The Illiminati Program of White Guilt (a.k.a. “privilege”)

saps.jpg_large.jpg

( White Privilege Conference attendees, left, embrace coming minority status.)


In their psychological war against European Christians,
the Illuminati blame white people for Illuminati crimes. As
Jim Goad reports, many whites buy into their own subjugation  


According to conference founder Eddie Moore, Jr., “white supremacy, white privilege, racism and other forms of oppression are designed for your destruction–designed to kill you.”

enslaved children.jpg(left, white children atone of the crimes of mostly Jewish slave traders 200 years ago) 

If that’s the case, privileged whites are doing a piss-poor job, seeing as how the 400,000 or so Africans who were transported to the New World in slave ships have–through the noxious evils of white privilege, white technology, and living amid a predominantly white culture–blossomed into around 40 million modern American blacks. That’s an increase of 100-1 and truly the most inept genocide in world history.

“Assuming they have brains, how do they keep them from exploding?”

I could be wrong, but at least judging from pictures taken at the event, most of the attendees, local hosts, and T-shirt models appeared to be white, although I’d bet they’d say “whiteness” is a social construct all while accepting guilt (and perhaps private S&M whippings) for the idea that they benefit from “white privilege” even though whiteness is nothing more than an idea. Assuming they have brains, how do they keep them from exploding? I bet they’d crawl out of their skin if they could. They make my skin crawl.

A Wisconsin reporter estimates that the conference at minimum cost taxpayers $20,000 to further indoctrinate already brainwashed educators that white taxpayers are beastly, innately exploitative fanged vampires who deserve extinction.

hardtosee.jpgWorkshops during the four-day extravaganza included “White American Islamophobia,” “White Privilege and the Color of Wealth,” “Death of the Strong Black Sista,” “How Do We Talk About Privilege, For Real?” “Against the Tea Party Movement,” “White Women’s Guide to Teaching Black Boys,” and “Beyond Kumbaya: Promoting Privilege Discussions on College Campuses.” Film screenings included such cinematic thought-turds as The N!GGA Word, What Makes Me White, and The New Black.

Apparently the only way to dismantle white privilege and usher in this long-promised and long-delayed era of post-racial harmony is to be absolutely fucking obsessed with race.

Phenotypically white professor Joe Feagin, past president of the American Sociology Association and author of Living With Racism and White Racism as well as roughly ten million other books about how white people are racist meanies, came dressed in his trademark sexy bolo tie.

He purportedly claimed that all white people are either racists or “recovering racists” and allegedly uttered things such as “The white racial frame is more than cognitive. It’s hostile, vicious, emotional, and visual,”

aa-White-dispossession-very-good-chart1-210x300.jpg“Whites live the white racial frame like goldfish in a bowl of water,” and “The heart of the white racial frame is white virtue/superiority. This is (unsurprisingly) the hardest thing for white people to see.”

Feagin allegedly closed his speech with words from Martin Luther King and a photo of black American runners famously giving the Black Power salute at the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City. How urban and edgy of him!

What’s easy for me to see–and unlike Joe Feagin, I don’t wear glasses, rose-colored or otherwise–is that Joe Feagin is a white man suffering the late stages of Passover Syndrome.

Scanning the sponsors listed in the center column of the WPC’s home page reveals a multicolored cornucopia of logos from likeminded churches and colleges. I don’t attend church, so it is the colleges that I–to lift a ubiquitous progressive buzzword–find “problematic.” Why are such absurd and absolutely unscientific medieval guilt scenarios–where “whiteness” is reduced to “evil” and Europeans’ lopsidedly abundant contributions to science, art, and global longevity are either ignored or fraudulently dismissed as thievery from other cultures–being injected like mind-numbing psychiatric drugs into children’s brains?

Behold passages from the conference’s “Youth Action Project” page:

Students will SEE and be fully aware of the multiple manifestations of white supremacy, white privilege, and other forms of oppression.

• Students will have the courage and confidence to NAME white supremacy, white privilege, and other forms of oppression.
• Students will ACT by taking effective, creative, and urgent measures to dismantle white supremacy, white privilege, and other forms of oppression.
• Students will PROCEED as leaders, planting ongoing seeds of change.

Apparently teaching students to READ and WRITE and ADD and SUBTRACT are no longer priorities. No, you have to constantly teach them–at least the white ones–not to be racist, which tends to undermine the oft-parroted canard that children need to be taught TO be racist.

So which one is it? If white kids need to be bitch-slapped from grades one through sixteen with the idea that white “racism” is bad, that would suggest they’d fall back into instinctual tribalism the moment you quit browbeating them. Your tirelessly aggressive indoctrination schemes imply a deep-seated insecurity about whether your beliefs are natural or have to be force-fed through tireless governmental, corporate, media, and religious brainwashing.

pack-your-bags.-we.jpgThe only good idea that seemed to emerge from this farcical pink-pig hog-sloppin’ guilt-fest came via a Tweet from a conference attendee: “maybe we should stop giving black boys to white women teachers.”

I think that’s a capital idea, especially if the white women teachers are the typical self-loathing breed so prevalent these days–and by that I mean they hate the “white” part of themselves rather than the “female” part. I don’t even think you need to set any new policies to make this a reality. If you keep pounding the idea that “whiteness = evil” into the skulls of the nation’s increasingly nonwhite student population, those melanin-rich young’uns will eventually demand that white men and women stop teaching them altogether. Purely by delicious accident, white teachers will wind up softly erasing themselves like so much chalk from the blackboard. – See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2014/05/The-Illiminati-Program-of-White-Guilt.html#sthash.OgXHJTLU.dpuf

The Jewish Strategy Behind “Civil Rights”

aa-donald-sterling-and-black-ex-gf.jpgThe Donald Sterling uproar has put Jewish-Black relations in the spotlight.
As Kevin MacDonald shows, the Illuminati Jewish bankers were behind civil rights
as a strategy to undermine America’s European racial heritage. The
same strategy applies to mass in-migration and “diversity.”

“Jewish organizations view white nationalism as their greatest potential threat and they have tended to support pro-black integration (i.e., assimilationist, individualist) policies for blacks in America, presumably because such policies dilute white power and lessen the possibility of a cohesive, nationalist anti-Jewish white majority.” — Harold Cruse, a black intellectual.

1. The Ashkenazi Jews that dominate the American Jewish community have the highest average intelligence of any human group and they have shown an extraordinary ability to create and participate in highly effective groups in pursuit of their interests.

joel-elias-spingarn-1.jpg(left, Joel Spingarn,  chairman of the board of NAACP from 1913 to 1919, its treasurer from 1919 to 1930, its second president from 1930-1939.)

2.  Jews played a prominent role in organizing blacks beginning with the founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909 and, despite increasing black anti-Semitism, continuing into the present. The NAACP was founded by wealthy German Jews, non – Jewish whites, and blacks led by W. E. B. DuBois.  The Jewish role was predominant: By mid-decade [ c. 1915], the NAACP had something of the aspect of an adjunct of B’nai B’rith and the American Jewish Committee, with the brothers Joel and Arthur Spingarn serving as board chairman and chief legal counsel, respectively; Herbert Lehman on the executive committee; Lillian Wald and Walter Sachs on the board (though not simultaneously); and Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg as financial angels. By 1920, Herbert Seligman was director of public relations, and Martha Gruening served as his assistant. . . . Small wonder that a bewildered Marcus Garvey stormed out of NAACP headquarters in 1917, muttering that it was a white organization

3.  The B’nai Brith ADL continues to be a major promoter of diversity education through its A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE ® Institute. Since 1985, this institute has trained more than 230,000 elementary and secondary school teachers in diversity education and has conducted workplace diversity training programs for workers and college students in the United States. Teacher training programs have also been instituted in Germany and Russia.

