in the sea and then he’d try and…

Woah!

Turn it off
Like a light switch
There, it’s gone (good for you)
My hetero side just won
I’m all better now

Boys should be with girls
That’s Heavenly Father’s plan
So if you ever feel you’d rather be with a man
Turn it off

and the one line at the end of the film does in fact raise some suspicion that Disney might be pushing some sort of agenda with its metaphor to being in the closet:

I like the open gates”-Anna

We are never closing them again” -Elsa

Here’s that clip:

Beyoncé, Condolezza Rice and Others in Campaign to Ban the Word “Bossy”. Seriously.

bossy

Lean In, an organization created by Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg launched a campaign to ban the b-word. And by that I mean the word “bossy”. To do that, the organization recruited Beyoncé (who’s often involved in elite-funded campaigns), Jennifer Garner and political figure Condolezza Rice. In a cringe-inducing video, they’ve all “committed” to ban the word.

The video supposedly aims to encourage girls to become leaders. Instead of, like, encouraging girls to become leaders, the video actually says: “Let’s just ban the word bossy”. Really? That’s pretty bossy of them. Telling us what words to use and not to use. I’ve known quite a few women who were leaders but who were NOT bossy. They were great leaders with tact and vision who did not feel the need to boss and micro-manage people around because they could. I’ve also known women who were not leaders of anything but were nevertheless bossy. BOSSY. That’s the word to describe that type of person. Deal with it.

But seriously, when I heard about this campaign the first thing that immediately came to mind was the book 1984 and Newspeak. If you are not familiar with this book, here’s George Orwell’s description of Newspeak in the novel’s appendix.

“Newspeak is the official language of Oceania, scheduled for official adoption around 2050, and designed to make the ideological premises of Ingsoc (Newspeak for English Socialism, the Party’s official political alignment) the only expressible doctrine. Newspeak is engineered to remove even the possibility of rebellious thoughts—the words by which such thoughts might be articulated have been eliminated from the language. Newspeak contains no negative terms. For example, the only way to express the meaning of “bad” is through the word “ungood.” Something extremely bad is called “doubleplus ungood.”

In short, in the 1984, Newspeak was developed by the Party to restrict human thought. When there is no word to describe an idea, the idea cannot even take form. In this sense the Ban Bossy campaign appears to take a page right out of 1984. In a broader sense, it is about using feminism to restrict, oppress and re-mold. It is not about equality, it is about creating, in the words of 1984 “thought criminals” and restricting language.

While I believe this superficial, mind-numbingly ridiculous campaign will fail miserably, there is nevertheless a great deal of financial and political power behind it.

As stated above, Lean In was created by Sheryl Sandberg an important figure of the power elite. Before becoming the COO of Facebook, she was Vice President of Global Online Sales and Operations at Google. Before that, she was chief of staff for the United States Secretary of the Treasury. More importantly, she is part of the Brookings Institution and the Council of Foreign Relations – two of the most important elite think tanks in the world. These two institutions alone are responsible for most of the  New World Order-friendly policies adopted by governments today. Sandberg also attended the 2012 Bilderberg meetings which is, as you might know, another elite hotspot.

Ban Bossy is therefore the product of an elite-funded organization which uses feminism as a means of control. To “empower” means to give power. Banning words is the opposite of giving power.

In other news “bossy” is the word of the day. Use it as much as you can today. Here’s a video that goes with the spirit of the day.

P.S. Bossy.

Israeli Independence Produced Nakba Suffering

Yom Ha’atzmaut (Independence Day) commemorates Israel’s May 1948 Declaration of Independence.

Israel

It’s celebrated annually on 5th of Iyar. It’s according to the Hebrew calendar. It’s preceded by Yom Hazikaron. It remembers fallen Israeli soldiers. It’s Israel’s Memorial Day.

Palestinians have reason to mourn. Edward Said explained Palestine’s “holocaust,” saying:

“Every human calamity is different, but there is value in seeing analogies and perhaps hidden similarities.”

He called Nazi extermination “the lowest point of (Jewish) collective existence.”

Palestinians today “are as powerless as Jews were” under Hitler,, he explained. They’re devastated by “power used for evil purposes.”

Ilan Pappe discussed Palestine’s ethnic cleansing. He explained war without mercy.

He did so in exhaustive detail. He obtained previously suppressed documents. He explained what everyone needs to know. More on what he said below.

On May 6, Haaretz headlined “Israel celebrates 66 years of independence,” saying:

“Israelis across the country flocked to public parks and hiking trails on Tuesday to celebrate Independence Day with barbaques and other leisure activities.”

“Earlier Tuesday, (unindicted war criminal) President Shimon Peres kicked off the day with the annual sing-along at (his) President’s Residence in Jerusalem.”

Palestinians didn’t join in. They’re not singing-along. They’ve got no reason to celebrate. Awards Peres gave IDF recipients came at their expense.

Festivities began Monday night. Things did so with pomp, flair and bombast. They kicked off the official Independence Day ceremony.

They included a torch-lighting ceremony. For the first time, all torch-lighters were women.

Peres called on Israelis to “be proud, but never satisfied.” He stopped short of explaining how much more Palestinian land he covets.

He stole plenty earlier as prime minister. He did through other ministerial posts.

“I remember (Israel’s) first days and the dream we had,” he said. “I have to admit that the dream was too small when I see the reality that was born out of it.”

Other festivities included displaying Israeli military might. The IDF opened some of its bases to visitors. Menacing warplanes overflew.

Israeli recounting of events preceding and following its independence twists truth. It reinvents history doing so.

