The anti-Christ is among us. Our survival depends on learning to recognize him.

Melinda Pillsbury-Foster 

Date: 04-03-2012
Subject:
Day of Reckoning

The
anti-Christ is among us. Our survival depends on learning to
recognize him.
Psychopaths, they do evil for evil’s
sake.
 
 
Today we are witnessing the complete
breakdown of our institutions. This is true in finance, banking, and
government. The bald fact confronts us at the gas pump and in the
supermarket. It is true in education, where we pay heavily to ensure
our children learn only to find, instead, they are being
propagandized and their presence in schools used to assert control
over how they are raised.
 
War has become our continual condition.
Young people are enticed and coerced into the military through
promises, which will not be kept, and economic conditions which leave
them no choices. They come home inflicted with PTSD,TBI, struggling
to function. Many die of suicide, or on the streets, homeless.
 
Our courts have long since ceased being
the dispassionate tribunal where the condition and wealth of those
standing before it does not matter. Corruption, purchased verdicts,
and greed, drive those who were entrusted with ensuring equal access
to justice for all Americans.
 
Law enforcement, police, prisons, and
its management and infrastructure, moved into fast forward over a
decade ago. The police know nothing about the Constitution or our
rights. Their training is militarized. Prisons have become
corporate profit centers, expanding due to the proliferation of laws
which bolster their bottom line, sucking money out of the pockets of
Americans.
 
We have been told it is right and
proper to bail out irresponsible and predatory corporations – but
individuals who paid into Social Security must pull in their belts
and live on less on less – even as the cost of food continues to
climb monthly, edging them toward starvation.
 
Organic dairies and gardening are under
attack, while GMO is fast tracked.
 
The middle class has all but
disappeared, leaving only the wealthy – and the rest of us.
 
In every part we confront the growth of
restrictions and controls, limitations of our right to choose for
ourselves.
 
We look into each others eyes and ask,
“What happened?”
 
You’ve heard many theories and watched
as attempts to correct the corruption failed. Checks and balances
have also been hijacked. These are all failing because the
foundational problem was not recognized.
 
The electoral process has been
hijacked. From the presentation of candidates, until the votes are
counted, the whole is managed through a process which includes media
owned by what I call Greedville, in the case of media seven large,
global corporations which are all controlled by psychopaths.
Information, now divorced from facts, is filtered through systems for
nomination and voting managed outside of the public view.
 
The presence of psychopaths among us is
the problem.
 
Normal people could never pull this
off. Normal people have consciences. Our unseen problem has been
those without conscience, the psychopathic, who concentrate where
they have access to power, changing institutional practices and
culture, looting the system.
 
Humanity needs to understand and take
action. In this series we will lay out causes and what can be done
to take back our world.
 
Understand psychopathy through the
case of Alexander, 13th Duke of Manchester, psychopath.
The strategies used by psychopaths
How our institutions fail to
account for psychopathic behavior.
How psychopaths manipulate the
emotionally normal to work for them.
Understand the impact of their
presence among us.
 
 
Alexander, 13th Duke of
Manchester
The Early Life
of a Psychopath
 
Allow me to introduce you to the poster
boy for Psychopathy, His Grace, Alexander, the 13th Duke
of Manchester, or Alexander Montagu, though during his criminal
career he has used other names in plenty. He is not a smart
psychopath, but his life illustrates many truths about the condition.
 
Alexander
Montagu is one of the hundreds of thousands of those without
conscience walking among us. This assertion is supported by a wealth
of evidence from multiple sources over a period spanning decades.
 His
condition was first identified by a psychiatrist named Dr. Barry
Williamson, who attended him in 1984 when he was institutionalized
for assault with a spear gun and attempted suicide.  At the time
he was on welfare, received because he was deemed ‘disabled.’
Montagu
was treated at Pine
Lodge Clinic,
according to the transcript.   
Dr.
Williamson’s  comment, made to Montagu’s solicitor Mr. Zoltan
Varszeghy, who has now returned to Hungary, is included. The comment
entered into the court record was, “Dr.
Williamson attended him there. Dr. Williamson has in fact told me he
has psychopathic tendencies.”