JolsonAl.jpg(left, the black-faced Jew – Al Jolson in the Jazz Singer) 

4. After all, at least until the 1960s blacks had not shown themselves to be able to develop effective organizations without Jewish input. Blacks, as a low-achieving group, continue to have relatively little power and influence in ethnic relations in the United States and remain underrepresented in all the elite institutions of society. Because of their high intelligence, their high level of mobilization, and their over-representation in elite institutions of the government, the media, business, and the academic world, Jewish influence is far out of proportion to their numbers. White non-Jews have relatively little influence compared to Jews because of their lack of mobilization to achieve their ethnic interests. Moreover, continuing Jewish involvement in the media and in funding black organizations remains an important ingredient in black success long after the leadership of these organizations passed to blacks. For example, Murray Friedman notes that after 1955 blacks assumed the leadership of the movement: “No longer would Jewish leaders and other outsiders call the shots. They would work behind the scenes, providing money and advice to [Martin Luther] King and his lieutenants, who would head the movement, win the headlines, and endure the jail sentences.”

5. Despite representing only 2.5% of the population, Jews provide over half of the funding of the Democratic Party, and in the 2000 election, 80% of Jews voted for Gore.

6. When interviewed about their own motivations, Jews tend to see themselves as altruists in aiding black causes, or they “believe that Jewish concern for black people was ‘natural,’ growing out of parallel experiences of suffering and oppression.” During the high point of the civil rights movements Jews and Jewish organizations “redefined Judaism as synonymous with liberalism.” A commonly expressed attitude was that Jewish work on behalf of civil rights reflected the “universalist ethics” of Judaism. This view ignores the history of Judaism as a closed ingroup with a profoundly particularist moral outlook with very different moral standards for ingroup members and outgroup members. In the contemporary world, the most egregious example of Jewish moral particularism is the reality of Israel as an expansionist apartheid state. Jews in Israel have subjected the Palestinians to a brutal occupation aimed ultimately at expanding their territory to include the land conquered in the 1967 war; American Jews have been strong supporters of Israel, and in recent years the organized American Jewish community has favored the rightist Likud party in Israel and its aggressive policies toward the Palestinians. Many of the supporters of the Likud are hyper -ethnocentric members of the settler movement and other forms of Jewish fundamentalism.

jews-blacks-feminists.jpg7. Harold Cruse, a black intellectual, observes that Jewish organizations view white nationalism as their greatest potential threat and they have tended to support pro-black integration (i.e., assimilationist, individualist) policies for blacks in America, presumably because such policies dilute white power and lessen the possibility of a cohesive, nationalist anti-Jewish white majority. At the same time, Jewish organizations have opposed a black nationalist position while pursuing an anti-assimilationist, nationalist group strategy for their own group

8. Besides the movement to alter ethnic relations discussed here, Jewish organizations took the lead in altering U.S. immigration policy in the direction of large-scale multi – ethnic immigration. 95 Mass multi – ethnic immigration continues to be a consensus position within the U.S. Jewish community, and several Jewish activists have noted the advantage to be gained by Jews of an America where white political and demographic hegemony has declined and whites are unable to control their own political destiny. Most recently, Leonard S. Glickman, president and CEO of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, stated, “The more diverse American society is the safer [Jews] are.” Having run out of Russian Jews, the HIAS is now deeply involved in recruiting refugees from Africa — a new twist on the black – Jewish alliance

9.Jewish motivation need not be seen in defensive terms, of course, but rather as aimed at maximizing Jewish power. The reality is that the rise of the Jews in the United States as well as the rise of their black allies and the millions of post – 1965 non – white immigrants has been accompanied by a consequent decline in the power of the old white Protestant elites.

10. Jewish activism played an essential and critical role in the revolution in ethnic relations which has occurred in the last 50 years in the U.S. It is a revolution that in its major premises has been internalized also by a large portion of the whites in the U.S. and other Western countries, particularly elite whites who have made alliances with Jews and other components of the multi-ethnic elites.

Nixon Was Framed by the Illuminati

nixon.jpg

Richard Nixon was framed by the elite. Coming from Mark Gorton, this conclusion is all the more interesting.

Gorton is a respected engineer,  millionaire financier and entrepreneur.
He founded the music sharing site Limewire, and he runs Tower Research, a famed high-frequency trading firm.

Gorton also believes that a ruthless “secret cabal” led by H.W. Bush  assassinated JFK and planned 9/11.
A “criminal network” controls government and business “yet most people don’t have any idea that it exists.”
He circulated these conclusions to employees last week. Generally, they are a synopsis of his reading.

He is naive about some things — that a coup d’etat took place in 1963 when in fact the US has been run by
the Illuminati since Theodore Roosevelt or earlier.  He is wrong about others – like the Saudis and the Bushes
were behind  9-11. (No mention of the Mossad or Freemasons – Gorton is probably Jewish.)  But his assessment of
Richard Nixon and Watergate seems correct to me, and I present it here.
In 1945, Richard Nixon was a US Navy lawyer assigned to look in captured Nazi documents which showed Nazi collusion with Allen Dulles. In exchange for helping to cover up the Dulles war time treason, Allen Dulles and Prescott Bush agreed to help finance Nixon’s political career.

In 1946, Nixon was able to win election to the house of representatives with their contributions. In 1947, the Dulles brothers took Nixon under their wing and escorted him on a tour of Fascist ‘freedom fight’ operations in Germany. Through the late 1940’s and early 1950’s, Nixon proved himself as a loyal ally. In return, Prescott Bush was instrumental in selecting Nixon as the Vice Presidential candidate in 1952. Nixon was in the odd position of being an ally of key Cabal members while never being a member of the inner circle. Nixon was politically ambitious and willing to work with distasteful people and do distasteful things in order to further his political career, yet at the same time, he resented being dependent on these powerful, corrupt interests.

MARK-GORTON-large570.jpg(Gorton, left)

Once Nixon was elected to his second term as president in 1972, he achieved a degree of independence that made him a danger to the Cabal. Deep down, Nixon was never as corrupt as core Cabal members, and toward the end of his first term, he began making plans to purge the entire senior leadership of the CIA. Unfortunately, Nixon did not realize the the CIA had the White House bugged and filled his senior staff  with spies. So the Cabal leadership was well aware of Nixon’s plans. Nixon had a reputation for being paranoid. Yet he was not paranoid enough. His enemies had him surrounded to a degree which he did not understand.

In 1973, after Nixon has stopped being a compliant servant of the Cabal, they set off the booby trap in the form of the Watergate Coup, and they pulled Nixon down from power just as they put him up.

WATERGATE

The traditional story of Watergate is one where Nixon does a bunch of bad things, gets caught, tries to cover it up, and is forced to resign; however, in reality Watergate was a plot by the Cabal behind the JFK assassination and corrupt elements within the CIA and military intelligence to depose Nixon.

The Watergate Coup served several purposes, but perhaps its most lasting impact was to ensconce George H.W. Bush as the new head of the Cabal. Like his father, George H.W. Bush was a graduate of Yale and a member of Skull and Bones. In a world where connections and pedigree mattered, George H. W. Bush was the crown prince within the CIA.