Its war was well-planned. Palestinians never had a chance. In early March 1948, future Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion met with leading Zionists and military officers.

They finalized war plans. It was called Plan D (Dalet in Hebrew). It followed Plans A, B and C.

It bears repeating. It was war without mercy. It reflected Ben-Gurion’s earlier plan. “I am for compulsory transfer,” he said.

“I do not see anything immoral about it,” he claimed. Hundreds of thousands of displaced or murdered Palestinians were considered a small price to pay.

Things unfolded as planned. Independence took six months to achieve.

Arab armies were no match for Israeli strength. False narratives claimed otherwise. Invaders were outmanned and outgunned.

According to Pappe, systematic terror followed. About 800,000 Palestinians were expelled. Doing so reflected genocidal ethnic cleansing.

Hundreds of Arab villages were depopulated. So were 11 urban cities. They included large parts of Jerusalem, Tel-Aviv and Haifa.

Many thousands of innocent victims were massacred. Mass rapes and other atrocities were committed.

Palestinian homes, property and belongings were bulldozed, demolished, and/or burned.

Palestinians wanting to return couldn’t. They were systematically prevented from doing so.

Horrific Israeli crimes were committed. They matched what convicted Nazis were hanged for at Nuremberg.

They included cold-blooded mass murder. Survivors remember Deir Yassin. Other Palestinian villages were targeted the same way. Wholesale slaughter followed. So did mass displacement.

On April 9, 1948, things began. Israeli soldiers entered Deir Yassin. They did so violently. They machine-gunned houses randomly. Many inside were slaughtered.

Remaining villagers were assembled. They were murdered in cold blood. Children and infants weren’t spared. They were treated like adults.

Elderly and infirm victims got no mercy. Women were raped before being killed. Estimates place the death toll at around 120.

An eyewitness said:

“I was (there) when the Jews attacked. (They) closed on the village amid exchanges of fire with us.”

“Once they entered the village, fighting became very heavy in the eastern side and later it spread to other parts, to the quarry, to the village center until it reached the western edge.”

“The Jews used all sorts of automatic weapons, tanks, missiles, cannons. They enter(ed) houses and kill(ed) women and children indiscriminately. The (village) youths…fought bravely.”

Ensuing fighting killed dozens more. Many other villages were attacked the same way. Ethnic cleansing involved mass slaughter and displacement.

It’s longstanding Israeli practice. Official policy aims for maximum land with minimum Arabs. “Every attack has to end with occupation, destruction and expulsion,” said Ben-Gurion.

He meant displace, depopulate, slaughter. Do it without mercy. Erase Palestinian culture and history.

Replace it with Jewish tradition. Twist truth doing it. Justify genocidal slaughter any way it takes. Current Israeli policy hasn’t changed.

Slow-motion genocide replaced decades earlier flank speed. It continues unabated. Forty-seven years of occupation reflect institutionalized persecution.

State terror defines official Israel policy. Palestinians have no power over their daily lives. They’re terrorized. They live in fear for good reason. They face:

economic strangulation;

collective punishment for being Muslims, not Jews;

loss of basic freedoms;

Gaza under siege;

enclosures by separation walls, electric fences and border closings;

regular curfews, roadblocks, and checkpoints;

bulldozed homes, crops and orchards; as well as

arrest, imprisonment, and torture without cause.

They endure assaults, extra-judicial assassinations and punitive taxation.

They’re denied basic services. They’re essential to life and well-being. They include healthcare, education, and living-wage employment.

It’s enough nourishing food and water. International tribunals don’t help. Occupation harshness persists.

Zionism’s roots began things. It became international in scope. Its founder Theodor Herzl said:

“We must expropriate gently the private property on the state assigned to us.”

“We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border…(We must do it by) denying it employment in our country.”

The Al-Nakba Awareness Project (ANAP) involves volunteers with limited resources. They partner with likeminded local, regional and national organizations.

They’re committed for truth and justice. They support universally recognized human and civil rights. They want rule of law principles enforced.

They want Palestinians recognized as victims. They want longtime denied justice reversed. Without it, regional peace is impossible.

Separate isn’t equal. Years ago, two states were possible. No longer, they believe. Israel controls over 60% of West Bank land. More is added daily.

It vows to seize all of Jerusalem. It wants it as Israel’s exclusive capital. One state for all its people equitablely is the only just solution.

Separating people by religion and/or ethnicity unfairly reflects institutionalized apartheid.

A so-called “Jewish and democratic state” is Orwellian. It’s oxymoronic. It faux democracy. It’s solely for Jews.

ANAP endorses “an integrated, egalitarian state with freedom and equal rights for all its citizens.”

Arabs must be treated no less fairly than Jews. Zionism is enemy to Jews and non-Jews alike.

It’s ideologically over-the-top. It surpasses the worst of South Africa’s deplorable past. It’s white, Jewish supremacist.

It’s incompatible with fairness. It denies justice. It’s heading Israel for self-destruction.

Systems short of viability can’t survive. “A house divided against itself can’t stand,” said Lincoln. Forty-seven years is a historical blink-of-the-eye heartbeat.

Israel must repudiate Zionism, ANAP believes. It must “transform itself into a normal, multi-ethnic, constitutional democracy…” It must treat all its people equitably and fairly.

It must move beyond daily struggles. It must renounce war and other forms of violence.

It must embrace peace, equity and justice. It must govern without prejudice to survive.

Israel falls short and then some. It has a choice. Change or eventually perish. There’s no in between.