The full transcript can be viewed. Bottom
of page 9
.
Montagu was then
facing charges of assault against his wife and at least one police
officer with a spear gun.
 His behavior as
a child was disruptive, both according to his mother, this supplied
in emails, and according to his brother Kimble, information provided
in a declaration
given in 2011.
Alexander was
expelled twenty times from the school he attended in Beverly Hills
and from every other school where he was placed, according  to
his mother, Lady Mary Montagu. He failed to develop relationships
with either of his siblings, both of whom grew up to live normal,
stable, lives.
This is an
identifying characteristic of a psychopath.
 His
relationship with his mother is one of demanding his needs be
serviced while he provides nothing in return. 
Another
psychopathic characteristic; he is entitled.
He has borrowed money
from his sister, Emma, and never repaid the funds and his brother,
Kimble was also called upon for assistance, despite the fact Kimble
is not close to him and so testified in his declaration
given under penalty of perjury for the High Court of Justice,
Chancery Division, in July of 2011.
 Borrowing money
from others, or receiving services, activates a strategy which his
former wife,Wendy Buford, reported seeing played out many times.  
After receiving funds
or services Montagu  distances himself from the individual, who
he vilifies.  He then picks a fight, and refuses to carry
through with his promise for payment or repayment.  It is always
their fault, never his. 
This is the concept
of ‘splitting,’ used by the disordered. The targeted victim is
either all good, when they are being used; or all bad, when he is
finished with them. 
This is a standard
strategy common to psychopaths.
The vilification
strategy also includes assault by slander, a massive campaign to
destroy the reputation of the individual who is no longer useful to
him. Relatives, journalists, business partners, former wives, and
friends have all experienced this parting gift from Montagu.
When discovered in a
crime Montagu blames others. During Montagu’s recent arraignment for
passing a bad check in Las Vegas he, or his wife, variously claimed
it was a case of mistaken identity, use of the wrong checkbook, or a
plot carried out to embarrass him.  
This frequently
works for him 
because he is titled, and because, as a psychopath, he shows no sense
of guilt or shame.  He lies smoothly and constantly, remaking
reality as he believes it will work to persuade his victim to perform
as he wants. 
Having thoroughly
victimized his target Montagu positions himself as the victim. 
This is a strategy known as, the ‘Turn Around.’
This also is
characteristic of psychopaths.
All successful con
men are psychopaths.  Police in Australia identified Alexander
Montagu as a “highly
successful con-man,’
by
the time he was 29 years of age, this remark memorialized in an
article written about him in the Australian
Post
in May
of 1991.  This classification of psychopath is not necessarily
violent, but is, nonetheless, psychopathic.  Murderers such as
Paul
Bernardo, Clifford Olson, John Wayne Gacy may be serial killers,
smiling as they murder, but most psychopaths, such as Montagu, are
subclinical, meaning they avoid punishment because their crimes are
financial or less egregious forms of abuse than murder – but still
costly and damaging to their victims.
This
term, used by Robert Hare,
the recognized world expert on psychopathy, includes individuals
who, who, like Montagu are dangerous and unpredictable.
A
difference in the brain
 The source of
psychopathy is in the brain itself.   A  study
carried out at the University of Wisconsin-Madison by researchers
found a variance while studying images of prisoners’ brains. 
These revealed that psychopaths have reduced connections between the
ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), the part of the brain
responsible for sentiments such as empathy and guilt, and the
amygdala,  reconciling fear and anxiety
Because psychopaths
do not feel emotions,fear or empathy, they do not experience love or
guilt.  Normal humans reference emotional states and their
actions and choices are dictated and limited by their feelings.
These characteristics are shared by all normal humans and human
institutions are designed, taking into account concern for others and
a working conscience.
A normal individual
cannot lie without experiencing anxiety. This is the basis of the Lie
Detector.  A psychopath feels no anxiety when he is lying, for
him lying is normal behavior.  This helps to explain how our
institutions have been converted by the psychopathic for their own
profit. As normal humans we sense when someone is anxious, this can
lead us to believe they are lying – and to the assumption those
without anxiety are telling the truth.
 Psychopaths who
are subclinical, formulate their strategies for getting what they
want from experimenting with what works to accomplish their goals.
Over the last centuries, and especially during the 20th
Century, psychopaths have intentionally, and actively, worked to
convert our institutions to a centralized model which allowed them to
have control.
How this took place
is the subject of a later article.
An examination of the
Federal Reserve System, the Federal government, finance, our
infrastructure for regulation, among others, shows how these can, in
effect, become operational tools for the highly psychopathic, who are
concentrated in these specific areas.
Estimates of the
percentage of the psychopathic in finance is believed to be far
larger than the general population. Theories of the impact of
psychopaths on corporate culture have been, according to Robert Hare,
PhD., and growing number of experts and observers, highly
significant.
In a paper appearing
in the Journal of Business Ethics, 2011, “The
Corporate Psychopaths Theory for Global Financial Crisis,”
written
by Clive R. Boddy and copyrighted by Springer, cites the need for
further study of the impact of psychopaths in the corporate
environment, pointing out the ‘strengths’ of psychopaths, charisma,
self-confidence, and presentation, allow them to claim credit for
successes for which they are not responsible. Since they lack
conscience this is most likely to happen. Psychopaths are not