The first stages of the Watergate Coup involved creating a fake scandal to force the resignation of Vice President Spiro Agnew. With Agnew out of the way, the Watergate Coup plotters were free to place one of their own in position to take the presidency. Nixon wanted to appoint John Connolly of Texas as VP, but Connolly was not a Cabal member, so the Republican establishment loyal to Bush threatened to block Connolly’s nomination, and Nixon was forced to pick a Vice President acceptable to the Cabal.

Gerald Ford, as a member of the Warren Commission, had played a key role in covering up the Coup of ’63. Ford was not an inner circle member of the Cabal behind the Coup of ’63, but he was solidly aligned with them and could be counted on to support and enable the secret government structures buried within the national security state.

The Watergate burglars themselves were headed by CIA agent E. Howard Hunt. Hunt had been a key operational player in the Coup of ’63. He was even clearly photographed as one of the three tramps arrested near Dealey Plaza immediately after the shooting of JFK. On his death bed, Hunt confessed to his involvement in the Coup of ’63 and named LBJ as the leader of the plot. To execute the Watergate break in, Hunt rounded up some old Cuban comrades who had also been active in supporting JFK’s assassination. To those in the know, the makeup of the Watergate burglars was a clear signal that Watergate was a plot on behalf of the Cabal behind the Coup of ’63.

To execute the disinformation campaign surrounding Watergate, the Watergate Coup plotters turned to ex-naval intelligence officer, Bob Woodward, who had been inserted into the Washington Post. Woodward then proceeded to craft a series of stories that make up much of the myth of Watergate that we know today.

clintonx.jpgIn order to complete the take down of Nixon, the President had to be denied the due process which could have allowed him an effective legal defense before the House Judiciary Committee where the impeachment resolutions regarding Watergate had been referred. At this time, in 1973, a young Hillary Clinton was working as a staff lawyer for the committee.

Even this early in her career, Clinton showed her willingness to ally herself with powerful, corrupt interests. Clinton along with several other staff members of the committee conspired to deny Nixon access to legal counsel. In order to pull this off, Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief and confiscated public documents to hide her deception. Her boss Jeffery Zeifman later fired Hillary for her unethical actions and said about Hillary, “She was a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

Does History Follow Rothschild Masterplan?

This period cartoon illustrates the crowned heads of Europe — the ostensible rulers of the day — bowing before Lionel Rothschild on his throne of mortgages, loans and cash. In fact, this was the reality of the day, the effective fruition of the age-old Jewish dream of a New World Order — a Jewish Utopia — in which all other peoples of the planet would bow down and worship the Jewish people, the new rulers of the Earth. For good reason, indeed, Rothschild was known as the “king of kings.” (Michael Collins Piper- The New Babylon
The ideology behind the New World Order may be Jewish Messianism, the view that God has chosen “the King of the Jews” to rule the world. This “Messiah,” or antichrist, will be selected from the ranks of the Rothschild family.

This argument is espoused in a rare, suppressed book entitled “Elijah, Rothschilds and the Ark of the Covenant” by Tom Crotser & Jeremiah Patrick (Restoration Press, 1984.)

The book details the Rothschild’s quest for and discovery of the Ark of the Covenant, a gold-covered box supposedly built by Moses to hold  Aaron’s Rod and the original Ten Commandment tablets. Apparently the Rothschilds intend to place this in Salomon’s Temple in Jerusalem to legitimize their claim to be the Messiah.

(Rothschilds and Israeli leaders study model of Rothschild sponsored Israeli Supreme Court, destined to be World Court.)

According to the authors, this bizarre vision rooted in Biblical prophesy is behind economic and political events today. The Zionist vision is much larger than a Jewish homeland.  “The Messianic hope promises the establishment by the Jews of world power in Palestine to which all the nations of the earth will pay homage.”  (p. 29)

“This glorious age can only be affected by a man, a scion of the House of David” who will lead the Jews to “righteousness” and “regenerate” the human race.

According to the Talmud, this Messiah from the seed of David shall subjugate the heathen nations and make Israel the world power.

Summarizing the Talmud, Rabbi Michael Higger wrote that:  “All the treasures and natural resources of the world will eventually come in possession of the righteous.” This, he said, would be in keeping, with thy prophecy of Isaiah: “In her gain and her hire shall be holiness to the Lord; it shall be not treasured nor laid out, for her gain shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat their fill and for stately clothing.” (The Jewish Utopia, 1932)

Obviously, the majority of Jews are not informed of this plan, the easier to manipulate them.

MESSIAH MAKERS
The Rothschilds saw themselves in the role of Messiah-facilitator, if not Messiah.

As early as 1836, Anselm Meyer Rothschild received a letter from rabbi Hirsch Kalischer, who revealed to him the divine plan: “Let no one imagine that the Messiah will appear suddenly and amid miracles and wonders, lead the Israelites to their ancient inheritance. The beginning of the redemption will be in a natural way, by the desire of the Jews to settle in Palestine, and the willingness of the nations to help them in this work.”

When we consider that the Jewish holocaust was critical for the establishment of Israel, Messianism gives modern history a totally new twist. The holocaust likely was part of a plan to prepare the groundwork for the appearance of a Jewish Messiah.  After Jews had returned to Palestine and the Temple was rebuilt, “then will God show them all the miracles in accordance with the description given by the prophets and the sages…God will send His prophet and his anointed king,” Kalischer wrote. 


edmund.jpg(Edmund de Rothschild, on Israel 500 shekel note)

Albert Cohen, Edmund de Rothschild’s tutor, shared Kalischer’s views and imbued them in his pupil. As a result Edmund de Rothschild funded the Jewish colonization of Palestine in the 19th century.

Edmund de Rothschild engineered the famous Dreyfus Affair in order to create anti-Semitism and force Jews to support Israel as a refuge.

He established his own administration in Palestine, set up agricultural colonies and bought all the produce at a fixed price. Between 1887 and 1899, he made three trips to his many far flung settlements.

DEBT

The Rothschilds bend the nations to their will by means of debt. Moses relates the basic principle in Deuteronomy 15:6: “Thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shalt not reign over thee.”

The authors write: “Note that this is not a suggestion given in the Scriptures. It is a command from the God of Israel. Lending upon usury is how to possess the land.” (175)

“Lending on interest for consumer and emergency needs became a virtual Jewish monopoly in Western Europe between the 12th and 15th centuries…As security, real estate was most preferred. In this way Jews acquired in pledge houses, vineyards, farms, villages, castles, towns, and even provinces. ” (177)

“The rise of absolute monarchies in Central Europe brought numbers of Jews into the influential position of negotiating loans for the various royal courts. The phenomenon of court Jews now continued into Europe. The most famous included Lehmann, Oppenheimer and Goldschmidt in Germany and Austria.” (180)

“Jean Izolulet, a member of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universal wrote in 1932: ‘The meaning of history of the last century is that today 300 Jewish financiers, all masters of lodges, rule the world.” (183)

“Vatican City came under Rothschild influence in the early 19th century…Pope John Paul II admitted the Roman Catholic Church is still tied to the Rothschilds…In Sept 1979, the Pope revealed the Church had $50 billion invested in various Rothschild banks…” (191)

CONCLUSION

Edmund de Rothschild was playing a role in a larger drama which would see his successor finally become the anti-Christ. This required that Jews return to Palestine, and that required a huge Rothschild-organized pogrom in Europe. (see “Hitler was a Godsend for Israel” )

The author of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion repeatedly refers to world conquest in terms of “when we have come into our kingdom.” I am convinced he was a Rothschild.

Jewish Messianism throws both historical and current events into new perspective. Through debt, the Rothschild syndicate is bending the nations of the world to their will. Through the “Arab Spring” and the destruction of Libya and Syria, stragglers are brought into line. Finally, Iran may be brought to heel in a war pitting Rothschild’s NATO client states against Iran and possibly Russia and China, also client states.

The Cabalist Jewish bankers (the Illuminati) have a long-range plan for the ascendance of their “Messiah.”  Actually the antichrist, he will be “the King of the Jews” to be selected from the House of Rothschild. Unfortunately, the “Messiah” who will emerge from this turmoil will not redeem the world. Rather he will condemn mankind to centuries of suffering and darkness. Most Jews are not privy to this plan.

We have the dubious honor of witnessing the consummation of a centuries-old plan for world tyranny based on satanic megalomania and demented Biblical prophesies.

Is Putin False Opposition?

starofputin.jpgThe Illuminati is using Russia-US friction over Ukraine
to lay the groundwork for World War Three.
The dialectical opposition between Russia
and the US is a little too neat to be credible.

It’s almost as if the USSR and the USA have changed
places.

In March, when Hillary Clinton compared Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler, she was preparing the framework for World War Three.

Like the Second World War, the potential Third will represent resistance to Masonic Jewish world hegemony.  It will pit nationalists against (Zionist) “globalists.” The only question is whether, like Hitler, Putin represents “false opposition.”

The Protocols of Zion  stated, “Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us it is only pro forma at out discretion and by our direction…” (9)

Is this still true? My sense is that it is. Russia has a Rothschild central bank. Putin confers with Henry Kissinger regularly.

All wars are orchestrated. The globalists would not risk a world war in which they could be destroyed.

PUTIN THE WHITE KNIGHT

Writing for The American Free Press & The Barnes Report , Michael Collins Piper shows how Putin is the dialectical opposite of the satanic Zionist West, just like Hitler and Stalin were opposite twins.

putinfaith.jpg(left. Putin proclaims his new found faith)

In the midst of all of the media frenzy targeting Putin, the bottom line is that Putin and Russia are being hammered relentlessly because Putin is viewed as an ideologically-based force representing a long-standing, deeply rooted Russian nationalist ideology, one closely bound to the Orthodox Christian faith.

Not in modern times has there been one such as Putin, rising up to challenge what is known as the New World Order and the war on Christian tradition. A careful survey of the elite media in recent weeks underscores the fact that the global elite are very much concerned about the nationalist ideology taking hold in Russia under Putin.

For popular consumption, warmongering Republican Arizona demagogue Sen. John McCain wrote in The New York Times on March 14: “Russia is not a great power on par with America. It is a gas station run by a corrupt, autocratic regime.”

His inflammatory comments were echoed remarks during the 2012 presidential campaign when GOP candidate Mitt Romney called Russia “without question our No. 1 geopolitical foe,” an extraordinary pronouncement revealing what the hard-line Zionist neoconservatives telling Romney what to say were thinking.

Putin has earned the wrath of the would-be world shapers among the likes of those who make up such high-level instruments of geopolitical planning such as the Bilderberg group, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations. He has also offended the sensibilities of the interconnected Jewish families and financial groups that make up the driving force behind an intended global Zionist imperium based in Israel but wielding its power across the planet.”

On March 30 the Washington Post featured a commentary by Anne Applebaum–another Jewish critic of Putin– entitled “Russia’s anti-Western thinking takes hold.” She wrote: Russia’s ideology may be a mishmash: the old Soviet critique of hypocritical “bourgeois democ- racy,” plus some anti-Europeanism, some anti-globalism and a homophobic twist for contemporary appeal. But let’s not assume that competition between ideas is absurd and old- fashioned. And let’s not pretend that ideologies don’t matter, because, even if we’d prefer otherwise, they do.

gessen.jpgThe next day, on March 31, the Washington Post published a column by Russian-born Jewish journalist Masha Gessen, left, who asserted that Putin’s mission is “saving the world from the West.” Gessen wrote: “Over the past two years, a new ideology has taken shape at the Kremlin. Insistently pushed out over the airwaves of state-controlled television, it has taken hold as Russia’s national idea–and is the driving force behind its newly aggressive international posture. Russia is remaking itself as the leader of the anti-Western world.”

Does all of this foreshadow war against Russia? That remains to be seen.

PUTIN WEARS THE WHITE HAT

Clearly Russia is on the side of the angels in this conflict. The Jewish NeoCons who spearhead the Masonic Jew World Order are guilty of aggression in Ukraine, as they have been everywhere else. They will have a hard time marshaling support domestically or even abroad. In a recent issue of World Affairs Brief, Joel Skousen notes that the Germans are losing patience with the US.

Part of the problem in getting the Germans to spurn Russian energy and trade ties is the growing hostility toward America as well as German dependence on Russian fuel and natural gas. After the NSA spying scandal broke, the German Interior Minister said, “the USA is operating without any kind of boundaries.” He also mentioned that “approval ratings for Americans in German polls are lower right now than they have been in a long time. The last time this was the case was during a certain phase of the policies of George W. Bush.”

Der Spiegel said that, “Germany is pulling closer to Russia out of its own self-interest and disgust with the U.S. We are so used to thinking of Germany as allied with the U.S. against Russia, this may be hard for most Americans to conceive. But this is how alliances change–with a first step.

How much easier to destroy the US than when it’s clearly in the wrong? When its best generals have been purged and women are in combat? This may be the agenda – which a war which the US will lose, a perfect opportunity to purge “dissidents’ and cull the population.

On the other hand, the US has been exercising remarkable restraint with mostly bluster and meaningless sanctions. Russia also has been careful to avoid confrontation.  Having secured essential Black Sea access, it is in no hurry to annex Eastern Ukraine. The accord negotiated in Geneva recently
shows that, whatever the Illuminati have planned, the minions holding the levers of power in East and West have no appetite for war.

putinandjews.jpgIs Putin false opposition?

Yes. But, at the same time, the differences between East and West seem real. They represent two Masonic mafias, one pretending to be nationalist and religious, the other proudly satanic. But the Russian mob will not agree to being exploited and controlled by the Zionist mob.

As Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin said in an interview with Charlie Rose, we want to be equal and not “Junior” partners with the West. Whether this foreshadows war with Russia, as Piper says, remains to be seen.

A final note. We should forget the “Polish Presidential plane crash” in Smolensk in April 2010 when Putin presided over the murder of the Polish nationalist elite. The fact that no Western leaders attended the funeral indicates that this was done with Illuminati approval. This is another indication that Putin is a member of the club.

White Minority Status a Political Time Bomb

majority-minority.jpg

Studies show that Whites vote Republican when confronted
with the prospect of becoming a minority. But instead of
exploiting this potent issue, the GOP is urged to abandon
their base and cater to the future majority.

 

 

“We will undermine every collective identity except our own.” – The Protocols of Zion
“Collective identity” refers to race, religion (God), nation and family (gender). Obviously the GOP are Freemasons
or this would be an issue. Kevin MacDonald shows that academia is actively conspiring with the Illuminati.

“We will undermine every collective identity except our own.” 
 
 [“Collective identity” refers to race, religion (God), nation and family (gender)] – Protocols of Zion, the blueprint of the New World Order   They promote immigration, homosexuality and miscegenation to destroy the white race.  