troubled when they walk away with huge remuneration, leaving the
company to falter and die. In recent days, we have often watches
this take place.
The theory is
receiving serious consideration in business and studies are
continuing.
Psychopaths operating
on the level of banking, finance, and other institutions function on
a higher level level than Montagu. They are more intelligent and are
more able to emulate emotions. They are smoother and far more
difficult to identify.
Montagu is an example
of a lower level psychopath, he routinely threatens violence and has
been violent, witness his several convictions for assault in
Australia.  He, however, learned to modify the amount of
violence to ensure he would not again face incarceration.
All psychopaths tend
to find successful strategies and repeat them. Psychopaths,
regardless of intelligence, are limited in innovation. But they are
skilled in manipulation and control. They have a radar sense of
knowing what the normal person expects and use this to gain trust and
access to whatever they are trying obtain from the victim. They
wolves in sheep’s clothing, waiting for the moment to strike.
Manipulation and
control are standard tools for psychopaths.
Montagu’s subsequent
acts illustrate the desire for immediate gratification, ability to
ignore potential hazards, and ability to rewrite reality to fit into
the lies he was telling to engage possible victims.
This is typical of
the psychopath, category –
Egocentric
and Grandiose
In 1988 Montagu had
openly solicited marriage by purchase for the title of Duchess. In
another article, titled, “My
Barmy Marriage.”
written
the same year in The People, Marion Stoner reacts, offering
her story, having read Montagu was attempting to profit by marriage.
She
had been unable to find him to serve papers, she reported in the
article. She goes on to outline what transpired to a small degree.
Her Application
for Separation  
,
given under penalty of perjury, is more forthcoming and reads like a
horror story. Other documents, found here,
support her statements.
1991
found Montagu arrested for entering Canada. The title of the
article, Diana’s
Cousin Selling Title
appeared on September 21, 1991  in the
Sun Journal.
The reason for his arrest appears at the end, “He
was arrested for allegedly entering Canada illegally from Hong Kong
on June 17th.
Immigration officials say he failed to disclose 29 criminal
convictions for fraud and assault in Australia.”
Montagu
knew he was not divorced from his first wife, Marion Stoner, who he
had assaulted and lethally threatened with a spear gun, after less
than three months of marriage. The spear missed Marion’s friend’s
head, also present, by half an inch.
Today
Montagu asserts, against all existing proof, several conflicting
stories. He tells people Marion Stoner never existed. He tells
people the wedding was a gag. He tells people his mother flubbed the
annulment, and he tells people his mother had a long term plot to get
the title of Duke for his younger brother. The story used depends on
what he thinks will work.
Proof
means nothing to a psychopath. Reality is what they say it is. This
can sometimes work against them in several ways.
Viscount
Mandeville solves the problem of being deported and homeless.
And, as a testament
to how easily the psychopath, even a less intelligent psychopath, can
manipulate normal people, let us consider how Montagu managed to
stay in a relationship with Wendy Buford Montagu for 15 years, years
fraught with trauma for her.
Montagu originally
married Wendy because he was running out of money and was in danger
of being deported. Married to an American woman with a job evidently
became his goal. Wendy reported Alexander was supposedly living with
his business partner but had his own car. She later learned he was
borrowing the car owned by his business partner’s girl friend,
claiming to own it.
The
entire relationship can truthfully be characterized as one outrage
after another.
Montagu
married Buford in 1993, just before the birth of their son,
Alexander, Jr., his first act was to demand she visit the immigration
office to prove they were legally married (a lie) so he could evade
deportation, which he said was about to take place due to the threats
of his business partner. Within weeks of their first date he had
insinuated himself into her apartment and was using her car as his
own. His business partner’s girl friend had reclaimed her automobile.
Over
the next 15 years the couple was evicted 11 times, each time because
Alexander spent the money for rent or the mortgage elsewhere. Wendy
was never permitted to know anything about their finances. Asking if
the rent was paid was pointless. Alexander would always lie.
When evicted for
non-payment of rent or mortgage, he focused anger on the landlord,
routinely destroying the property. This has included pouring cement
down the toilets. according to his present wife Laura.  With
Montagu the barrage of such behavior was constant and consistent,
according to his wife of 15 years, Wendy Buford Montagu.  
 Since
Montagu never had a job it was his wife’s income from her job which
was garnisheed.  Today, Wendy is still paying off these debts.
Although
his mother, Lady Mary, carried the paperwork for the Stoner divorce
in 1996, asking Alexander only to sign and return papers.
After
the divorce Lady Mary ordered him to remarry Wendy, who had no idea
he had been married to Marion Stoner at the time of their wedding.
Alexander never mentioned the matter. He had lied on their marriage
license, checking, ‘never married,’ instead of ‘married but
annulled,’ which had been an option. He had not mentioned an
annulment, but one of his alternative reality stories would be
blaming his mother for not finishing an annulment which there is no
record had ever been filed.
Yet
if Alexander had not, himself, informed the Trustees, the matter
would have died there. Alexander, whose life, like all psychopaths,
is filled with chaos, decided to divorce Wendy after he succeeded to
the title of Duke in 2002, while waiting for the sale of the
Manchester Jewels to provide him with funds.
Wendy
could not help but notice he started going to the tanning salon, had
his teeth redone, and spending other money on himself from a