– See more at: http://henrymakow.com/obamas-coalition-of-the-have-n.html#sthash.RNY3zuAX.dpuf

It’s one thing to be demonized when you are the majority, but a far different thing when you are the minority.

A study* by Northwestern University psychologists Maureen A. Craig (a white woman) and Jennifer A. Richeson (an
African-American) shows that Whites are on the “precipice” of becoming a minority in America, and are becoming more conservative as a result. [US Census indicates White babies are now a minority.]

Needless to say, despite Craig-Richeson’s use of the word “precipice”, they do not view whites’ impending minority status as problematic. Indeed, they are eager to suggest ways to make Whites complacent about their fate…

The Craig-Richeson study illuminates … why the Republican Party is rapidly becoming de facto the party of White America: American politics is simply becoming racialized as a result of identity politics. In the 2012 election, a majority of Whites of all social classes, both sexes, and all age groups voted Republican. Obama won only 36% of the votes of non-college whites–a group that traditionally voted Democrat when social class issues were paramount…

For reasons that would bear analysis, GOP strategists ignore this possibility. But the Craig-Richeson study suggests that this GOP whitening trend will accelerate anyway, as it becomes increasingly difficult for whites to escape diversity. When the effects of the immigration tsunami are all around, it begins to dawn on people that their country is being taken away…

Craig and Richeson found that Whites confronted with their impending minority status are concerned that their social status will suffer, and this motivates their attraction to conservatism. Craig’s reaction is particularly blatant:

“These findings may be particularly relevant to media and government agencies who are currently reporting on these racial shifts, presumably without awareness of these potential threat effects,” Craig told Association for Psychological Science. “We’re working on ways to present information regarding these very real and important shifts in the country’s racial demographics that don’t engender these type of threat responses and, instead, promote positive relations among members of the majority and minority groups.”

You see, Craig, along with the rest of the academic Establishment, is entirely on board with eliminating America’s white majority through immigration policy. So the problem, as they see it, is not how to prevent the shifts, but how to make them palatable. How can the fears of white Americans be made to disappear so they won’t be drawn to the evil that is inherent in conservative political opinions and the Republican Party? How can White America be induced to embrace the harmonious multicultural future as America enters the golden age of diversity (and White America heads into the sunset)?

Craig and Richeson added a condition where some subjects read a paragraph reassuring them that white social status “is unlikely to change” even after whites become a minority (the “assuaged threat condition”).

Voilà! Simply add a reassuring paragraph and the status-threat disappears! Frame the issue by reassuring whites that they will not suffer economically from becoming a minority, and they will be more likely to endorse Leftist nostrums approved by academic and MSM elites….

RACIAL POLARIZATION

American racial and ethnic landscape is already well on the way to polarization. Already an average of 80% of non-Whites voted for Obama in the last election. Whites have been relatively less polarized, even though 60% voting Republicanin recent elections. But all the indications are that they are becoming more so. Not only are the majority of Whites of all social classes, both sexes, and all age groups voting Republican, as I mentioned above, but Republicans are increasing their share of the White vote by 1.5% in every presidential election cycle since 1992.[ “Does GOP Have to Pass Immigration Reform?, By Sean Trende,RealClearPolitics, June 25, 2013]

This is occurring despite a virtual blackout of discussion of the impending white minority in the MSM. Imagine how quickly polarization would increase if the racial shift were emphasized–and especially the downside for Whites. Imagine how hard it would be to sell the immigration amnesty/surge bill to white America if its acceleration of the racial shift were publicized.

The general lack of awareness also shows that there is a huge untapped source of conservative strength in the US: Accentuating the impending eclipse of White America would result in an upsurge of support for conservative positions on a wide range of issues.

The fact that the subjects in these experiments seemed unaware of these population shifts prior to the experiment is a telling testimony to the power of the MSM in shaping perceptions. Deciding what’s not fit to print is at least as important as what is fit to print.

So it’s no accident that the MSM is intensively policed to eliminate voices that conflict with the Leftist world view–people like Pat Buchanan, Glenn Beck, and Lou Dobbs. This is why Media Matters was so upset when CNN quoted VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow and James Edwards on immigration-related issues. [CNN Article Legitimizes “Pro-White” Commentators, by Todd Gregory, March 4, 2011]

And of course the Establishment Conservative media is no better. It’s interesting that when New York Magazine’s  Jonathan Chait reviewed studies on the effects of liberal domination of the entertainment media, he reported that conservative talk radio and Fox News harp on “the fears that torment conservatives today–overweening regulators, welfare layabouts, the government seizing our guns” –anything but the fear of becoming a minority. [The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy Is on Your Screen, August 19, 2012]

The political landscape would change rather quickly and dramatically if one above-ground, widely available, well-funded, MSM outlet told the truth.

But the data show that the landscape is changing anyway. Despite the MSM, Whites are waking up to the reality of their dispossession, even if the changes are slow. In the next 30 years, fewer and fewer whites will be able to escape the consequences of the immigration onslaught. The political landscape will continue to be more racially polarized. Whites will be looking for leadership that addresses their fears. Conservatism Inc. boilerplate about government regulation,welfare queens and even gun rights won’t hack it. Politicians like Jeb Bush, and the others who came to genuflect before Sheldon Adelson won’t cut it.

What will appeal to these whites–the great majority of whites–is explicit talk about white identity and white interests.

It will be a revolution.

A Reality Show of Your Life – Would You Watch?

realityshow.jpg

The best reader responses are below.

In case anyone is curious about me, no I would not watch
a reality show based on my life; nor would anyone else.
My life takes place inside my head. Nothing to see!
That’s how I get through these long Manitoba winters.

Dennis- Unless they handed out awards for MOST boring show ever.

I
have brought this subject up to my wife several times in the recent
past. We laugh at how boring our life is and how no-one would watch us
as we sat in bed ,her watching tv and me reading. Her disturbing my
reading with something she thinks is funny or suspenseful, and me trying
to ignore her attempts to distract my reading, or me glaring at her
when she succeeds. Unless somebody finds a couple of people living with
four dogs as a good use of time, it is unlikely to have any viewership.

Bill It’s tough being sane in an insane world.

My life reminds me of the Grateful Dead song Truckin’, which includes the line: what a long, strange trip it’s been. My mom and dad are gone, as is my sister, my ex-wife and daughter (who has not spoken to me for 3 years – no explanation given). The only family I have left is my brother Bob, who is married with two kids and always busy. Fortunately, we are very close, so when we do chat, it’s very nourishing. One thing we both agree on: Life is strange and people are weird.

When I get to sharing stories with people, I often hear, “you should write a book.” Which brings me to your question: If your life were a reality show, would you watch it? My answer is NO. At least not without some glamorization. I lost too often. It’s quite pitiful. So much potential going to waste.

I thought “being saved” and giving my life to God would change things. It had a positive effect at first, but then a negative effect later. Now I am free from that mindfuck, as well as the marriage and family craziness (I married a Filipina in Cebu City in 1988. My experience was similar to yours.) At 58, the “need” for a female sex partner and companion is finally subsiding. This is a huge blessing.

My focus these days is on being fully aware of life “in the moment.” It goes by fast, so enjoy each pain-free moment. I am content living alone in my comfortable condo. Peace and quiet, surrounded by nature in warm, sunny Florida. Life is good. Now, if the Government would stop attacking us from all directions, my stress level would be much healthier. It’s tough being sane in an insane world.
—–

Denny- Modernity is one big show.

My life already is a “reality show” and yes I am watching it as I live it. Krishnamurti once coined the phrase: The Observer is the Observed, which sounds rather esoteric but is confirmed by physicist Dr. David Bohm. When observing subatomic particles scientists discovered that the very act of observing the particle actually had an affect on it — meaning……our very awareness of something (focused attention) actually changes it.

Observing this “show” is indeed having an affect but whether the whole season gets pulled or has a long run is anybody’s guess. Complete with sites like yours (the good guys) exposing the Illuminati (the bad guys), consumer zombies, fembots and clueless Liberals thickens the plot indeed. Not being a fan of TV in general…. no I would not watch it but I am “observing” it…….reluctantly. Modernity is one big show.

Jim- I feel I’m in the show waiting for the gong.

My life has been a good one so far fighting the battle against the evil empire. My name is Jim R I live in Framingham Massachusetts. I produce four-hour long cable shows that air on local cable TV that basically do what you are doing but in video on TV.  My shows deal with news topics from all over the internet that are very controversial and not shown on regular TV. One of my main topics has been the Holocaust Hoax and all things relating to it. Why I say my life is a reality show is because so far the Jews haven’t had the balls to come after me for exposing their Hoax, which surprises me, as they took my show off the air in 2010 for a year. I guess they finally came to a realization that free speech is part of the fabric of life in the U. S. So the question remains how long will the Jews allow me to function? When will they make their move to use the forces to be to attack me and do whatever they can to take me down.   I feel I’m in the show waiting for the gong. I have a lot of short videos on youtube and my longer shows are on RizoliTV1 on youtube.

Christopher No, it would be far too depressing for TV.

No, I would not want my life (at present) depicted in a reality show. The reason? Too depressing. An amazing movie, however, could be made tracing the incredible decline, in health-wealth-and stealth, of this American; who was once quite wealthy, healthy, traveled the world, and enjoyed an ample amount of privacy and dignity.

Some actions and choices could have been better. Yet, no amount of smart moves could «plan» for the poisoning of our air, food, and water. No amount of «planning» could predict the day when I would be surrounded by «Blue Pill» takers. And no amount of «planning» could figure out what to do with the incredibly high levels of poisonous, manmade radiation being unleashed upon the Earth… No, it would be far too depressing for TV. The Sheeple prefer lighter fare. Thanks New World Order!

Andrew E – Don’t need  the ego endorphins that come from being “liked”.

No. In the same way that I don’t take photos at a museum or watch my nephew’s Christmas concert through my camera screen rather than watching live in the moment.

It is this “living in the moment” that is so undervalued today. Sharing your every thought with the world for “likes” is the great inflation of ego and the staple of generation Y. It compromises and edits the thought process during inception as every thought starts with, “what would they think of __?” “This movie’s great, I bet I can get 10 likes” “twitter would love this thought” .. And instead of sitting with our original thoughts and ideas we share them and await their reception, anticipating either silence or the ego endorphins that come from being “liked”.

Fame or even reality show celebrity is like being on social media whenever you’re in public; molding every gesture or articulation based on what the group finds pleasing. We lose the self within the crowd. Every girl who is passionate about renaissance art and every boy who is enticed by the circle of fifths in music may repress their passion for something more culturally acceptable. “How about those Grammy performances?”

Dr. JohnNope, too boring and too many mistakes. 

Now if it was a time machine and I could go back in time then that would be a different story
—-

Michael – Looking forward to growing old in as close to the most boring way possible,

I might have to watch the reality show of my life, particularly my earlier life. It was the exact opposite of the boring, steady, predictable life that I am striving towards. In fact, it contained the following elements:

*Graphic sex – my mother, for a time, did “go-go” dancing (pole dancing/stripping in the modern vernacular) to supplement the food stamps she received (single mom in the 1970’s), and then she was a prostitute-turned-madam for the mob in the 1980’s in New Jersey;

*Drugs – my father sold, then used, much cocaine and graduated to crack in the mid-80’s, smoking as much as $1,800 per day; this forced me, as a teenager, to work, sometimes multiple shifts, at the local McDonald’s in Brooklyn’s Coney Island area, just to (shortly) keep a roof over our heads;

*Homelessness – a teenaged boy should not have to sleep under the Coney Island boardwalk, or in store fronts, and have to get beat up, urinated and spit on, because his crack-addicted father burned down the apartment;

*Sexual Abuse – my father, like his father (and uncles), just couldn’t keep his hands off his daughters;

*Strange encounters – shades and shadows and other odd entities early in life, particularly in the mid-70’s, culminating in an abduction from my apartment when I was 8 years old (1978) by what is commonly referred to as the Greys;

*Military adventures – the only way out of the homeless situation, or so it seemed at the time, was to join the US Navy — it’s not just a job, it’s an adventure — where I got to live in Scotland for two years, travel throughout Europe, and get the kind of “education” some of my more well-off friends could only imagine.

Obviously, this is the Cliff’s Notes version, but now that I am 44, and recently married, both my wife and I are looking forward to growing old in as close to the most boring way possible, with the exception of occasionally going out to dance and maybe catching the occasional Hollywood action drivel. Thanks for letting me rant!

Rollin –If? My life is a reality show, and I do watch it.

If? My life is a reality show, and I do watch it. The Manduka Upanishad (as I’ve condensed it into a haiku) says:
On a bough, two birds —
One eats the sweet fruit and one
Watches and eats not.

I should add that I virtually never watch TV. This has been true my whole life. As a result, I’ve never seen even a single “reality show,” though of course I have a general idea (from the tabloids in the supermarket) of the Kardashians, Duck Dynasty, etc. But my interest in them is zero.
Because of that, at first I didn’t relate to your invitation. But then I thought: living my life knowing it is being filmed and fed to the public so I can be a celebrity is my idea of unreality, not reality, whereas my own life (modest as it is) is real; at least, it’s as real as I am willing to be. Life is real only when I am.
It’s not only real, it’s a “show,” in the sense that I not only live it, I (but not the same “I”) watch it. That’s where the Manduka Upanishad comes in. It’s a fable or parable, deliberately gnomic, written to produce an epiphany, and in condensing it, I tried to capture and preserve that quality. (The Upanishads are part of the Vedic scriptures, and are subject to different interpretations by different schools of Vedanta. I think it’s better to let it remain a parable, though I did consider giving the haiku a title taken from another Upanishad: “Thou art that.”)
As for haiku, you probably have a general idea of it. It’s like a snapshot. No explanation, no rhyme or metrical pattern, no title  It’s not only a literary form, it’s a way of perceiving and concentrating. I follow the traditional Japanese form, which I’ve defined as follows: Haiku: a poem Of three lines and seventeen Syllables. That’s it.

Illuminati Zionists & Nazis Together Again in Ukraine

604.jpg
(left. The Neo Nazi Svoboda party replaced their stylized swastika symbol
with a three finger Masonic hand sign resembling sign of Baphomet. Remarkably this
is the same sign as the “We Day” youth movement the Illuminati is selling to children in the West.
See WeDay symbol in text below.)

Illuminati Jews have no trouble collaborating with Neo Nazis
who celebrate the Jewish holocaust. Illuminati Jewish media
have no trouble suppressing the fact that that Neo Nazis
now run the Ukrainian government.

The
startling fact not revealed [in the Zionist Western media] is that Svoboda has seven members within the
government’s 21-member cabinet, so they compose one-third of the
cabinet – all in the most key and powerful positions. “


Svoboda was founded in 1991 as the Social National Party of Ukraine – its name unmistakably being an intentional reference to Adolph Hitler’s National Socialist party and it used the Nazi Wolfsangel logo which closely resembles a swastika.

In 2004, with the arrival of Oleh Tyahnybok as leader, the party changed its name to Svoboda [“Freedom”] to somewhat moderate its image while nevertheless retaining its neo-Nazi core. Also to soften its image it changed its Nazi logo to a stylized three-finger salute.

Despite all this, Oleh Tyahnybok remains totally unrepentant. In 2004, he urged Ukrainians to fight against the “Muscovite-Jewish mafia” and lauded the World War II Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists for having fought “Muscovites, Germans, Jews and other scum who wanted to take away our Ukrainian state.”

Tyahnybok’s deputy, Yuri Mikhalchishin, a Svoboda ideologist, has founded a think tank called the Joseph Goebbels Political Research Centre. He has also translated and published articles of Hitler regime “classics” and has named the Holocaust as a “bright period” in European history.

It is worthy of note that what separates Germany from the Neo Nazi Nationalists in Ukraine is that Germany has taken responsibility for the atrocities they committed.

Contrast this to Lviv, Ukraine, where surviving members of the WW2 Galician SS, willing participants in genocide, still parade on holidays, proudly displaying medals given them by the German Third Reich. In July of 2013 the Svoboda party organized a rally to mark the 70th anniversary of the founding of the 14thWaffen SS Division. And on January 1, 2014, to commemorate their founder’s 105th birthday, about 15,000 Svoboda supporters marched through Kyiv, some wearing Nazi SS Waffen army uniforms.

Although many in the media dismiss the Right Sector as insignificant, this body was formed in 2013 as an umbrella organization that included several paramilitary groups, including the Ukrainian National Assembly-Ukrainian National Self Defense (UNA-UNSO) whose members dress in uniforms modelled on Hitler’s Waffen SS and have been fighting Russia for years, including in Chechnya.

As of March 22, 2014, all these individual groups have coalesced into the Right Sector and have declared themselves to be an official political party, with Dmytro Yarosh as their presidential candidate in the coming election.

In trying to downplay the significance and role of Svoboda and the Right Sector, the media usually point out that Svoboda has only 8 percent of the seats in the Rada and that the Right Sector doesn’t have any elected members, thus making it appear that these parties are of little consequence.

The startling fact not revealed is that Svoboda has seven members within the government’s 21-member cabinet, so they compose one-third of the cabinet – all in the most key and powerful positions. Moreover, the Right Sector has a role in government as well; its leader Dmytro Yarosh is in charge of the police as the Deputy Secretary to the Minister of National Security.


weday.jpg
(Ukrainian Nazis and We Day youth movement have same symbol. Coincidence?)

As such, these two neo-Nazi parties have been entrusted with key positions which grant them de facto control over the Armed Forces, Police and National Security. Certainly this information is of the utmost importance – but it is practically never mentioned in the media. Why is this? Essentially, reporting of this type puts forth a very favourable propaganda image of the provisional government. In reality, in putting forth propaganda, what is not said is often every bit as important as what is said. At the very least this is damaging misinformation.

Because the issue of the role of Svoboda in Ukraine’s government is so fundamentally important, let’s take a look at the cabinet membership.

Oleksandr Sych– Deputy Prime Minister, a Svoboda parliamentarian, the party’s chief ideologist, and a virulent anti-abortion activist

Ihor Tenyukh
– Minister of Defence, member of Svoboda’s political council, and formerly commander of Ukraine’s  navy but was dismissed from his post when he tried to help Georgia following its military attack on South Ossetia which Russia quickly rebuffed.

Andriy Parubiy– Secretary of the National Security and National Defense Committee (RNBOU), co-founder of the Social-National Party of Ukraine (Svoboda). This is a key position which oversees the Ministry of Defense, the Armed Forces, Law Enforcement, National Security and Intelligence. The RNBOU is central decision-making body. While it is formally headed by the president, it is run by the Secretariat with a staff of 180 people including defense, intelligence and national security experts. Parubiy was the head “kommandant” of the MaidanRight Sector forces and directed the masked armed men who battled the police.

Oleh Makhnitsky – Prosecutor-general, Svoboda member of parliament. With this appointment Svoboda will control the judicial process.

Ihor Shvaika – Minister of Agriculture, an agro-oligarch and a member of Svoboda. As one of the richest men in the country, his massive investments in agriculture would seem to indicate a slight conflict of interest.

Andriy Moknyk – Minister of Ecology, Deputy Chairman of the Svoboda party and a member of their Political Council, and has been Svoboda’s envoy to other European fascist parties.

Serhiy Kvit -Minister of Education, a leading member of Svoboda, noted for his efforts to glorify those who inspiredthe Bandera fascists in World War II.

Dmytro Yarosh – Deputy head of the National Security Council, to be in charge of the police. Yarosh is the founder-leader of the paramilitary “Right Sector,” and together with Parubiy they directed the demonstrations at Maiden.Years back, Yorash fought alongside Chechen Islamists, and proudly claims that he personally killed a large number of Russian soldiers.

So although Svoboda has only eight percent of the members in the Ukrainian parliament, they, along with the Right Sector, compose more than a third of the government’s cabinet, including some of the key positions. Hence they have a totally disproportionate share of power, and to compound the problem, Svoboda have no elected members from the entire southeastern part of Ukraine, which has more than half of Ukraine’s population…

It is important to note that some of the interim government’s top ministers were also ministers in previous governments and were participants in policies that created the country’s current economic basket case. During all these years they had failed to curb rampant corruption or tackle economic inefficiency.

The EU has provided Ukraine with $19.1 billion in grants and loans since 1991, and together with IMF and other aid it pushes the total well over $30 billion.

And despite Ukraine’s current antagonistic rhetoric, the country has received massive aid from Russia in the form of discounted natural gas–a subsidy totaling $200 billion to $300 billion since 1991. So where has all this money gone?

“Into the pockets of an incredibly corrupt political elite and oligarchs,” says Emily Holland, a specialist on energy policy at the European Council on Foreign Relations in Berlin.

And with all the brouhaha about corruption by the protest movement, the new fascist-tainted regime has appointed some of the worst oligarchs to key regional government posts in eastern Ukraine. So what are the realistic prospects for this essentially failed state?

Does Talmud Teach Bestiality, Pedophilia, Incest?

talmud7.jpg

Pedophilia and Bestiality are seeping into popular culture.
Could the Talmud be the source?

St. Paul, who had been a Pharisee, often bores
Christians who do not know what he was arguing about, in his
discourses haranguing Pharisees. But one familiar with the Talmud can
appreciate his diatribe against the “uncleanness” of those,
“Who changed the truth of God into a lie” and: “Professing
themselves to be wise, they became fools,” until “God gave
them over to a reprobate mind … . Being filled with all
unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness … .” (Romans 1:22,
25, 28).

Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the
“Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely
today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps
nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate
minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of
Yebamoth.

Although
Moses commanded that if a woman have intercourse with a beast, both
should be killed (Leviticus 20:16), and that a priest must not marry
a harlot or woman who is profane (Lev. 21:7), the Talmud teaches that
“unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to
marry a High Priest,” since then “you will find no woman
eligible … .” (Folios 59a-59b)

Rulings of the “sages”
follow: “A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to
marry a priest — even a High Priest.” … If she had
intercourse with a dog while sweeping the floor, she is likewise
reckoned to be pure, and suitable. For, “The result of such
intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does
not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does
not regard such as intercourse either.”