household budget which was slim at best. Overweight, he also had a
colon reduction so he could slim down. Naturally, he lied to Wendy,
telling her the surgery was covered by insurance and was for his
back. This deception worked for him until she came to pick him up at
the hospital and asked the nurse how the back surgery had gone.
Their
divorce from a non-existent marriage was orchestrated by Montagu
with the intention of gaining custody of the children so Wendy would
be required to pay him both alimony and child support.
Filing
a false report of violence, he received a temporary order excluding
her from the family home. Wendy, realizing what was happening,
cooperated completely with the court and went through an intense,
expensive, and humiliating process which proved she did not take
drugs, was not an alcoholic, and was not violent. Wendy was awarded
physical custody of both children, who were turned over to her
without any of their possessions and dressed in only their pajamas.
Alexander
made none of the court ordered payments for tests he had demanded,
though the court had insisted he do so. Montagu had stolen all of
Wendy’s property, evidently selling her family heirlooms and jewelry.
Wendy has received none of her possessions. All Montagu offered to
give her were some old clothes.
Making
Wendy disappear must finally have occurred to him as a solution to
his problem. Fortunately for her, the individual Montagu asked to
carry out the act, who was not psychopathic, called her and warned
her what had been offered him. Her call to local detectives made this
course too risky for Montagu to pursue. 
Montagu
had
attempted to hide his assets and bank accounts. These had been
discovered through subpoena, including one account holding nearly
one millions dollars. He was confronted with the records on the
stand and still tried to lie his way out, claiming it could not be
his account.
Montagu left the
area, never paying the court ordered support for his children or
alimony. The court proved entirely unable to cope with someone for
whom deceit was natural and who never paid his bills.
Normal people follow
the rules. Psychopaths ignore them.
Charges of Bigamy
are proved.
Two years after their
divorce was over, 2009, evidently hoping the monies paid to the
children would be directed to him by the Trust if his children were
known to be illegitimate, he so informed the Trustees.
The Trustees were
forced to stop the payments to the children, made on their behalf as
beneficiaries, which had made up for the support not received by
their father. After short consideration the Trustees filed a law
suit, intended to clarify and affirm their wish to continue payments,
not allowed under existing law.
The law suit was
filed in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division and heard on
July 19th
2011. The Trustees could restart payments to the straitened family.
In the immediate aftermath a spate of articles hit papers across the
world, naming Montagu as a bigamist, which examination of the
existing documents and testimony had proven him to be.
Proof means nothing
to a psychopath. Realizing the public relations disaster he had
wrought, Montagu began to whine, asking for someone to prove someone
else was responsible.
With the negative
weight of the world opinion directed at him, not a shred of shame or
contrition surfaced. Consideration for what his children had
suffered, what he had done to his former wife, were ignored. The
fact he was also proven to have committed massive fraud against his
former wife, he also ignored, focusing only on himself.
His only interaction
with his children is limited to calling them up to slander their
mother and make demands. This reached a high, or low point, when he
called his 12 year old daughter, Ashley, to describe pictures he had
taken of her mother, clearly asleep in her bed unclothed. He told
his daughter he had arranged to sell these to a porn site online.
The taped message exists and will soon be back up online.
Whatever happens is
always blamed on someone else. Bringing it full circle, this was true
of his childhood and, as you read articles
written about him over his life time, you see this has been 
consistent.  He shows no sense of shame, no empathy, no
compassion.  
Judge
Margaret McMurdo
, before whom Montagu appeared in Australia for
stealing and selling rental cars in 1991, advised him to continue his
psychiatric care,  “You need it,” she commented.  
It has been noted by others in the legal profession he lives in a
fantasy world and does not relate to reality.  The court was
unable to cope with Montagu, releasing him to prey again, even though
by 1991 there was a solid record of his crimes.
The Direction
Forward – A Solution
During the 80’s and
90’s psychiatry believed psychopaths could be ‘cured.’  This
hopeful assessment has now been largely abandoned, due to the
insights gained through the work of Robert Hare, Ph.D., who has
demonstrated the fact psychopaths receiving counseling benefit, but
only by becoming more effective psychopaths. 
It is time we focused
on the source of the problem and, in cooperation with reform
movements, began taking psychopaths into account.
Studying the history
of Alexander, Duke of Manchester, provides evidentiary proof of the
inability of courts on three continents to cope with the extreme
likelihood he would, upon release, again look for unwitting victims.
The number of Montagu’s victims doubtless number in the hundreds. As
tragic as this is, it cannot be compared to the disastrous outcome
from psychopaths who infest our institutions, converting for their
own profit. Millions of Americans are, today, their victims. This is
only the tip of the iceberg.
We must stop the
psychopathic from participation, where a conscience and empathy are
essential. Those areas are government, corporations with government
contracts, our courts, our schools, and all entities funded by or in
contractual relationships with government.
The Hare test for
psychopathy, given by a qualified and trained professional is very
reliable, remarkably so, when used by non-law enforcement. Hare
expressed reservations at having it used more widely and, there are
indications this might prove to be the case, according to an
article, Can
A Test Really Tell Who’s A Psychopath?