This alone gives
a fair idea of the systematic deformation of Scripture by the
Pharisees and the truthfulness of Christ’s denunciations about their
making God’s commandments of none effect by their Tradition. (Matthew
15:6)

BABIES

Baby
boys may always be used as subjects for sodomy by grown men,
according to the Talmud. (The Pharisaic subterfuge here is that until
a child reaches sexual maturity, capable of sexual intercourse, he or
she does not rank as a person, hence Biblical laws against sodomy
(pederasty) do not apply. Throughout the Talmud “nine years and
one day” is the fictitious age of male maturity.

Likewise,
under “nine years and one day,” the “first stage of
intercourse” of a boy with the mother, or any grown woman, is
harmless, Talmudically. Shammai,
to seem more “strict,” lowers the age to eight years in
some cases. (See Exhibit 82 from Sanhedrin 69b of the Talmud)

A
long harangue about the amount of the Kethubah (payment if divorced)
a woman gets if her virginity was removed by a young boy, fills
Kethuboth I lb of the Talmud. And here, the foul mother may be
reckoned “pure,” depending on the age of the child. Such
degrading use of children was typical of paganism throughout the
ancient world.

“When a grown up man has intercourse with
a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this —
that is, less than three years old — it is as if one puts the finger
into the eye — tears come to the eye again and again, so does
virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (See
Exhibit 136, Kethuboth 11b of the Talmud)

This is the standard
doctrine of the whole Talmud on baby girls. Sodomy and intercourse
with babies is the prerogative of the adult Talmudic man, in contrast
to Christ’s beautiful teachings concerning little children.

The
following is also typical concerning the fictitious age of sexual
maturity of baby girls set by the Pharisee “sages:” “A
maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by
coition …” See Exhibit 55 (Sanhedrin 55b), Exhibit 81
(Sanhedrin 69a-69b), Exhibit 156 (Yebamoth 57b), and Exhibit 159
(Yebamoth 60b); also Niddah 44b…

Adultery is permitted
with the wife of a minor, and wife of a non-Jew. (See Exhibit 53) The
pretense is that a minor not being a “man” yet, and the
non-Jew having non-human status, Talmudically, the Biblical law does
not apply.

Thus, once again do the Pharisees make the
commandments of God of “none effect” as Christ said.
(Matthew 15:6, Mark 7:13)

INCEST

Moses
ordered the priests that: “They shall not take a wife that is a
whore, or profane … for he is holy unto his God.” (Leviticus
21:7) The laws against incest are most vehement: “The nakedness
of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother …
(Leviticus 18:7) And in the Talmud the Pharisee “sages”
reverse these Biblical injunctions:

“If a woman sported
lewdly with her young son, a minor and he committed the first stage
of cohabitation with her — Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her
unfit to the Priesthood.” Here a footnote explains that she
could not marry a priest, if this made her profane and the above
Leviticus 21:7 is cited precisely. (See Exhibit 82)

We then
learn that the dispute concerns only the age of the son, not the
lewdness of the foul mother: “All agree that the connection of a
boy aged nine years and one day is a real connection whilst that of
one less than eight years is not [Footnote: “So that if he was
nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is
invalidated from the priesthood, whilst if he was less than eight,
Beth Shamnmai agree that she is not.”] …

PERMISSIBLE
ADULTERY AND INTERCOURSE WITH THE DEAD

“None
of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover
their nakedness: I am the Lord,” says the Book (Lev. 18:6).
Scripture references are also cited which denounce a married woman
who lies “carnally” with a man not her husband. But say the
sages: “That in connection with a married woman excludes
intercourse with a relaxed membrum since no fertilization can
possibly result. This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance
with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with
forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated.”

And other Talmud sources are cited. “The exclusion is
rather that of intercourse with a dead woman [Footnote 15] even
though she died as a married woman.” Thus one is “exonerated”
for, or permitted, intercourse with dead relatives or with relatives,
married or single, “with a relaxed membrum,” because “no
fertilization can possibly result.” (Talmud, Yebamoth 55b, See
Exhibit 163)

Intercourse with dead bodies was an old pagan
practice. The above is echoed with some variation in “the chief
repository of the criminal law of the Talmud,” the book of
Sanhedrin. (See Exhibit 89)

There the act of sodomy with one
suffering with an incurable disease, hence regarded as already dead,
or a “terefah,” is held to be merely “as one who
abuses a dead person, and hence exempt.” The explanation, which
continues on the next page (not reproduced) is: “Punishment is
generally imposed because of the forbidden pleasure derived —
[footnote] Whereas there is no sexual gratification in abusing the
dead.”

How apt it was when Christ called the Talmudic
Pharisees “whited sepulchers … full of all uncleanness.”
(Matt. 23) Yet some of His followers call these abominators of every
decency “God’s Chosen People” and “People of the
Book”!

How Could Somebody So Smart be So Stupid?

Now, for something completely different, let’s rack our brains
for examples of really smart people who did really stupid things
and speculate why.

I’ll suggest the obvious ones – please suggest others!

There seems to be a disconnect between intellectual intelligence and emotional maturity.

1. Bill Clinton: “I did not have sex with that woman!”  This man was US President. Did he take his responsibilities so lightly that he subjected himself to blackmail? I mean give his enemies yet another way to blackmail him?

spitzer99.jpg2.  Eliot Spitzer, left.  This man was Governor of New York. And he uses a regular upscale prostitution service. You cannot take a political stand without making enemies. Didn’t he realize this would get out? Didn’t he believe in his cause? How could he shame his wife and family?

3. Anthony Weiner. Again, was he incapable of assessing the consequences of sending selfies of his wiener to near strangers?

4. Woody Allen – Apart from the selfishness and harm done to an innocent human being, didn’t he realize that Dylan Farrow would talk?

5. JFK Jr. doesn’t belong in this company. But if I were planning a career in politics, and my father and uncle were assassinated, I would not  by flying a Cessna.

edwards-love-child-photo.jpg6.  John Edwards letting his videographer Rielle Hunter seduce him, and bear his love child, while is wife has cancer. This man was John Kerry’s running mate in 2004 and ran for president in 2008. Goodbye political career. Smart but stupid.

7. Tiger Woods. “Don’t be controlled by your d**k. It will ruin your life.” Tiger Woods-A Lesson for All Men.

8.  Dominique Strauss Kahn, Secretary General of the IMF, in line to become President of France, threw it all up to assault a hotel maid? (IMF Chief’s Sex Behavior Typical of Illuminati)

9. CIA Director David “Betrayus” – admitted he “screwed up royally” boinking his biographer.

10. Jim writes: “Jimmy Swaggart – A televangelist who exposed a fellow minister’s sexual misdeeds but was himself later exposed by that same minister for having sex with a prostitute.

11. Jim Bakker – A televangelist who defrauded millions of dollars from his viewer, paid off his secretary for her silence, and was later accused of raping her. He was sentenced to 45 years in prison and a $500,000 fine but was released after doing only 5 years and no fine.
12. Ted Haggard – A minister of a mega-church in Colorado who paid a male masseur for sex and drugs. Was also accused of masturbating in front of another man in a hotel room. Why do people risk everything to do such things? I believe that it basically boils down to one thing; the thrill. The desire for the elicit outweighs the consequences of being caught.