by Alix
Spiegel
appearing on NPR. But the problem arises from tests
given by individuals, who though trained, are being paid by parties
with a vested interest in a specific outcome. If tests are given
blind, with no information provided to the person administering the
test, this would not be an issue.
Hare himself has
suggested it be used for those in government, corporations, courts,
including attorneys, and in law enforcement. This would be given
upon application for employment or, now to continue employment.
We don’t need
legislation to enact this measure. Before voting for candidates, we
demand they be tested,in effect, certified non-psychopathic, a kind
of Honesty Bond. Some corporations will willingly test their
officers and upper level employees. We buy from them, boycotting all
others.
Ordinary corruption,
we can handle.
A Note:
One week from today
is Easter, the yearly celebration of the resurrection of Christ, a
man who exemplifies Love. Eerily, the psychopathic exemplify the
anti-Christ. Devoid of conscience and compassion, psychopaths share
the characteristics of the devil, doing evil for evil’s sake. As I
considered this I felt a chill run across my back.
Many have wondered
when the Anti-Christ, long predicted, would be known. Many
individuals and institutions have been suggested in this role. The
threat represented by the anti-Christ seemed to come from all around
us but be no place specific.
A threat spread among
us would have that effect. Not knowing, we could not see, looking
into faced that seem all too human.
Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply